Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Improving Intubating Conditions Without the Use of Muscle Relaxant

NCT ID: NCT06409377

Last Updated: 2024-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-25

Study Completion Date

2024-05-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Tracheal intubation is usually facilitated by the administration of anesthetic drugs including a muscle relaxant. Over the past few years, several factors have led researchers to consider omitting neuromuscular blocking agents for tracheal intubation. (1, 2) Despite the frequent use of NMBAs in clinical practice, side effects associated with NMBA use can be particularly concerning such as anaphylaxis, cardiovascular effects related to histamine release or sympathomimetic properties, Bronchospasm, and prolonged paralysis. (3) Therefore, many studies (4, 5) focused on the possibility of performing tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. The challenge was to find the correct choice and dose of induction agent, opioid, or adjuvant drug to produce adequate intubating conditions without cardiovascular side effects. Dexmedetomidine is a potent and highly selective alpha-2 receptor agonist with sympatholytic, sedative, amnestic, and analgesic properties. It inhibits sympathetic activity thus terminating the pain signals and thereby blunts the pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods: the study is designed to be prospective randomized double blinded study. 74 ASA I, II patients will be divided into 2 groups group D and group C, 37 patients in each group. Group D will receive single dose of dexmedetomidine 1.5 mcg /kg in 50 ml normal saline over 10 min IV infusion and Group C will receive 50 ml normal saline over 10 min IV infusion. Intravenous induction of anesthesia will be done using propofol (2 mg/Kg), fentanyl (1 mcg/Kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/Kg) in the control group versus propofol (2 mg/Kg), fentanyl (1 mg/kg) and normal saline in the dexmedetomidine group. After 2 minutes of mask ventilation with 2% sevoflurane, endotracheal intubation (ETI) with 7.5mm endotracheal tube for male patients and a 7mm endotracheal tube for female patients will be performed by an experienced anesthiolgist Base line readings including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP),) will be recorded and continuous measurements will be recorded till 5 minutes after intubation. Scoring of Intubation Conditions as follows: Intubation conditions will be evaluated using a scoring system, which includes 5 factors:

score 1 2 3 4 Laryngoscope: Easy Fair Difficult Impossible Vocal cords: Open Moving Closing Closed Coughing: None Slight Moderate Severe Jaw Relaxation: Complete Slight Stiff Rigid Limb movement: None Slight Moderate Severe

The score was interpreted into 3 categories: excellent, acceptable and poor conditions:

* Excellent conditions: received a score of 1 for all the 5 factors.
* Acceptable conditions: received a score of 2 for any of the 5 factors.
* Poor conditions received a score \>2 for any of the 5 factors. Both excellent and acceptable conditions was defined as successful intubations. Poor conditions was defined as failed intubations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Muscle Relaxation Dexmedetomidine

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients was allocated according to the randomly generated numbers into 2 groups; 37 patients in each group. The Dexmedetomidine Group (D): Patients received dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg), propofol (2mg/kg), and fentanyl (1 μg/kg). The Control Group (C): Patients received propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg).
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
74 Adults were enrolled in the study and randomized using computer generated random numbers and divided into two groups. For the purpose of double blinding, two investigators participated in this study; an anesthesiologist who was not participating in the study prepared the study drug infusions and was responsible for drug administration. Another anesthesiologist who was unaware of group's allocation was responsible for the intubation and data collection.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The Dexmedetomidine Group (D)

Patients received dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg), propofol (2mg/kg), and fentanyl (1 μg/kg).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Precedex 200 MCG in 2 ML Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients received dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg) as single injection over 10 minutes.

The Control Group (C)

Patients received normal saline of volume over 10 minutes.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

C group:

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients received propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Precedex 200 MCG in 2 ML Injection

Patients received dexmedetomidine (1.5 μg/kg) as single injection over 10 minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

C group:

Patients received propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg).

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

C group: Patients received propofol (2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1 μg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg).

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status I, II.
* Age 18- 60 years old of both sexes.
* Mallampati I, II
* Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia and tracheal intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years and ≥ 60 years
* Pregnancy
* Emergency surgery or full stomach
* Mallampati III , IV
* Renal or Hepatic patients
* Patients with any cardiac condition
* Patients with suspected difficult airway; e.g., high neck circumference, high body mass index (≥30 kg/m2), airway masses, mouth scars, neck scars, limited neck extension or history of snoring.
* Any patient on regular intake of beta blockers or calcium channel blockers
* Patients with any known hypersensitivity or contraindication to dexmedetomidine,
* Patients with significant neurological, psychiatric, or neuromuscular disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Theodor Bilharz Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Moshira sayed mohamed

Assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Theodor Bilharz research institute

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Theodor Bilharz research institute

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PT (822)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine in IVRA
NCT05123170 COMPLETED PHASE4