Dexmedetomidine or Lidocaine for Lessening the Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Intubation

NCT ID: NCT05941767

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-12

Study Completion Date

2024-01-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, surgical stimulation, and extubation unleash remarkable sympathetic activity and are associated with transient but significant hemodynamic changes. The need to blunt these noxious responses effectively has led to using several techniques and pharmacological agents, local anesthetics, beta-adrenergic-blockers, calcium channel antagonists, and opioids with varied success. This study aims to evaluate the effect of nebulized and intravenous either dexmedetomidine or lidocaine for attenuating the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation are a significant concern for the anesthesiologist. Laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation, surgical stimulation, and extubation unleash remarkable sympathetic activity and are associated with transient but significant hemodynamic changes. These hemodynamic derangements can be lethal in patients with multiple comorbidities. The need to blunt these noxious responses effectively has led to using several techniques and pharmacological agents, local anesthetics, beta-adrenergic-blockers, calcium channel antagonists, and opioids with varied success. This study aims to evaluate the effect of nebulized and intravenous either dexmedetomidine or lidocaine for attenuating the hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia Intubation Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dexmedetomidine nebulization

The patient will receive nebulized dexmedetomidine via face mask nebulizer (1mcg/kg) 20 minutes before induction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine nebulization

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient will receive nebulized dexmedetomidine via face mask nebulizer 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Lidocaine Nebulization

The patient will receive nebulized lidocaine 4% (3 mg /kg) added to 2 ml normal saline 0.9% 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine nebulization

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient will receive nebulized lidocaine 4% (3 mg /kg) 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Dexmedetomidine IV

The patient will receive an intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (1 ml= 4 mcg) via a syringe pump and will be started at a dose of 1 mcg/kg 20 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine IV

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient will receive intravenous infusion via a syringe pump of dexmedetomidine (1 ml= 4mcg) started at a dose of 1 mcg/kg 20 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Lidocaine IV

The patient will receive 1.5mg/kg intravenous lidocaine 2% completed to 10 ml with normal saline 0.9% intravenous 90 seconds before induction of general anesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine IV

Intervention Type DRUG

The patient will receive 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (1 ml = 20mg) completed to 10 ml with normal saline 0.9% intravenous 90 seconds before induction of general anesthesia.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine nebulization

The patient will receive nebulized dexmedetomidine via face mask nebulizer 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine nebulization

The patient will receive nebulized lidocaine 4% (3 mg /kg) 10 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine IV

The patient will receive intravenous infusion via a syringe pump of dexmedetomidine (1 ml= 4mcg) started at a dose of 1 mcg/kg 20 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine IV

The patient will receive 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (1 ml = 20mg) completed to 10 ml with normal saline 0.9% intravenous 90 seconds before induction of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Precedex (200 mcg/2ml) Lidocaine 2% (20 mg/ml) Precedex Lidocaine 2% (20 mg/ml)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I \& II. BMI: ((≤ 35 kg/m2)). The patients are to be scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Mallampati grade I, II

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncooperative patient. History of allergy to study drugs. Hemodynamically unstable patient. Renal or hepatic dysfunction or hypertensive patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zaki Saleh Taha, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and pain management

Yasser Mohamed Nasr, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and pain management

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of medicine, Zagazig University

Zagazig, Al-Sharkia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sriramka B, Warsi ZH, Sahoo J. Effects of adding dexmedetomidine to nebulized lidocaine on control of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation: A randomized clinical trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jan-Mar;39(1):11-17. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_93_21. Epub 2022 Feb 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37250266 (View on PubMed)

Misra S, Behera BK, Mitra JK, Sahoo AK, Jena SS, Srinivasan A. Effect of preoperative dexmedetomidine nebulization on the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and intubation: a randomized control trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Apr;74(2):150-157. doi: 10.4097/kja.20153. Epub 2020 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32434291 (View on PubMed)

Mahajan L, Kaur M, Gupta R, Aujla KS, Singh A, Kaur A. Attenuation of the pressor responses to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with intravenous dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate under bispectral index-controlled anaesthesia: A placebo-controlled prospective randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 May;62(5):337-343. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1_18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29910490 (View on PubMed)

Soltani Mohammadi S, Maziar A, Saliminia A. Comparing Clonidine and Lidocaine on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation in Controlled Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar 27;6(2):e34271. doi: 10.5812/aapm.34271. eCollection 2016 Apr.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27247914 (View on PubMed)

Mahjoubifard M, Heidari M, Dahmardeh M, Mirtajani SB, Jahangirifard A. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine, Lidocaine, and Fentanyl in Attenuation Hemodynamic Response of Laryngoscopy and Intubation in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020 Jul 1;2020:4814037. doi: 10.1155/2020/4814037. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32695159 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Stress Response to intubation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hemodynamic Response to Intubation
NCT02844894 UNKNOWN PHASE4