Comparison of Proprioception for HTO (High Tibial Osteotomy) and UKA (Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty)

NCT ID: NCT05993637

Last Updated: 2023-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-31

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Osteoarthritis of the knee (KOA), a common degenerative joint disease, affects a significant part of the world's population. Although it can hold all the compartments in the knee joint, isolated medial compartment involvement has been reported in about 85% of individuals diagnosed with KOA.

In the management of degenerative medial gonarthrosis; symptomatic relief and provide orthopaedic surgeons with the aim to slow down the progression of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) unikompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used. In recent years, HTO and UKA have been preferred more frequently among these surgical methods due to a number of advantages they provide for patients.

As a result of the orthopedic surgeries performed, interventions are made on bone and joint structures and problems may occur in the proprioceptive inputs provided by the body. In UKA, a new joint structure is created by changing the bone structure and removing the tibial plateau, while in HTO, the existing bone structure is preserved and a positional change is created. Thus, while it is expected that the proprioceptive response to be different between the two surgeries, no studies have been found in the literature on this issue. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to compare the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries applied to individuals diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis on the proprioception of patients and to examine the effects of HTO and UKA surgeries on patients diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis.

H0: There is no difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis is considered.

H1: There is a difference between the surgical methods applied when the proprioception of patients with HTO and UKA surgeries planned for individuals with medial gonarthrosis are considered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Volunteer participants who have been diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and have varus deformity and have undergone surgery will be included. The surgical groups will be divided into two categories: HTO and UKA. Evaluations of the participants in terms of proprioception will be made. A voluntary consent form will be obtained from the participants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Tibial Osteotomy

patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent HTO surgery

Examination of propriception

Intervention Type OTHER

application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist

Unicompartmantal Knee Arthroplasty

patients who were diagnosed with medial gonarthrosis and underwent UKA surgery

Examination of propriception

Intervention Type OTHER

application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Examination of propriception

application of the tests used in proprioception assessment to patients by a physiotherapist

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing surgery at the age of 50-65
* Performing unilateral UKA or HTO surgery
* Moderate medial knee arthrosis on pre-op X-ray
* Presence of mild varus deformity in the pre-op period
* Should be BMI\<30

Exclusion Criteria

* Regular exercise at least 3 days a week, 150 minutes, moderate intensity
* Having undergone revision surgery
* The presence of any other orthopedic problems/problems and surgery
* Concomitant of a common rheumatological disease
* Presence of neurological problems/problems
* Having visual and auditory problems at a level that prevents communication
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aysenur Erekdag

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ipek Yeldan Karagoz, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aysenur Erekdag, BsC

Role: CONTACT

+905548959013

Omer Naci Ergin, Asst. Prof.

Role: CONTACT

+905325051388

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M, Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee. 2009 Dec;16(6):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 May 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19464898 (View on PubMed)

Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Past, Current Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018 Nov;31(10):992-998. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1625961. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29514367 (View on PubMed)

Cao Z, Mai X, Wang J, Feng E, Huang Y. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Dec 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29203354 (View on PubMed)

He M, Zhong X, Li Z, Shen K, Zeng W. Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 14;10(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01601-z.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33583421 (View on PubMed)

Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Mar 28;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0552-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28351371 (View on PubMed)

Ghai S, Driller M, Ghai I. Effects of joint stabilizers on proprioception and stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2017 May;25:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28262354 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F-473945936

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Position HTO Multicenter NIS
NCT00889304 COMPLETED
Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
NCT03448796 TERMINATED NA