Comparaison of Two Prone Position Techniques on Occurence of Pressure Sores in ICU

NCT ID: NCT05894291

Last Updated: 2024-04-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

334 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-24

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a diffuse inflammation of the lungs that occurs in a variety of diseases. According to the Berlin definition, ARDS is characterized by diffuse lung damage in patients with predisposing factors. Understanding the physiology of ARDS has led to improved ventilatory management, which must be protective to ensure adequate oxygenation and CO2 clearance. Prone position (PP) is a technique that can reduce mortality in patients with severe ARDS. PP results in a more homogeneous distribution of pulmonary stress and strain, helping to protect the lung against ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). It also increases the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, improves the pulmonary ventilation-perfusion ratio, decreases PaCO2 and promotes ventilation of the dorsal lung regions. This technique should be offered to all patients with severe ARDS for 16 consecutive hours, to improve survival and weaning success from mechanical ventilation. However, PP has adverse effects. A meta-analysis showed an increased risk of pressure sores, possibly linked to generalized acute inflammation associated with significant cytokine discharge and diffuse lesions of the vascular endothelium. PP also increased the risk of obstruction and displacement of the endotracheal tube. Final positioning in PP, (i.e., the position imposed on the patient for the duration of the PP session) varies from one ICU to another, and is rarely described in scientific articles. There are two main variants:

1. prone , with arms alongside the body
2. prone, swimmer's position

The aim of our study is to show that the "swimmer" PP reduces the occurrence of stage 3 or higher pressure sores, compared with the "arms alongside the body" PP (standard care) at Day 28 post inclusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Pressure Ulcers Stage III

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Swimmer Prone Position

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Swimmer Prone Position

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients will be positioned with the head rotated. This rotation is followed by shoulder elevation/abduction, then 90° elbow flexion for the arm opposite to the head rotation. The hand is placed flat on the bed.

A 60° to 90° flexion is performed on the hip homolateral to head rotation, combined with knee flexion.

The position is changed to the mirror position every 4 hours.

Prone position with arms alongside the body

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prone position with arms alongside the body

Intervention Type OTHER

The head will be positioned either straight or rotated to one side, depending on ICU habits. The arms are positioned symmetrically along the body, palms up. The lower limbs are positioned symmetrically and parallel, knees extended or slightly flexed if a cushion is used on the front of the feet.

Head rotation, if applicable, is performed every 4 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Swimmer Prone Position

Patients will be positioned with the head rotated. This rotation is followed by shoulder elevation/abduction, then 90° elbow flexion for the arm opposite to the head rotation. The hand is placed flat on the bed.

A 60° to 90° flexion is performed on the hip homolateral to head rotation, combined with knee flexion.

The position is changed to the mirror position every 4 hours.

Intervention Type OTHER

Prone position with arms alongside the body

The head will be positioned either straight or rotated to one side, depending on ICU habits. The arms are positioned symmetrically along the body, palms up. The lower limbs are positioned symmetrically and parallel, knees extended or slightly flexed if a cushion is used on the front of the feet.

Head rotation, if applicable, is performed every 4 hours.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intubated patient on invasive mechanical ventilation with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome according to the BERLIN classification with a P/F ratio \< 150, requiring prone position.
* Express consent of the patient or representative or in the absence of this, emergency inclusion procedure
* Health insurance coverage

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with 2 (or more) Prone position sessions
* Patient in whom one of the two positions could not be achieved: (Joint limitation; Neck size that would prevent head rotation; Orthopaedic spinal or segmental trauma; BMI greater than 45)
* Presence of stage 2 or higher pressure ulcers on the anterior parts of the body at screening
* Presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
* Patient already included in the study
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Patient under legal protection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, ORLEANS

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Tours

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UHT of Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Guillaume FOSSAT

Role: CONTACT

0033238651318 ext. 0033

Yosra DRIDI

Role: CONTACT

0033247479792 ext. 0033

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Guillaume Fossat

Role: primary

0238651318 ext. 0033

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22797452 (View on PubMed)

Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, Clavel M, Chatellier D, Jaber S, Rosselli S, Mancebo J, Sirodot M, Hilbert G, Bengler C, Richecoeur J, Gainnier M, Bayle F, Bourdin G, Leray V, Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L; PROSEVA Study Group. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 6;368(23):2159-68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214103. Epub 2013 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23688302 (View on PubMed)

Labeau SO, Afonso E, Benbenishty J, Blackwood B, Boulanger C, Brett SJ, Calvino-Gunther S, Chaboyer W, Coyer F, Deschepper M, Francois G, Honore PM, Jankovic R, Khanna AK, Llaurado-Serra M, Lin F, Rose L, Rubulotta F, Saager L, Williams G, Blot SI; DecubICUs Study Team; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Trials Group Collaborators. Prevalence, associated factors and outcomes of pressure injuries in adult intensive care unit patients: the DecubICUs study. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Feb;47(2):160-169. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06234-9. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33034686 (View on PubMed)

Girard R, Baboi L, Ayzac L, Richard JC, Guerin C; Proseva trial group. The impact of patient positioning on pressure ulcers in patients with severe ARDS: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial on prone positioning. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Mar;40(3):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3188-1. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24352484 (View on PubMed)

Sud S, Friedrich JO, Taccone P, Polli F, Adhikari NK, Latini R, Pesenti A, Guerin C, Mancebo J, Curley MA, Fernandez R, Chan MC, Beuret P, Voggenreiter G, Sud M, Tognoni G, Gattinoni L. Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Apr;36(4):585-99. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1748-1. Epub 2010 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20130832 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDRCB

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DR220257/PROPOSE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.