Training Response Artificial Intelligence Network (TRAIN)

NCT ID: NCT05903573

Last Updated: 2025-12-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-09

Study Completion Date

2028-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will train a machine learning tool to predict response to a cognitive training intervention using baseline brain MRI sequences from older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled clinical trial proposes to test a well-supported Cognitive Training intervention approach for enhancing cognition in older adults who meet criteria for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). The trial will recruit participants recently enrolled in a larger multi-site clinical trial (NCT04171323) at the University of Florida site based on meeting inclusion criteria and willingness to participate in the additional procedures (baseline MRI) required. The intervention will consist of a take-home, iPad-based, adaptive cognitive training (Posit Science Brain HQ Suite) program which participants will be trained to self-administer 2-3 days/week for 60-minutes per session over the course of 16 weeks with a goal of completing 40 training sessions total. Participants randomized to one of four arms of cognitive training or an active control condition. All cognitive training arms will include training on a measure of rapid decision making (Double Decision, similar to the Useful Field of View \[UFOV\] task) in addition to a combination of other subtests to determine which combination best facilitates cognitive gains.

Outcomes: The investigators plan to test the hypotheses that 1) Compared to the active control condition, CT will result in greater than 1.0SD cognitive improvement on several trained tasks (proximal transfer) and untrained cognitive skills (near transfer) for 20% of the sample, while another 20% will continue to experience cognitive decline equivalent to 1.0SD or greater despite adequate adherence to the intervention, and 2) baseline factors related to cognitive function, brain structure, and resting-state brain function can ultimately predict which individuals will show improvement after the 16-week intervention. These baseline factors will be measured by a well-established neuropsychological battery, the useful field of view (UFOV) task, a detailed set of MRI sequences, and their associations with the outcomes will be determined by a type of machine learning known as multi-modal support vector machine (SVM). This type of analysis will allow the integration of a myriad of data points and MRI features to combine into a highly accurate predictive model for cognitive functioning improvement after intervention. The primary outcome measure that will be predicted by the SVM is the UFOV composite score change, which is a combination of post-minus-pre intervention change across UFOV processing speed, selective attention, and divided attention scores. The secondary outcome measure that will be predicted by the SVM is the Posit Composite score, which is a fixed difficulty assessment of proximal transfer effects of the trained tasks. Assessments will occur at baseline (month 1) and at the end of the 16-week intervention (Month 4). Brain imaging will only be performed at baseline. The primary aim is to further establish the efficacy of this well-supported cognitive training paradigm in a population of patients with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and the secondary aim is to distinguish intervention responders from non-responders using baseline cognitive, functional-neural, and demographic data alone.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group: Cognitive Training

Participants will complete computerized cognitive training via Posit Science Brain HQ. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cognitive Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention group will receive cognitive training that provides specific training tasks directed at essential cognitive domains tied to the project's aims and hypotheses (processing speed and working memory) that correspond with the neurocognitive and functional neuroimaging measures to be studied.

Active Control Group: Computerized Cognitive Stimulation

Participants will complete cognitively-stimulating computer activities. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Computerized Cognitive Stimulation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will complete cognitively-stimulating computer activities. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cognitive Training

The intervention group will receive cognitive training that provides specific training tasks directed at essential cognitive domains tied to the project's aims and hypotheses (processing speed and working memory) that correspond with the neurocognitive and functional neuroimaging measures to be studied.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Computerized Cognitive Stimulation

Participants will complete cognitively-stimulating computer activities. The duration is 60 min/day; the frequency is two to three days/wk, for 16 weeks with the goal of completing 40 sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Evidence of changed cognition reported by a close informant as obtained by an interview with a licensed clinical psychologist (PI, Gullett)
* Cognitive performance on one or more standardized neuropsychological measures of verbal or non-verbal memory \> 1.0 standard deviation or more below the normative mean for age and education
* No evidence of reported dependence in instrumental functional abilities (IADLs) despite reported cognitive difficulties
* No evidence of dementia based on cognitive screening (Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score within normal limits for age, education, and sex using the NACC Uniform Data Set (UDS) norms.
* Global clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) score must be equal to 0.5
* Willingness to be randomized into either the educational training (control) or intervention (cognitive training) group
* Able and willing to devote 12 weeks to the intervention with additional time for pre- and post-testing
* Able and willing to perform cognitive and emotional measures both on paper and on a tablet computer
* In line with the recommendations of the SCD task force, an informant must be available. This is to a) obtain information about the participant's complaints and cognitive difficulties on interview, and b) to ascertain validity of self-reported IADL function in regard to instrumental functional activities.

Exclusion Criteria

* Sensory loss (vision, hearing) or motor deficits that would preclude participation in the experimental tasks or neuropsychological assessment
* English as a second language
* Inability to undergo brain imaging due to claustrophobia or implants such as pacemakers, heart valves, brain aneurysm clips, orthodontics, non-removable body jewelry, or shrapnel containing ferromagnetic metal
* Previous major strokes or other known significant brain abnormalities or diseases affecting the brain and/or cognition (e.g., Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, brain surgery, moderate TBI, REM Behavior Sleep Disorder, untreated sleep apnea, etc.)
* Unstable and uncontrolled medical conditions (metastatic cancer, HIV, moderate-severe kidney disease, uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, severe cardiac disease, etc.). No current cancer diagnosis
* Current or past history of major psychiatric disturbance including schizophrenia, or active psychosis, bipolar disorder, current major depressive episode, current alcohol or substance abuse or history thereof within the past six months. The investigators are not excluding individuals who are taking antidepressant or anti-anxiety medications, however, use of these medications will be recorded and data analyzed in post-hoc analyses
* Use of antipsychotics, sedatives, or other medications with significant anticholinergic properties (due to potential influence on memory)
* Use of photo-sensitive medications such as steroids or retin-A within 15 days of the study intervention.
* Previous participation in a cognitive training study within the last 6 months or current involvement in another study involving cognitive, physical or other intervention at the time of participation.
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Aging (NIA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Florida

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph Gullett, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Florida

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Florida

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Joseph Gullett, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

352-294-8631

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joseph Gullett, PhD

Role: primary

352-294-8631

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K23AG080127

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB202201517

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.