Analysis of Patient Outcome Questionnaire Following Primary Knee Replacement

NCT ID: NCT03132077

Last Updated: 2020-05-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1301 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The intention is to explore whether there are factors which help us to understand why some patient outcomes are not successful and identify prediction factors for progression. It will also assess the available outcomes pre- and post-surgery may explore prediction tools for good/poor progression and improve the patient's selection, patient preparation or timing for surgery.

The focus of this project is exploring outcomes post-primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the available pre/post-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, EQ-5D General Health Questionnaire, Visual Analogue (VAS) for pain, age and smoking status data, and correlations between these data and post operation patient satisfaction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of disability around the world; it is the most common chronic condition in primary care in the UK. By 2030 it is predicted to be the greatest cause of disability in the general population. An effective end-stage treatment for knee OA is knee-replacement surgery.

In England and Wales, the number of knee-replacement procedures recorded by the National Joint Registry in 2013 was 91,703, which represents an increase of 0.9 % over 2012. The data analysis by the National Joint Registry and the Office of National Statistics suggests that, by 2030, primary TKAs will increase by 117% from the 2012 level. Subsequently, TKA revision surgeries are expected to increase incrementally by 332%.

Post-TKA, 75-85% of patients report satisfaction with surgery outcomes, while the remaining 15-25% are dissatisfied. Total knee arthroplasty's success has traditionally been evaluated from the surgeon's perspective, e.g. the presence of surgical complications or implant survival. This is gradually changing to involve the patient in measuring health outcomes and decision-making processes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have evolved to explore patient perspectives by monitoring the quality of care in health organizations and conducting clinical trial outcomes. National Health Service used PROMs to measures health gain in patients undergoing hip replacement, knee replacement, varicose vein and groin hernia surgery in England, based on responses to questionnaires before and after surgery.

This retrospective cohort study will investigate outcomes 1 and 3 years post-TKA, and factors that may predict good/poor progression based on previously gathered data, which may minimize the effect of prospective data collection bias. The study will explore accurate prediction factors of post-TKA satisfaction at Stockport NHS Foundation Trust operates at Stepping Hill Hospital which is a busy District General Hospital, with a large orthopaedic department. Outcome following knee replacement surgery is closely monitored and matches the best performing units in the UK. Potentially, reliable outcome prediction could, however, improve patient selection for surgery, as appropriate timing for surgery depends on patient symptoms and efficient patient preparation for surgery if it is to be cost-effective. Accurate preoperative prediction is crucial to minimize the potential for unrealistic expectations which may improve their satisfaction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

satisfaction post total knee arthroplasty

The focus of this project is exploring outcomes post-primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using the available pre/post-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, EQ-5D General Health Questionnaire, Visual Analogue (VAS) for pain, age and smoking status data, and correlations between these data and post operation patient satisfaction.

total knee arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgical intervention for end stage of knee osteoarthritis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

total knee arthroplasty

surgical intervention for end stage of knee osteoarthritis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

total knee replacement surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The present study is a retrospective randomised analysis of outcomes 1 years post-TKA.
* All individuals have previously consented to give access to their data for research studies.
* All patients' records prospectively gathered data spanning more than 3 years will be reviewed, if they were scheduled for primary unilateral TKA for end-stage knee osteoarthritis and were in a stable and controlled medical condition at Stepping Hill Hospital.
* The records will be considered eligible if the following criteria are met:

* At least one preoperative record no more than 6 months prior to the surgery, 1-year postoperative records available.
* In regards to the questionnaires, (OKS, UCLA and EQ-5D), a maximum of one missing question for UCLA and two for OKS questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria

Potential research records were excluded from the study if;

* The patient had more than acceptable missing datum for any outcome score.
* The patient did not consent to the use of their records for research purposes.
* No preoperative record or the postoperative records not available.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Salford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bodor Bin sheeha

Principal Investigator -PhD student at University of Salford

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stockport NHS Foundation Trust

Stockport, Manchester, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bade MJ, Wolfe P, Zeni JA, Stevens-Lapsley JE, Snyder-Mackler L. Predicting poor physical performance after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2012 Nov;30(11):1805-10. doi: 10.1002/jor.22140. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22539338 (View on PubMed)

Brown K, Kachelman J, Topp R, Quesada PM, Nyland J, Malkani A, Swank AM. Predictors of functional task performance among patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Mar;23(2):436-43. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318198fc13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19197199 (View on PubMed)

Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22398175 (View on PubMed)

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences USA: LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: SAGE Publications Ltd,.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hossain FS, Konan S, Patel S, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Haddad FS. The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty: are we there yet? Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):3-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.34434.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25568406 (View on PubMed)

Jagger, C., Matthews, R., Spiers, N., Brayne, C., Comas - Herrera, A., Robinson, T., . . . Croft, P. (2006). Compression or expansion of disability?: forecasting future disability levels under changing patterns of diseases: King's Fund.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Klit J, Jacobsen S, Rosenlund S, Sonne-Holm S, Troelsen A. Total knee arthroplasty in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures. J Arthroplasty. 2014 May;29(5):912-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.035. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24269097 (View on PubMed)

Lungu E, Desmeules F, Dionne CE, Belzile EL, Vendittoli PA. Prediction of poor outcomes six months following total knee arthroplasty in patients awaiting surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Sep 8;15:299. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-299.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25201448 (View on PubMed)

Noiseux NO, Callaghan JJ, Clark CR, Zimmerman MB, Sluka KA, Rakel BA. Preoperative predictors of pain following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1383-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.034. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24630598 (View on PubMed)

Patel A, Pavlou G, Mujica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35170.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26224824 (View on PubMed)

Portney, L., & Watkins, M. (2009). Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. London: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

usalford- retrospective

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.