The Effects of Mental and Physical Fatigue to Force Production in Adults
NCT ID: NCT05973396
Last Updated: 2023-08-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-18
2023-07-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In adults, how does physical and mental fatigue in combination compared to those who are just physically fatigued affect average peak height in performance of five CMJ with hands on hips.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study of Strength Testing in Overweight Women With or Without Insulin Resistance
NCT01862757
Strength Training Augmenting Rehabilitation
NCT05097092
Does Inspiratory Muscle Training Improve Functional Capacity in Subjects With Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
NCT02584205
Stronger: Muscle Strengthening for Menopause
NCT06375356
Inspiratory Muscle Strength Training in Adults With Obesity
NCT05459636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, this does not show if a mentally fatigued and physically fatigued individual have any negative implications towards a more dynamic and reactive test and conditions that mimic sport more than static balancing or linear walking. It is even noted in reactive times of post ACLr (one of the most common sports related injuries) have lower reactive times in agility test With ACLr having a high level or rate or reinjury on surgical side and nonsurgical side as well as known alterations of the cerebellum and specifically the primary sensory cortex.Understanding how much a mental and physical fatigue can impact reactive cognition and force production can be vital key in not only sports performance and management, but also risk or injury and be associated in the plan of returning an athlete to sport as power and force production is a key determinant of performance in many individual and team sports. It is noted that physical activities directly enhance mental fatigue significantly, but it is widely unresearched objectively how much or when physical fatigue directly impacts mental cognition and decision making properties to an individual. In sport it is crucial to act and react to be able to be successful. Multidirectional and team sports involve constant mental cognition in terms of visual, auditory interpretation and cognition, ability to recognize patterns and to finally physically perform tasks in a highly efficient manner.
The goal of an athlete is to be conditioned to play their best whether that is the first minute of the game or its last. That means making the correct decision and physically performing it. However, in a fatigued state can the athlete properly perform what is needed to be done in a safe and effective manner that is comparable to a not fatigued state.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control: Physical Fatigue only
Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort
Physical Fatiguing Task only
Control group: 20-25 minutes \[Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort\] without mentally fatiguing task during low intensity effort pace
Experiment: Mental and Physical Fatigue
Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort with mentally fatiguing task during low intensity effort pace with stroop testing during 50 seconds
Physical and Mental Fatiguing Task
Experimental group: 20-25 minutes \[Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort\] with mentally fatiguing task during low intensity effort pace (which includes: stroop test)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical Fatiguing Task only
Control group: 20-25 minutes \[Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort\] without mentally fatiguing task during low intensity effort pace
Physical and Mental Fatiguing Task
Experimental group: 20-25 minutes \[Rogue Echo Bike 20 intervals of 10 second of maximal-submaximal effort to 50 seconds of recovery low intensity effort\] with mentally fatiguing task during low intensity effort pace (which includes: stroop test)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lower extremity surgery within the last two years Rationale: Puts participant more at risk of injury since inducing fatigue and a maximal power effort Source: Redcap Questionnaire, Baseline visit
3. Medical restrictions for full activity Rationale: Puts participant more at risk of injury since inducing fatigue and a maximal power effort Source: Redcap Questionnaire, Baseline visit
21 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Parker University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Katherine Pohlman, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Director of Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ParkerFit
Dallas, Texas, United States
Parker University
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related Info
Related Info
Related Info
Related Info
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PUIRB-2022-11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.