Medical Stone Expulsive Therapy for Acutely Obstructed Ureteric Calculi
NCT ID: NCT05977647
Last Updated: 2025-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
However, limited data is available worldwide, on the effect of silodosin to treat DUS. A multi-center study is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of therapy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Silodosin vs Tamsulosin as MET
NCT05570084
COMPARISON OF SILODOSIN AND TAMSULOSIN IN MEDICAL EXPULSIVE THERAPY OF DISTAL URETERIC CALCULI
NCT05790902
Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Treatment of Ureteral Stones
NCT02369744
Comparison of Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy in Patients With Ureteral Stones
NCT06999135
Differential Effect of Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin on Stone Clearance After Extra-corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT01560091
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are multiple approaches to the management of ureteric stones, which has evolved over the last 20 years, specifically due to advancements in technology, use of ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) as minimally invasive treatment options. However, these interventions are quite expensive and may lead to multiple complications. According to the complication rate of minimally invasive interventions is 2.5%.
As a first treatment option for small-size ureteric stones, α-blockers are now being used for medical expulsive therapy (MET) instead of invasive procedures. As observed through two meta-analyses there is high evidence of the therapeutic benefit of α-blockers in the treatment of DUS seen to be 52% and 44% higher than those patients who have not received any treatment.
There is an endorsement of the use of a-blockers as a management option for ureteric stones by the American Urology Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology. The α1A- adrenoceptors have proven to play an important effect in intervening contraction of the human ureter, induced by phenylephrine. Silodosin (selective α1-adrenoceptor blocker) in the human ureter was found more efficacious than Tamsulosin (1D-adrenoceptor blocker) in non-adrenaline-induced contractions.
However, limited data is available worldwide, on the effect of silodosin to treat DUS. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no study done on the use of silodosin as MET for DUS in the context of Pakistan. Therefore, this study will be able to provide meaningful data to find the efficacy and safety of silodosin in comparison to Tamsulosin as MET in ureteric stone.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. A permuted block randomization technique will be used
2. A block represents a separate center/site of enrollment.
3. There will be 19 recruitment centers
4. Each center will enroll total 20-25 subjects
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tamsulosin
Patients with lower ureteric stone will be randomized through permuted block randomization equally into two group. 120 patients will be on tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily, therapy will be given for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Tamsulosin Oral Capsule
Patient will be enrolled in one of study arm through randomization.
Silodosin
Patients with lower ureteric stone will be randomized through permuted block randomization equally into two group. 120 patients will be on Silodosin 8 mg once daily. Therapy will be given for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Tamsulosin Oral Capsule
Patient will be enrolled in one of study arm through randomization.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tamsulosin Oral Capsule
Patient will be enrolled in one of study arm through randomization.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who give informed consent
* Stone located in the distal 1/3rd of ureter (Single, unilateral and radiopaque ureteral calculus 5 to 10 mm visible on the CT-KUB± X-ray KUB within the ureter
* Serum creatinine level within the normal range (adult men, 0.74 to 1.35 mg/dL \& 0.59 to 1.04 mg/dL)
* Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
Exclusion Criteria
* Evidence of any other renal stone simultaneously present or at any location
* Hydronephrosis Grade 3 (Moderate) \& Grade 4 (Severe) Patients with eGFR \<60 ml/min/1.73m2
* Signs of infection including temperature \>38ºC or Urinalysis with any of the following: Positive Leukocyte Esterase, Positive Nitrates, or White Blood Cell Count \>5/hfp in the setting of a positive urine culture (defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of \>100,000 CFU)
* Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications or drug abusers
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Patient suffering from urinary tract infection, ureteral surgery, and existing DJ stents.
* Clinical jaundice
* Any forms of anatomical obstructions in the urinary tract
* The previously suffering from postural hypotension
* Any other disease jeopardizing participation in trial and could lead to increase patient health risks
* History of allergic reactions with the study drugs (Silodosin or Tamsulosin)
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Getz Pharma
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Salman El Khalid, MBBS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Kidney Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
North west general hospital
Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GTZ-MSE-001-23
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.