Patient-reported Outcome Measures After Implant Placement With Contour Augmentation Procedure
NCT ID: NCT05890170
Last Updated: 2024-09-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-06-08
2024-09-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Dental implants have increased in popularity due to their unique ability to replace teeth. During the planning phase of implant therapy, one of the main parameters assessed is the amount of residual alveolar ridge. Therefore, when tooth replacement therapy via dental implant is considered, adequate management of the site is critical to predictably preserve or reconstruct the architecture of the alveolar ridge, particularly in the anterior aesthetic zone, where its structure play a crucial role in the maintenance of function, health and esthetics. Generally, with appropriate treatment planning and execution, the adequate primary mechanical stability of the dental implant is achieved. However, bone and/or soft tissue augmentation procedures could be needed for the adequate management of deficient edentulous ridges at the time of implant placement, and these types of treatments could considerably increase the risk of morbidity, treatment expenses, and length of treatment time. Nevertheless, Implant placement with additional bone contour augmentation therapies have shown their effectiveness in the short-, mid- and long-term in contemporary dental practice.
However, to the present date, there is no information available in the literature regarding patient-reported outcome measures in patients that received tooth replacement therapy via dental implants with additional contour bone augmentation in the short-, mid- and long-term.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Long-term Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation in Sites With Early Implant Placement
NCT03252106
Effect of Bone Augmentation Simultaneous to Implant Removal on the Prognosis of Reimplantation at the Same Site
NCT07078890
Implant-related Outcomes in the Context of Maxillary Sinus Lifting
NCT06647381
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
NCT01623739
Dimensional Soft and Hard Tissue Alterations Following Single Tooth Extraction in the Anterior Maxilla - A Prospective Clinical Study
NCT02403700
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The findings of this study could bring a valuable perspective on the replacement of missing teeth with dental implants and contour augmentation procedures and would provide clinicians and researchers novel knowledge to guide the clinical decision-making process.
Project population, inclusion and exclusion criteria Subjects who had undergone implant placement procedure involving bone contour augmentation procedure via Guided Bone Regeneration in the anterior esthetic zone at the University of Bern School of Dental Medicine, Switzerland will be screened and invited for a survey. The inclusion criteria are: 1) previous information on the bone augmentation procedure; 2) patients willing to provide an informed consent and attend the study, and 3) absence of any further surgical procedure involving the area of interest. The exclusion criteria are: 1) patients that would not remember where the surgical procedure was performed; 2) unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent. Besides them, and taking into consideration that no further interventions are provided in this study, no further exclusion criteria are defined.
Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study.
The initial recruitment of patients would be based on their confirmation of recalling the implant placement surgery involving the bone contour augmentation procedure via GBR, its purpose, and the area of the oral cavity where the procedure was performed. In the short-term group the patients would be followed at 1-week, 2-weeks, one and three months after surgery. Mid-term would-be patients that had the procedure performed between one up to 5 years. Long-term group would be patients that had the procedure performed from 5 years up to 20 years.
Recruitment, screening and informed consent procedure Patients treated at the Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology at the University of Bern will be potentially be recruited. Patients treated with a dental implant with contour augmentation procedure and required post-operative follow-ups as standard of care (short-term group), or patients that had the intervention done 1 to 5 years ago (mid-term group), or longer than 5 years ago (long-term group) will be invited to participate in this study. Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical/phone screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study without limit of time. No monetary compensation would be provided to the participants in this study.
Study procedures Patients would received questionnaires. Data for the analyses would be extracted only from the questionnaire of patients. Subjects would be asked to mark a 100mm visual analogue scale (VAS) relative to the pain/discomfort that they are/had experienced from the procedure and satisfaction with the procedure. Patients would also been given the option to mark "I do not remember" if they do not recall the answer.
Data from questionnaires would be extracted by an independent investigator. Different variables would be included: 1) age, sex, systemic factors, date of the procedure; 2) location and extension of the procedure; 3) needed for vertical releasing incisions; 4) prescription of additional medication after the 2-week post-op appointment; 5) local anatomical factors (i.e., mid-facial keratinized mucosa width), presence of adjacent teeth; 6) status of post-operative healing; 7) complications during the healing period (i.e., flap dehiscence, necrosis, bone grafting extravasation, pain, infection); 8) operator (resident or faculty member).
The duration of the evaluation visit would take no longer than 10 minutes during the recall appointment. After this visit, in the mid-term and long-term group, no more visits will be necessary for the study outcomes. For the short-term group, during the different follow-up visits as the standard of care after this type of this procedure, the patient would receive similar questionnaires relative to the pain/discomfort and/or satisfaction. Standardized Oral Health Related Questionnaries (OHIP) would be also given to the patients. All the data collected will be encrypted in Redcap Software. The key for the enecryption will be set up and stored by a person who is not involved in the study.
Withdrawal and discontinuation Only patients that would not remember where the surgical procedure was performed or unwilling and unable to sign the informed consent will not be included in this research project. In the short-term group, if the patient during the next follow-up does not want to participate anymore in the study, would not be included in this research project
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short-term
Patients treated at the Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology at the University of Bern will be potentially be recruited. Patients treated with a dental implant with contour augmentation procedure and required post-operative follow-ups as standard of care (short-term group) will be invited to participate in this study. Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical/phone screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study without limit of time.
Patients would received questionnaires. Data from questionnaires would be extracted by an independent investigator. Different variables would be included: 1) age, sex, systemic factors, date of the procedure; location and extension of the procedure...
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Questionnaires and information extracted from the medical records would be collected.
Mid-term
Patients treated at the Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology at the University of Bern will be potentially be recruited. Patients treated with a dental implant with contour augmentation procedure done 1 to 5 years ago (mid-term group) will be invited to participate in this study. Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical/phone screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study without limit of time.
Patients would received questionnaires. Data from questionnaires would be extracted by an independent investigator. Different variables would be included: 1) age, sex, systemic factors, date of the procedure; location and extension of the procedure...
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Questionnaires and information extracted from the medical records would be collected.
Long-term
Patients treated at the Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology at the University of Bern will be potentially be recruited. Patients treated with a dental implant with contour augmentation procedure done \>5 years ago (mid-term group) will be invited to participate in this study. Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical/phone screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study without limit of time.
Patients would received questionnaires. Data from questionnaires would be extracted by an independent investigator. Different variables would be included: 1) age, sex, systemic factors, date of the procedure; location and extension of the procedure...
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Questionnaires and information extracted from the medical records would be collected.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Questionnaires and information extracted from the medical records would be collected.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients willing to provide an informed consent and attend the study
* Absence of any further surgical procedure involving the area of interest.
Exclusion Criteria
* Unwilling or unable to sign the informed consent.
Patients who expressed an interest to participate in this study at the clinical screening examination, would be informed of the purpose and timeline of the study. All potential subjects will be required to read, understand, and sign the consent form, which included a thorough explanation of the study design, as well as expected benefits and possible risks of participating in the study.
The initial recruitment of patients would be based on their confirmation of recalling the implant placement surgery involving the bone contour augmentation procedure via GBR, its purpose, and the area of the oral cavity where the procedure was performed. In the short-term group the patients would be followed at 1-week, 2-weeks, one and three months after surgery. Mid-term would-be patients that had the procedure performed between one up to 5 years. Long-term group would be patients that had the procedure performed from 5 years up to 20 years.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Emilio Couso
Associate professor, and principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Oral Surgery and Stomatology
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. 2005. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 32(2):212-218. 2. Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. 2019. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 46 Suppl 21:195-223. 3. Avila-Ortiz G, Gonzalez-Martin O, Couso-Queiruga E, Wang HL. 2020. The peri-implant phenotype. J Periodontol. 91(3):283-288. 4. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. 2003. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 30(9):809-818. 5. Chapple IL, Wilson NH. 2014. Manifesto for a paradigm shift: Periodontal health for a better life. Br Dent J. 216(4):159-162. 6. Chappuis V, Engel O, Reyes M, Shahim K, Nolte LP, Buser D. 2013. Ridge alterations post-extraction in the esthetic zone: A 3d analysis with cbct. J Dent Res. 92(12 Suppl):195S-201S. 7. Clementini M, Agostinelli A, Castelluzzo W, Cugnata F, Vignoletti F, De Sanctis M. 2019. The effect of immediate implant placement on alveolar ridge preservation compared to spontaneous healing after tooth extraction: Radiographic results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 46(7):776-786. 8. Couso-Queiruga E, Stuhr S, Tattan M, Chambrone L, Avila-Ortiz G. 2021. Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 48(1):126-144. 9. Lim G, Lin GH, Monje A, Chan HL, Wang HL. 2018. Wound healing complications following guided bone regeneration for ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 33(1):41-50. 10. Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SFM, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation with Guided Bone Regeneration: 10-Year Results. J Dent Res. 2018 Mar;97(3):266-274. 11. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):152-62. 12. Buser D, Wittneben J, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. J Periodontol. 2011 Mar;82(3):342-9. 13. Ordinance on Human Research with the Exception of Clinical trials (HRO) https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20121177/index.html 14. Human Research Act (HRA) http://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20121176/201401010000/810.305.pdf 15. Declaration of Helsinki (https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects ) 16. STROBE statement (http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356(07)00436-2/pdf)
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-00754
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.