Influence of Autonomy on Motor Learning in People With Parkinson's Disease
NCT ID: NCT05960331
Last Updated: 2025-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-21
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Whether autonomy supported learning can benefit motor learning in PD patients
* Whether autonomy supported learning can enhance intrinsic motivation and/ or information processing of PD patients in learning a new task.
* Whether autonomy supported learning can facilitate cortical excitability change after practicing a new task.
Participants will be recruited into two groups (Self-control group, SC; and yoked group, YK) to learn a finger-pressing trajectory matching task
* Participants in SC group will have choice over feedback schedule during trial practice
* Participants in YK group will receive feedback with no-choice during trial practice Researchers will compare the retention test performance to see if autonomy supported learning will lead to better learning effect.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Self-controlled Practice on Motor Learning and Motivation in Parkinson's Disease
NCT07028515
Exogenous Effects of Standard Medical Care (Dopamine) on Motor Learning of an Upper Limb Task in Parkinson Disease
NCT02600858
Single Bout Exercise on Learning in PD
NCT04189887
The Impact of Standard Medical Care (Dopamine) and Practice on Postural Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease
NCT02593812
The Effect of Exercise Intervention on Posture, Trunk Flexibility and Spine Function in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
NCT06536478
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Self-control group
Participants will be able to choose over feedback schedule when practicing finger-pressing trajectory matching task.
Autonomy supported learning
The ability of learners to participate in determining their own behaviour, which is the feedback schedule regarding their practice performance in this study.
Yoked group
Participants will receive feedback, which was determined by their counterpart in self-control group, with no-choice when practicing finger-pressing trajectory matching task.
Practice with predetermined feedback
Learners practice the motor task, while the feedback is provided according to their counterpartner
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Autonomy supported learning
The ability of learners to participate in determining their own behaviour, which is the feedback schedule regarding their practice performance in this study.
Practice with predetermined feedback
Learners practice the motor task, while the feedback is provided according to their counterpartner
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* able to follow instructions to perform the tasks (Montreal Cognitive Assessment ≥ 24)
* no surgery and injury in upper extremities in recent 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Parkinson's disease dementia
* symptom of severe tremor in upper extremities (score ≥ 3 in Question 15 to 18 of UPDRS-III)
* deep brain stimulation or pacemaker implanted
* medical history of seizure
* a blood-relative with history of epilepsy
* unstable medical conditions
* pregnancy
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carter MJ, Ste-Marie DM. Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Dec;24(6):1879-1888. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1250-7.
Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Campos T. Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2012 Apr;35(4):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202304047RINC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.