Efficacy and Safety of Administration of High Levels of Protein to Critically Ill Patients.
NCT ID: NCT05918757
Last Updated: 2024-06-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
200 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the appearance and degree of ICUAW in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation treated with two different doses of protein (1.5 g/kg/day vs.1.0 g/kg/day).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Protein Dosing Strategies in Critically Ill Patients: Comparing Actual Body Weight and Fat-Free Mass Approaches in an Observational Cohort Study
NCT07312708
Protein Consumption in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03048487
PRotEin Provision in Critical IllneSs
NCT04633421
The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03160547
Enhanced Protein Intake to Support Muscle Protein Synthesis in ICU
NCT06714240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite protein synthesis is increased, this is insufficient to compensate for the high protein degradation rate, which leads, among others, to muscle deterioration resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. This muscle destruction has been implicated in the early appearance of Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW). Although the pathophysiology of ICUAW is multifactorial, protein intake may play an key role in its treatment. However, protein intake cannot reduce muscle destruction, but it can stimulate protein synthesis.
Current evidence supports that the administration of early artificial nutritional support with a high protein intake can improve the clinical course of critically ill patients. However, there is still no consensus on the exact amount of protein needed to be administered to these patients in order to reduce adverse outcomes and prevent ICUAW.
Thus the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a nutritional supplementation containing 1.5 g of protein/kg/day vs 1.0 g of protein /kg/day in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation on the development and degree of ICUAW.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.5 g of protein/kg/day in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation
Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.5 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition
Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.0 g of protein/kg/day in critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation
Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.0 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Protein dose 1.5 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.5 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition
Protein dose 1.0 g/kg/day
Administration of 1.0 g of protein/kg/day via enteral/parenteral nutrition
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ICU admission during the previous 48h
* Patients on expected invasive mechanical ventilation for three days
* Patients with a minimum expected duration of clinical nutrition of at least seven days
* Written informed consent signed by the patient or the patient's legally authorized representative.
* Available central venous access for continuous infusion of the study drugs.
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute renal failure (renal injury stage 3)
* Liver failure (cirrhosis or Child-Pugh Scale \> 5)
* Severe liver failure with International Normalized Ratio (INR) \> 1.7 (prothrombin time \> 50%) and encephalopathy
* Patients with COVID-19-derived pneumonia
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 or \< 18.5 (morbid obesity or previous caloric malnutrition)
* Pregnant patients
* Central Nervous System pathologies (Glasgow \< 6)
* Peripheral Nervous System pathologies interfering with study evaluations
* Patients with cognitive dysfunction/dementia or unable to follow instructions regarding MRC tests
* Severe muscular pathology
* Already participating in another clinical trial
* Impossibility to contact after ICU discharge to carry out the follow-up visit on day 90
* Known hypersensitivity to milk protein or any of the components of the nutritional supplement
* Inborn errors in the amino acid metabolism
* Previous inclusion in the present study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Spanish Society of Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
María Carmen Sánchez Álvarez, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC)
Juan Francisco Fernández Ortega, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Regional de Malaga
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
Castellon, Castelló, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Badajoz
Badajoz, Extremadura, Spain
Hospital de Barbastro
Barbastro, Huesca, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
Parla, Madrid, Spain
Hospital de Manacor
Manacor, Mallorca, Spain
Hospital General Universitario Santa Lucía
Cartagena, Murcia, Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
Hospital General Universitario Los Arcos del Mar Menor
Pozo-Aledo, Murcia, Spain
Hospital Universitario Doctor Josep Trueta
Girona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio
Granada, , Spain
Hospital Universitario San Jorge
Huesca, , Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga
Málaga, , Spain
Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer
Murcia, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021-002329-56
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ASF1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.