Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin for Treatment of Ureteral Stones
NCT ID: NCT02369744
Last Updated: 2020-06-23
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2013-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Subjects who qualify and consent are randomized to a two-week course of either silodosin or tamsulosin. They are also given prescriptions for standard of care medications for pain and nausea, as well as a pain diary. They receive a follow-up phone call after one week to remind them of their follow-up appointment, ask about adverse events, and determine if their stone has passed. They have a follow-up visit with study staff at the end of their two week treatment to collect their pain diary, pill count, adverse events, and to determine if their stone has passed. Study participation ends after this follow-up visit.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Differential Effect of Silodosin Versus Tamsulosin on Stone Clearance After Extra-corporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT01560091
Medical Stone Expulsive Therapy for Acutely Obstructed Ureteric Calculi
NCT05977647
Comparative Study for Medical Therapy for Lower Ureteral Stones
NCT06707181
Comparison of Silodosin and Tamsulosin for Medical Expulsive Therapy in Patients With Ureteral Stones
NCT06999135
Effectiveness of Silodosin in Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Pelvic Stone From 4 to 10 mm.
NCT02090439
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects will then be discharged to home as per routine care with instructions to drink plenty of fluids, and will be given a strainer and asked to attempt to catch their ureteral calculus. They will also be given a standardized prescription analgesic package (Percocet 5/325mg #20, Motrin 600mg #60, Zofran OD 4mg #20 with standard dosing instructions) and a Visual Analog Pain Scale diary to be filled out daily. Subjects will be given standardized discharge instructions as per standard of care that will include indications for immediate ED return for signs and symptoms of infection or MET failure (fever, worsening pain, vomiting, lethargy, unsteadiness, syncope or inability to tolerate oral pain medications). As per standard of care, they will be instructed to return to the ER immediately if they develop any of these symptoms. Finally, the subject's contact information will be collected at the time of enrollment and a follow-up appointment will be scheduled for them with Urology in 4 weeks to ensure they get appropriate and timely specialty follow-up. This follow-up is also standard of care, and will occur after the subject's participation in the study ends.
Each subject will be scheduled to return to the ER in 2 weeks to be seen by the research staff for data collection. They will be asked to bring their pill bottle and visual analog pain scale diary to this visit. If the subject reports having passed a stone consistent with their initial imaging, or have resolution of their pain to suggest they passed the stone unseen, this will conclude their participation in the study. However, if they are still having symptoms, their case will be categorized as an outpatient treatment failure and the subject will be registered to be seen by an ER Physician and a Urology consult will be ordered, concluding their participation in the study. This is current standard of care, and will be covered by insurance. Any subject that has an unscheduled visit to an ER for a ureterolithiasis-related complaint will also be considered an outpatient treatment failure. This will also conclude their participation in this study.
To ensure follow-up, subjects will be called one week after enrollment. They will be reminded of their 2-week follow-up appointment and the need to bring in their pill bottles. Each subject will also be asked if they have passed the stone or had resolution of the pain. The will be reminded that they must follow-up even if they are no longer having symptoms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Silodosin
Subjects in the Silodosin Group will be given silodosin 8 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks.
Silodosin
8mg tablet, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
Tamsulosin
Subjects in the Tamsulosin Group will be given tamsulosin 0.4 mg tablets, one tablet to be taken PO each day for two weeks.
Tamsulosin
0.4 mg Tab, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Silodosin
8mg tablet, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
Tamsulosin
0.4 mg Tab, 1 tab PO daily for 2 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-diabetic
* Unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter
* Serum creatinine level within normal range
* Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
* Ability to make informed medical decisions regarding consent
* Willingness to follow up in the ER in two weeks
Exclusion Criteria
* Age \<18
* Signs of infection including Temperature \>38º C or Urinalysis with any of the following: Positive Leukocyte Esterase, Positive Nitrates, or White Blood Cell Count \>5/hfp in the setting of a positive urine culture (defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of \>100,000 CFU)
* Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications
* Patients already taking an alpha adrenergic antagonist medication
* Pregnant women
* Prisoners
* No working phone number
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
William Boroughf, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Einstein Healthcare Network
James Gardner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Einstein Healthcare Network
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MA, Kaufman SR, Bradford TJ, Saint S, Wei JT, Hollenbeck BK. Medical therapy to facilitate urinary stone passage: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006 Sep 30;368(9542):1171-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69474-9.
Parsons JK, Hergan LA, Sakamoto K, Lakin C. Efficacy of alpha-blockers for the treatment of ureteral stones. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):983-7; discussion 987. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.023.
Pedro RN, Hinck B, Hendlin K, Feia K, Canales BK, Monga M. Alfuzosin stone expulsion therapy for distal ureteral calculi: a double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2244-7; discussion 2247. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.141. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
Steinberg PL. Re: Karim Bensalah, Margaret Pearle and Yair Lotan. Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones. Eur urol 2008;53:411-9. Eur Urol. 2008 Aug;54(2):469; author reply 469. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.077. Epub 2008 Feb 4. No abstract available.
Hermanns T, Sauermann P, Rufibach K, Frauenfelder T, Sulser T, Strebel RT. Is there a role for tamsulosin in the treatment of distal ureteral stones of 7 mm or less? Results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.076. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Turk C, Wolf JS Jr; American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc; European Association of Urology. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007 Dec;52(6):1610-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039. No abstract available.
Kobayashi S, Tomiyama Y, Hoyano Y, Yamazaki Y, Sasaki S, Kohri K. Effects of silodosin and naftopidil on the distal ureter and cardiovascular system in anesthetized dogs: comparison of potential medications for distal ureteral stone passage. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.106.
H Lepor et al. Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study To Define Electrocardiographic Effects Of Silodosin. Journal of Urology 179(4), May 2008
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HN 4441
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.