The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT ID: NCT04012333
Last Updated: 2022-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE3
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-30
2022-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03160547
The Effect of Higher Protein Dosing in Critically Ill Patients Ultrasound a Sub-study
NCT04242966
Supplemental Enteral Protein in Critical Illness
NCT03170401
Trial of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Under and Over Weight Critically Ill Patients (TOP-UP)
NCT01206166
Optimal Protein Supplementation for Critically Ill Patients
NCT01934595
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As it relates to critical care nutrition practice in general, there is a long history of practice-changing initiatives. A process of synthesizing (in the form of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines) and disseminating best practice ideas (in the form of web-based repository of tools and information \[see www.criticalcarenutrition.com\]) was established.
Over the past several years, this program of research with leaders of the American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) and this specific protocol at the annual Clinical Nutrition Week with society leaders, researchers, and the clinical nutrition community at large has been discussed. Partnership with ASPEN will further facilitate both, recruitment initiatives and, importantly, the knowledge translation initiatives. These efforts will increase the likelihood of the uptake of EFFORT results across the world.
This study has both the potential to answer a high-priority clinical question and also transform the new approach in clinical nutrition research. It further represents a unique collaboration between ASPEN, its global partners, and the Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, a methodological support center based in Kingston, Ontario, Canada and managed by Dr. Daren Heyland. If successful, this type of collaboration sets an important precedent for how this community may approach additional research questions related to clinical nutrition. Nested within this larger volunteer-driven registry trial, the aim is to complete a significant sub-study that will establish the role of combined EN/PN in these nutritionally high-risk patients. This protocol pertains to the specifics of this sub-study of combined EN/PN. At the end of the trial, the data from this sub-study will be merged into the results of the overall parent EFFORT Trial (where data points are similar).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Patients will receive standard care plus OLIMEL 7,6%E or if no central venous access available PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E to reach protein targets: \>2.2g/kg/day
OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E
OLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally.
Standard Care
Patients will receive standard care (enteral nutrition only) to stay below the protein level: \<1.2g/kg/day
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OLIMEL 7,6%E / PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E
OLIMEL 7,6%E will be administered via a central access whereas PeriOLIMEL 2,5%E will be administered peripherally.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Expected to remain mechanically ventilated for an additional 48 hours from screening;
3. And have one or more of the following risk factors that make them at high nutritional risk:
1. Low (≤25) or High BMI (≥35)
2. Moderate to severe malnutrition (as defined by local assessments). We will document the means by which sites are making this determination and capture the elements of the assessment (history of weight loss, history of reduced oral intake, etc.).
3. Frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale 5 or more from proxy)
4. Sarcopenia (SARC-F score of 4 or more from proxy)
5. From point of screening, projected duration of mechanical ventilation \>4 days
Exclusion Criteria
2. Expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments within 7 days from screening
3. Pregnancy
4. The responsible clinician feels that the patient either needs low or high protein
5. Absolute contraindication to EN
6. Severe metabolic disorders including electrolyte disorders, uncontrolled hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, hypophosphatemia.
7. Severe chronic liver disease (MELD-score \>20) or acute fulminant hepatitis.
8. Metabolic disorders involving impaired nitrogen utilization
9. Not ambulating independently prior to illness that lead to ICU admission (use of gait aid permitted)
10. Lower extremity injury or impairments that prevents them walking prior to hospital discharge (e.g. amputation, knee/hip injury)
11. Pre-existing cognitive impairment or language barrier that prohibits outcomes assessment
12. Pre-existing primary severe systemic neuromuscular disease resulting in severe weakness pre-ICU (e.g., Guillain Barre)
13. Intracranial or spinal process affecting motor function
14. Patients in hospital \>5 days prior to ICU admission
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinical Evaluation Research Unit at Kingston General Hospital
OTHER
RWTH Aachen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christian Stoppe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Aachen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital RWTH Aachen
Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hill A, Heyland DK, Elke G, Schaller SJ, Stocker R, Haberthur C, von Loeffelholz C, Suchner U, Puthucheary ZA, Bear DE, Ney J, Clasen KC, Meybohm P, Lindau S, Laurentius T, Stoppe C. Meeting nutritional targets of critically ill patients by combined enteral and parenteral nutrition: review and rationale for the EFFORTcombo trial. Nutr Res Rev. 2020 Dec;33(2):312-320. doi: 10.1017/S0954422420000165. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.