Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-06
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will compare the functional outcome of two implants that have been designed to provide patients with a functionally stable knee throughout its range of motion. The different design roles in preventing implant-related mid-flexion instability remain unknown. The functional outcome and stability of these implants will be tested non-invasively with 3D motion capture technology.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Radiological, Clinical, Functional Outcomes Between Anatomically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT04183985
Stability of Contemporary Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02861794
Stability of the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis
NCT02577978
Total Knee Arthroplasty: Functional and Clinical Outcomes
NCT01811563
Comparison of Anatomically Aligned and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients
NCT04181216
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Medacta GMK-Sphere implant consists of a fully congruent medial compartment which allows freedom of movement in the lateral compartment. Both femoral and tibial components are also available in a range of 13 sizes, allowing the surgeon to find a 'best fit' for each patient. These design features are aimed to mimic the movement of a natural healthy knee, potentially preventing implant-related mid-flexion instability.
The DePuy Synthes Attune implant design aims to provide patients with optimal functional outcome. The femoral component of this implant has a gradually reducing radius, and the tibial component an S-shaped post-cam mechanism. These features are designed to facilitate smooth movement and stability during flexion.
The comparative functional outcomes and stability in gait, and other activities of daily living has not been established for the two different TKR design concepts. Functional assessments will be carried out on TKR patients pre- and post-operatively. These assessments will non-invasively quantify the knee's stability, range of motion, strength as well as walking kinematics using 3D motion capture technology. As mid-flexion instability is most notable during downhill walking, patients will be required to walk downhill on a treadmill as part of this study, to better investigate the phenomenon of mid-flexion knee instability.
This study will not involve any invasive procedure in addition to the standard of care. As such, the research burden is minimal. The main ethical issue may be that patients will not be randomised into one of the two proposed groups.
Patients will receive either the GMK-Sphere implant or the Attune implant according to their surgeon's usual practice. Surgeons who specialise in the GMK-Sphere implant will only implant the GMK-Sphere for this study, and surgeons who specialise in the Attune implant will only implant the Attune. This allows surgeons to undertake the prosthesis with which they are expert, and also limit potential surgical error in the case of surgeons having to randomise patients to different designs on the same list.
Patients will be seen by the trial team on 3 separate occasions:
1. Routine pre-admission clinic: Recruitment, collection of patient information and questionnaire data and completion of pre-operative physical tests (including gait analysis with 3D motion capture technology)
2. Routine post-operation clinic: Six-weeks post-operative physical tests (including gait analysis with 3D motion capture technology) and questionnaire data
3. Annual post-operation clinic: 1-year post-operative physical tests (including gait analysis with 3D motion capture technology) and questionnaire data
Collection of baseline data during pre-admission clinic (standard care except physical tests):
* Descriptive: Patient demographics (sex, age, height, mass, BMI), diagnosis, pattern of OA, medical co-morbidity
* Questionnaire Data
* Oxford Knee Score - A joint specific questionnaire which asks patients on the level of pain and function they believe to have in their affected knee.
* EQ5D - A questionnaire on patients' perception of their overall health. It contains a visual analogue scale where patients have to choose on a scale of 0-100 how well they believe their general health to be.
* SF12 - A general Quality of Life score. It has mental and physical components.
* Forgotten Joint Score - This asks questions not covered in the OKS on patient perception of their knee that are important to know following TKA. It focuses on other aspects of outcome other than joint pain and function.
* Expectation questionnaire - This asks what the patients expect from the surgery. The investigators use this to gauge whether patients are expecting to achieve too much or too little post-op. This is important for understanding post-operative patient satisfaction.
All questionnaires ask different questions (although there is some overlap). Together, they give an overall view of the patients' perception of their general health and knee specific problems. As such, they are all deemed necessary for this investigation.
There are separate scoring sheets for these subjective quantitative scores. The results are typically presented as a Mean ± SD score for each questionnaire (provided the data is normally distributed). All are valid in the English language.
• Non-invasive Physical Tests: Range of knee movement, knee muscular strength, lower limb kinematics during level (0°)- and downhill (7.5°)-walking
Collection of follow-up measures by trial team between operation and post-operative visit (standard care):
• Surgical complications
Collection of data during routine follow-up clinics:
6 weeks post-operation (standard care except physical tests):
* Questionnaire Data: Oxford Knee Score, SF12, EQ5D, Forgotten Joint Score
* Non-invasive Physical Tests: Range of knee movement, knee muscular strength, lower limb kinematics during level (0°)- and downhill (7.5°)-walking
12 weeks post-operation (standard care):
* Descriptive: Radiographic measurement of alignment (Non-invasive)
1 year post-operation (standard care except physical tests):
* Questionnaire Data: Oxford Knee Score, SF12, EQ5D, Forgotten Joint Score, Satisfaction questionnaire
* Descriptive: Late complications
* Non-invasive Physical Tests: Range of knee movement, knee muscular strength, lower limb kinematics during level (0°)- and downhill (7.5°)-walking
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Medacta GMK Sphere
Half of the patients will be implanted with the Medacta GMK Sphere total knee arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Parts of the knee joint diseased by osteoarthritis are replaced by metal and plastic prostheses.
DePuy Synthes Attune
Half of the patients will be implanted with the DePuy Attune total knee arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Parts of the knee joint diseased by osteoarthritis are replaced by metal and plastic prostheses.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Total knee arthroplasty
Parts of the knee joint diseased by osteoarthritis are replaced by metal and plastic prostheses.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients requiring bone augmentation
* Patients with collateral ligament incompetence
* Valgus deformity \>5 degrees.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medacta International SA
INDUSTRY
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leela C Biant, FRCSEd Tr & Orth
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Manchester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Trafford General Hospital
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B00116
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.