The Basel Enteral High Protein Study

NCT ID: NCT02678325

Last Updated: 2021-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-21

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare the difference in daily protein intake of critically ill patients in two standardized enteral nutrition formulas (20% versus 33% percent) with the same caloric density of 1.2 kcal/ml.

The total amount of protein taken in on day four after starting the early enteral feeding is defined as primary endpoint.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For years, the Surgical Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital Basel has used an early enteral approach for the feeding of critically ill patients with different formulas that have high protein content (20% of total energy). However, the energy goal in the first week is only 20 kcal for normal-weight and 12.5 kcal for obese patients, which results in daily protein amounts of 0.8 to 1 g/kg bodyweight (BW), so that additional protein has to be administered. Due to a suggestion of the dietetic service of the University Hospital Basel, Fresenius Kabi produced a whey based enteral feeding formula for intensive care patients. Specific further adaptations for this patient group included micronutrients and a fatty acid profile as well as low fibres. Surgical Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital Basel now are offered the opportunity to test this formula in clinical practice and hypothesize that this specific high-protein (30% of energy) enteral formula reaches the same amount of daily caloric intake with a higher total daily amount of protein and equal intestinal tolerance compared to a usual intestinal nutritional formula.

In order to test this hypothesis, investigators plan a double-blind, randomized and controlled study with the aim to achieve a target protein quantity of ≥1.3 g/kg BW with an energy target of 20kcal/kg BW per day, based on a new, specifically designed formula for critically ill patients. The amount of protein on day four after starting the early enteral feeding is defined as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints are the total amount of calories, the nitrogen balance on day five as well as side effects like gastric residual content, diarrhoea and constipation. Inclusion criteria were an expected stay at the ICU of four days or longer on admission and 18 years of age or older Exclusion criteria consisted of BMI ≤ 18, pregnancy, intestinal perforation, mechanical intestinal obstruction, terminal state of consuming disease, severely impaired liver function and noradrenaline ≥0.5µg/kg BW/min.. On this purpose, 90 critically ill patients will get either of the two enteral feeding products as described above. In case of the event that an increased protein intake can be obtained by the protein-rich formula, an additional study will investigate the influence of early protein-rich nutrition on skeletal muscle wasting with critically ill patients.

In a pre-study investigators will administer the high protein formula to 20 patients to test tolerance and suitability for the nutritional Targets in question. Tolerance will be defined by the absence of one of the following clinical symptoms :

* Reflux
* Diarrhoea
* Constipation
* Nausea
* Vomiting

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High Enteral Protein Nutrition Muscle Breakdown Autophagy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standardized normal protein enteral nutrition formula

Standardized enteral nutrition formula with a caloric density of 1.2 kcal/ml and protein percentage 20% of the total caloric intake

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standardized normal protein enteral nutrition

Intervention Type OTHER

double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of critically ill patients to explore values of high enteral protein administration (compared to normal enteral protein administration) on muscle breakdown and mortality.

Standardized high protein enteral nutrition formula

Standardized enteral nutrition formula with a caloric density of 1.2 kcal/ml and protein percentage 33% of the total caloric intake

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Standardized high protein enteral nutrition

Intervention Type OTHER

A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of critically ill patients to explore values of high enteral protein administration on muscle breakdown and mortality.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standardized high protein enteral nutrition

A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of critically ill patients to explore values of high enteral protein administration on muscle breakdown and mortality.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standardized normal protein enteral nutrition

double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial of critically ill patients to explore values of high enteral protein administration (compared to normal enteral protein administration) on muscle breakdown and mortality.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (age 18 years or older)
* expected stay at the ICU of four days upon admittance or longer
* expected enteral feeding during at least four days.

Exclusion Criteria

* BMI ≤ 18
* Mechanical intestinal obstruction
* Intestinal perforation
* Severely impaired liver function
* Terminal state of consuming disease
* Noradrenaline ≥0.5µg/kg BW/min
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martin Siegemund, Prof. Dr. MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Deputy Chief Physician, Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tedeschi-Jockers F, Reinhold S, Hollinger A, Tuchscherer D, Kiss C, Gantner L, Ledergerber K, Zimmermann S, Scheuzger J, Huber J, Siegemund M. A new high protein-to-energy enteral formula with a whey protein hydrolysate to achieve protein targets in critically ill patients: a prospective observational tolerability study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar;76(3):419-427. doi: 10.1038/s41430-021-00956-9. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34168292 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016-00041

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.