Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Ventilated Patients Using Two Repositioning Regimens

NCT ID: NCT00847665

Last Updated: 2013-04-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

330 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare a 2-hour versus every 4-hour turning regimen on the incidence of grade \> II pressure ulcers (PU) in patients in ICU on mechanical ventilation ≥ 24h that use alternating-pressure air mattresses (APAMs).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pressure ulcers (PUs) pose a major healthcare challenge and are associated with an increased risk of infection and sepsis, longer hospital stay, and higher hospitalization costs. Their reported incidence in critical care patients varies widely from 1% to 56%. Therefore it is important to take appropriate preventive measures, which can often be successful and less costly than the treatment of established ulcers. Among these measures are the use of pressure-reducing surfaces and repositioning strategies in a protocolized way. Though there is general agreement that critical care patients, including those under mechanical ventilation must use pressure-reducing surfaces, there is no enough evidence in the literature about what is the best repositioning schedule when new, high technology mattresses are used. The use of this new technology has lead to propose that repositioning can be less frequent. In the only clinical trial where this subject (time interval turning) has been addressed (Vanderwee et al, Journal of Advanced Nursing), it is concluded that a turning regimen every 4 hours is equally effective than a 2-hour turning, using this kind of mattresses. Nonetheless this study is not made in critically ill patients, that have more risk factors for developing PUs, the reason we don´t share this findings and recommendations cannot be generalized.

The study hypothesis is that in patients using APAMs, a turning regimen every 2 hour compared to a 4-hour is most effective in the prevention of PUs and could be equally safe.

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of postural turnings every 2 hours compared to every 4 hours on the incidence of grade \> II pressure ulcers (PU) in patients in ICU on mechanical ventilation (MV) ≥ 24h that use alternating-pressure air mattresses (APAMs) The study is an open label, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The main variable is the incidence of Pus grade ≥ II. As secondary variables measures of efficacy and safety of patients will be registered. The study will take place in a 26 bed medical-surgical ICU with APAMs. Randomization will be done between 24h-48h from the beginning of MV. The final analysis will be by intention to treat.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pressure Ulcers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Turning every 4 hours

The four-hours repositioning group patients were turned every four hours following the next sequence: left side, back with a 30º elevation of the head end and the foot end of the bed, right side using the 30º tilt, back.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

repositioning

Intervention Type OTHER

Turning every 4 or 2 hours

Turning every 2 hours

The two-hours repositioning group patients, were turned every two hours following the next sequence: left side, back with a 30º elevation of the head end and the foot end of the bed, right side using the 30º tilt, back.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

repositioning

Intervention Type OTHER

Turning every 4 or 2 hours

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

repositioning

Turning every 4 or 2 hours

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients admitted to the medical-surgical ICU, requiring more than 24 hours of mechanical ventilation.
* Patients on alternating-pressure air mattresses.
* Patients or their legal representative able to provide written informed consent to participate in the study
* Patients whose weight are within the limits accepted by the mattresses (45-140 Kg)
* Over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with pressure ulcer at ICU admission.
* Pregnant patients
* Patients in which informed consent is not obtained in the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Francisco Manzano Manzano

MD,PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francisco Manzano, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves

Granada, Granada, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vanderwee K, Grypdonck MH, De Bacquer D, Defloor T. Effectiveness of turning with unequal time intervals on the incidence of pressure ulcer lesions. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Jan;57(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04060.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17184374 (View on PubMed)

Defloor T, De Bacquer D, Grypdonck MH. The effect of various combinations of turning and pressure reducing devices on the incidence of pressure ulcers. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Jan;42(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.05.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15582638 (View on PubMed)

Krapfl LA, Gray M. Does regular repositioning prevent pressure ulcers? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;35(6):571-7. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000341469.33567.61.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19018196 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.hvn.es

University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HVN-2308-2008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.