Comparison of Proprioception for HTO (High Tibial Osteotomy) and UKA (Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty)
NCT ID: NCT05993637
Last Updated: 2023-08-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-31
2024-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the management of degenerative medial gonarthrosis; symptomatic relief and provide orthopaedic surgeons with the aim to slow down the progression of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) unikompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used. In recent years, HTO and UKA have been preferred more frequently among these surgical methods due to a number of advantages they provide for patients.
As a result of the orthopedic surgeries performed, interventions are made on bone and joint structures and problems may occur in the proprioceptive inputs provided by the body. In UKA, a new joint structure is created by changing the bone structure and removing the tibial plateau, while in HTO, the existing bone structure is preserved and a positional change is created. Thus, while it is expected that the proprioceptive response to be different between the two surgeries, no studies have been found in the literature on this issue. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries applied to individuals diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis on the proprioception of patients and to examine the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries on patients diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis.
H0: There is no difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis is considered.
H1: There is a difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis are considered.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy.
NCT04467970
Unicondylar- or Total Knee Replacement? Patient Satisfaction, Function and Muscle Mass
NCT02563756
Ankle Pain and Orientation After High Tibial Osteotomy as a Treatment of Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05183750
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Medial Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
NCT04036266
A Multi-Center Bidirectional Cohort Study on Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT06990594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Tibial Osteotomy
patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent HTO surgery
Examination of propriception
application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist
Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty
patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent UKA surgery
Examination of propriception
application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Examination of propriception
application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Performing unilateral UKA or HTO surgery
* Moderate medial knee arthrosis on pre-op X-ray
* Presence of mild varus deformity in the pre-op period
* Should be BMI\<30
Exclusion Criteria
* Having undergone revision surgery
* The presence of any other orthopedic problems/problems and surgery
* Concomitant of a common rheumatological disease
* Presence of neurological problems/problems
* Having visual and auditory problems at a level that prevents communication
50 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aysenur Erekdag
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ipek Yeldan Karagoz, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009 Dec;16(6):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 22.
Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018 Nov;31(10):992-998. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Cao Z, Mai X, Wang J, Feng E, Huang Y. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
He M, Zhong X, Li Z, Shen K, Zeng W. Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 14;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01601-z.
Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 28;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9.
Ghai S, Driller M, Ghai I. Effects of joint stabilizers on proprioception and stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 May;25:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
F-473945936
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.