Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Three Surgical Approaches in Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT00983762

Last Updated: 2009-11-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-06-30

Study Completion Date

2020-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A functional outcomes comparison study of three surgical techniques using minimally invasive surgery mini-incision (MIS) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), standard para-patellar TKA and the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed over a 2+ year post-op period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this research study is to compare post-operative knee function of persons who have undergone one of three types of knee arthroplasty for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. A variety of functional performance tests will be assessed and compared using a group of evaluations including: functional activity performance tests and questionnaires; leg strength; knee range of motion; and forces at the knee during a series of activities (walking, bending, stepping etc.) via a motion analysis system. The study will compare the three surgical subject groups and one group of healthy, non-surgical subjects for a total of 100 subjects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MIS knee arthroplasty

Persons scheduled for Minimally Invasive Surgery Mini-Incision (MIS) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

No interventions assigned to this group

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Persons scheduled for Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

No interventions assigned to this group

Standard knee arthroplasty

Persons scheduled for Standard Para-patellar surgery TKA

No interventions assigned to this group

Heathly knee subjects

Persons with healthy knees

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* TKA subjects:

1. Patients requiring primary knee arthroplasty;
2. Knee osteoarthritis;
3. Subject has sufficient quantity or quality of bone support;
4. Subject has no previous or active infection in the affected joint or systemic infection;
5. Subject judged to be available for follow-up through at least 1 year postoperative;
6. All subjects in arthroplasty groups will be between 50-70 years of age
* Healthy subjects:

1. Healthy subjects will have no complaints of knee pain or history of knee surgery or known arthritic knee changes.
2. All subjects will have no history of prior lower extremity arthroplasty surgeries or systemic disease which could confound outcome measures.
3. All healthy persons will be 40-70 years.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Insufficient quantity or quality of bone support resulting from conditions such as cancer, femoral osteotomy, significant osteoporosis or metabolic disorders of calcified tissues;
2. Unable to return for follow up x-rays and clinical evaluation;
3. Unable to comprehending study protocol for any reason;
4. Systemic inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis), previous infection or those requiring revision knee surgery;
5. Subject has an immunological disorder: immunosuppressive treatment characterized by markedly inhibited ability to respond to antigenic stimuli. Examples of such conditions include Subjects who are on immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroid hormones in large amounts, cytotoxic drugs, antilymphocytic serum or irradiation in large doses), Subjects receiving therapy to prevent homograft rejection, Subjects who have a documented history of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or auto-immune diseases;
6. Subject has a neurologic condition that would influence the results of biomechanical analysis of whole body movement.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zimmer Biomet

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henrik Malchau, PhD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2007P001220

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kinematics of Contemporary Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02965690 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA