The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT04012333

Last Updated: 2022-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-30

Study Completion Date

2022-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary research question: In critically ill patients with nutrition 'risk factors', what is the effect of providing combined EN/PN to the group prescribed a higher dose (≥2.2 grams/kg/day) of protein/amino acid administration compared to a low group prescribed ≤1.2 gram/kg/day (EN only) on patient's functional recovery as measured by 6-minute walk distance just prior to hospital discharge? The hypothesis: Compared to a control group reflective of usual care prescribing practices and an EN only approach, the administration of a higher dose protein/amino acids using EN and PN to nutritionally high-risk critically ill patients will be associated with improved functional outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Positive, neutral, or negative, the results of the EFFORTcombo study will inform the clinical practice in ICU settings around the world. If positive, because of the pragmatic, multicentre nature of this trial, results will be broadly applicable to all critically ill patients worldwide. If the results are negative, it will be ensured that patients no longer receive high-dose protein/amino acid admixtures or possibly, combined EN/PN.

As it relates to critical care nutrition practice in general, there is a long history of practice-changing initiatives. A process of synthesizing (in the form of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines) and disseminating best practice ideas (in the form of web-based repository of tools and information \[see www.criticalcarenutrition.com\]) was established.

Over the past several years, this program of research with leaders of the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and this specific protocol at the annual Clinical Nutrition Week with society leaders, researchers, and the clinical nutrition community at large has been discussed. Partnership with ASPEN will further facilitate both, recruitment initiatives and, importantly, the knowledge translation initiatives. These efforts will increase the likelihood of the uptake of EFFORT results across the world.

This study has both the potential to answer a high-priority clinical question and also transform the new approach in clinical nutrition research. It further represents a unique collaboration between ASPEN, its global partners, and the Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, a methodological support center based in Kingston, Ontario, Canada and managed by Dr. Daren Heyland. If successful, this type of collaboration sets an important precedent for how this community may approach additional research questions related to clinical nutrition. Nested within this larger volunteer-driven registry trial, the aim is to complete a significant sub-study that will establish the role of combined EN/PN in these nutritionally high-risk patients. This protocol pertains to the specifics of this sub-study of combined EN/PN. At the end of the trial, the data from this sub-study will be merged into the results of the overall parent EFFORT Trial (where data points are similar).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nutritional Disorder Critical Illness Malnutrition Frailty Sarcopenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Intervention: enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach protein target of 2.2g/kg/day Control: only enteral nutrition to stay below protein target of 1.2g/kg/day
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Study staff performing the functional outcome measurements will be blinded to study treatment group

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Patients will receive standard care plus OLIMEL 7,6%E or if no central venous access available PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E to reach protein targets: \>2.2g/kg/day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E

Intervention Type DRUG

OLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally.

Standard Care

Patients will receive standard care (enteral nutrition only) to stay below the protein level: \<1.2g/kg/day

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E

OLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. ≥18 years old;
2. Expected to remain mechanically ventilated for an additional 48 hours from screening;
3. And have one or more of the following risk factors that make them at high nutritional risk:

1. Low (≤25) or High BMI (≥35)
2. Moderate to severe malnutrition (as defined by local assessments). We will document the means by which sites are making this determination and capture the elements of the assessment (history of weight loss, history of reduced oral intake, etc.).
3. Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale 5 or more from proxy)
4. Sarcopenia (SARC-F score of 4 or more from proxy)
5. From point of screening, projected duration of mechanical ventilation \>4 days

Exclusion Criteria

1. \>96 continuous hours of mechanical ventilation before enrollment
2. Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
3. Pregnancy
4. The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
5. Absolute contraindication to EN
6. Severe metabolic disorders including electrolyte disorders, uncontrolled hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia.
7. Severe chronic liver disease (MELD-score \>20) or acute fulminant hepatitis.
8. Metabolic disorders involving impaired nitrogen utilization
9. Not ambulating independently prior to illness that lead to ICU admission (use of gait aid permitted)
10. Lower extremity injury or impairments that prevents them walking prior to hospital discharge (e.g. amputation, knee/hip injury)
11. Pre-existing cognitive impairment or language barrier that prohibits outcomes assessment
12. Pre-existing primary severe systemic neuromuscular disease resulting in severe weakness pre-ICU (e.g., Guillain Barre)
13. Intracranial or spinal process affecting motor function
14. Patients in hospital \>5 days prior to ICU admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RWTH Aachen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Stoppe, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Aachen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital RWTH Aachen

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hill A, Heyland DK, Elke G, Schaller SJ, Stocker R, Haberthur C, von Loeffelholz C, Suchner U, Puthucheary ZA, Bear DE, Ney J, Clasen KC, Meybohm P, Lindau S, Laurentius T, Stoppe C. Meeting nutritional targets of critically ill patients by combined enteral and parenteral nutrition: review and rationale for the EFFORTcombo trial. Nutr Res Rev. 2020 Dec;33(2):312-320. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000165. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32669140 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Basel Enteral High Protein Study
NCT02678325 TERMINATED NA
Amino Acid Nutrition in the Critically-ill
NCT02865408 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Protein Supplementation During Dialysis (PROSED)
NCT07237997 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA