Patient-reported Outcomes and Esthetics With Single Dental Implants

NCT ID: NCT06571201

Last Updated: 2025-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-15

Study Completion Date

2007-06-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to investigate patient-reported long-term outcomes of single dental implants. Therefore, the aim of the study is to describe patient-reported functional and esthetic outcomes of single dental implants. A secondary aim is to evaluate the objective esthetics of single dental implants.

The primary outcomes are patient-reported experiences regarding the function, cleaning ability, and esthetics of the single dental implant. The esthetics of the single dental implant will also be assessed using the Pink Esthetic/White Esthetic Score Index and considered secondary outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants with one single-dental implant in the esthetic zone were selected. A clinical examination was performed and presence of bleeding (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD) and presence of suppuration was registered. Two questionnaires with visual analogue scales (VAS) were filled in by the participants and intraoral photographs were taken. One of the questionnaires related to satisfaction with function and leaning and the other involved the esthetics of the single dental implant. One dentist reviewed the photographs using the pink esthetic score/white esthetic score (PES/WES) index.

Peri-implant mucositis was established if the presence of bleeding (BOP) and/or suppuration on gentle probing and the absence of bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial bone remodeling at the implant, according to the latest definition of Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. In this study, this was defined as ≤ 2.5 mm apical of the most coronal portion of the intra-osseous part of the implant.

A diagnosis of peri-implantitis was established if the presence of bleeding on gentle probing (BOP) and bone levels of ≥ 3 mm apical of the most coronal portion of the intra-osseous part of the implant, according to the latest classification of Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions.

Parallel to medical records all data was saved in a safe together with a code list. The data was not opened until the study was completed and only by authorized persons with access to the data in the study such as, the principal investigator and the statisticians.

All participants was given oral and written information about the study and signed a written informed consent. The participants was informed that they could drop off whenever they wanted without any explanations. The ethical board approved the study and the investigation was performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki on experimentation involving human subjects.

The IBM SPSS version 28.0 statistical software package (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA) for personal computer was used in the statistical analyses. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the mean and standard deviation (SD). Pearson's χ2 test and Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratios were used to analyze dichotomous data. For categorical data, percentages are given. Estimates (odds ratio, mean difference) are given with the corresponding 95% confidence interval. The significance level for the p value was set at 0.05. No data were missing. Cronbach's alpha was used to test the reproducibility of the PES/WES index used for the objective assessment of the esthetic outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures Patient Satisfaction Implant Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* if only one single dental implant reconstruction in the esthetic zone, defined as teeth from the area of the upper right canine to the upper left canine
* if have filled in two questionnaires
* if answered an oral questionnaire
* if had intraoral photographs taken

Exclusion Criteria

-if there was an edentulous area next to the implant to be studied
Minimum Eligible Age

23 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kristianstad University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Viveca Wallin Bengtsson

Prinicpal Investigator, phD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Viveca Wallin Bengtsson, phD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Kristianstad

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kristianstad University

Kristianstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gehrke P, Lobert M, Dhom G. Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(6):375-84; discussion 385. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00212.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19120783 (View on PubMed)

Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP, Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19228100 (View on PubMed)

Thoma DS, Cosyn J, Fickl S, Jensen SS, Jung RE, Raghoebar GM, Rocchietta I, Roccuzzo M, Sanz M, Sanz-Sanchez I, Scarlat P, Schou S, Stefanini M, Strasding M, Bertl K; working group 2 of the 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Soft tissue management at implants: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 6th EAO Consensus Conference 2021. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):174-180. doi: 10.1111/clr.13798.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34145925 (View on PubMed)

Altay MA, Sindel A, Tezerisener HA, Yildirimyan N, Ozarslan MM. Esthetic evaluation of implant-supported single crowns: a comparison of objective and patient-reported outcomes. Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Jan 7;5(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0153-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30613918 (View on PubMed)

Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Apr;16(2):185-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15777328 (View on PubMed)

Stefanini M, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Marzadori M, Zucchelli G. Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the esthetic area. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):150-164. doi: 10.1111/prd.12215. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29493024 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Single dental implants

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bone Level Tapered Multi-Center Study
NCT02569671 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA