Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing All-Polyethylene Tibia Total Knee Designs

NCT ID: NCT00894361

Last Updated: 2020-09-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2001-10-31

Study Completion Date

2007-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be designed to compare prospectively, in a randomized fashion, the clinical, functional, and radiographic results of a nonmodular (all-polyethylene tibi/AP) fixed-bearing posterior cruciate substituting design with a modular posterior cruciate substituting rotating platform (RP) design for total knee arthroplasty. Comparing these two designs will afford the investigators information in the following areas:

1. Does a RP design offer improvement in range of motion over a AP design?
2. Does a RP design have improved wear characteristics over a nonmodular AP design?
3. Is there a clear clinical advantage to the RP design that justifies its increased cost?

Answering these questions will allow surgeons to use RP designs appropriately in different demand populations.

This study was designed to address the questions of whether an RP design offers improvement in ROM, Knee Society scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores, selected Medical Outcomes Short-Form Health Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores or radiographic measures, over an APT design. The investigators' primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in these outcome measures at a minimum two year followup. A secondary hypothesis based on the anticipated long-term followup of this group was that there would be no difference in implant survival.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rotating-platform design TKA

patients who were randomized to receive the rotating platform mobile-bearing TKA design

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TKA surgery with the rotating platform mobile-bearing knee design

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Depuy Sigma RP rotating platform design

all-polyethylene tibia design TKA

patients who were randomized to receive the all-polyethylene tibial component design

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TKA surgery with the all-polyethylene tibia knee design

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Depuy Sigma fixed-bearing design with all-polyethylene tibia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TKA surgery with the rotating platform mobile-bearing knee design

Depuy Sigma RP rotating platform design

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TKA surgery with the all-polyethylene tibia knee design

Depuy Sigma fixed-bearing design with all-polyethylene tibia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* generally accepted clinical and radiographic criteria for primary total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* substantial angular deformity or bony deformity requiring structural grafting or modular augmentation were excluded at the discretion of the principle investigator
* patients whose mental function precluded them from responding to our standard questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Depuy, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Terence J. Gioe, M.D.

Chief, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery, Minneapolis VAMC

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Terence J Gioe, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Minneapolis VAMC, Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minneapolis VAMC

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gioe TJ, Glynn J, Sembrano J, Suthers K, Santos ER, Singh J. Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Sep;91(9):2104-12. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01442.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19723986 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MVA-3028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cemented vs. Cementless TKA
NCT04597684 TERMINATED NA