Silodosin, Tadalafil Alone vs. Silodosin Plus Tadalafil as MET for Lower Ureteric Stones

NCT ID: NCT05789732

Last Updated: 2023-03-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

168 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-30

Study Completion Date

2022-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare the efficacy of silodosin, tadalafil versus silodosin plus tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) for lower ureteric stones.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The global incidence of urolithiasis, a disease with a high recurrence rate, is increasing. Urolithiasis is one of the most common disorders of the urinary tract with a lifetime prevalence of up to 15% with men affected three times more than women.

Urolithiasis causes recurrent stone formers to experience a decline in quality of life, and there is an increasing socioeconomic burden associated with the management of urolithiasis. Improved quality of life may also have increased its prevalence. A significant proportion, about 1/5th of urinary tract stones, is found in the ureter, of which 2/3rd is seen in the distal ureter. Initially, a colicky pain of various grades presents with ureteric stone. It is one of the most common problems that compel a patient to an emergency room.

Methods to manage ureteral stones include conservative treatment, pharmacological treatment (e.g., medical expulsive therapy), shock wave lithotripsy, and surgical treatment. Thus, urologists must select the appropriate treatment for each patient (i.e., non-surgical or surgical). Today, medical expulsive therapy has become the most used modality of treatment for urolithiasis. During this treatment, the ureter smooth muscle is treated via various drugs by different mechanisms.

Blocking alpha-(α-) 1 adrenergic receptor, especially in the distal third decreases basal smooth muscle contraction and causes propulsive antegrade peristalsis helping stone expulsion. By increasing the intraureteral pressure gradient around the stone, alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists eject distal ureteral stones.

Significant pathological changes can occur when ureteric stones are impacted. +is can cause an inflammatory reaction with mucosal edema which could further worsen the ureteric obstruction, increasing the risk of impaction and retention. However, selective alpha-1 blockers, such as tamsulosin and silodosin, have been the treatment of choice, with proven efficacy in multiple clinical trials. Silodosin is a more selective α-1A adrenoceptor blocker with a better stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin.

Recently, a newer Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, tadalafil, has shown action on the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling pathway of smooth muscles, resulting in increased levels of cyclic guanosine monophosphate, causing ureteric relaxation.

Due to its smooth muscle relaxation mechanism, tadalafil has received US Food and Drug Administration approval to treat many urinary tract diseases. Therefore, the combination of silodosin and tadalafil drugs is aimed to facilitate stone passage by better ureteric relaxation and reducing intramural ureter pressure. Although there have been few similar studies using various combinations, comparing the efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil vs. silodosin are very few, and these studies have taken longer duration of treatment (4 to 6 weeks) which might have affected the outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Ureteric Stones Medical Expulsive Therapy Tadalafil Silodosin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo group

Patients in this group will receive placebo treatment once daily.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive placebo treatment once daily.

Silodosin group

Patients will receive Silodosin 8 mg once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Silodosin

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive Silodosin 8 mg once daily.

Tadalafil group

Patients will receive Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tadalafil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Silodosin and Tadalafil

Patients will receive Silodosin 8mg in combination with Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Silodosin and Tadalafil

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive Silodosin 8mg in combination with Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

Patients will receive placebo treatment once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Silodosin

Patients will receive Silodosin 8 mg once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tadalafil

Patients will receive Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Silodosin and Tadalafil

Patients will receive Silodosin 8mg in combination with Tadalafil 5 mg once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 168 patients aged \>18 years old.
* Both sexes.
* Diagnosed with lower ureteric stone from 5mm to 10mm in size.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with multiple or bilateral ureteric stones
* single kidney or impairment of renal function
* Urinary tract infection (UTI)
* Marked hydronephrosis
* Patients presenting with severe intractable pain and requiring emergency intervention
* Any urologic anomalies or history of ureteral surgery
* Pregnancy
* Pediatric populations
* Ischemic heart disease
* Congestive cardiac failure
* Complicated hypertension
* Patients on concomitant treatment with nitrates or calcium channel blockers.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Benha University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tamer Abd El-Wahab Diab

Lecturer of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Benha University Hospitals

Banhā, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Rc 22-3-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Silodosin vs Tamsulosin as MET
NCT05570084 UNKNOWN PHASE3
Silodosin in Management of Lower Ureteral Stones
NCT06381206 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2