Preoperative Prediction of Flexible Ureteroscopy Outcome in the Treatment of Renal Calculi
NCT ID: NCT05857501
Last Updated: 2023-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
72 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-10
2024-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Multicenter Prospective Research on the Treatment of Low Pole Renal Calculus by Flexible Ureteroscope
NCT03105206
to Study the Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Management of Renal Stones
NCT05648877
Effectiveness of Single Use Flexible Ureteroscopes in Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT04578795
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Safe and effective removal by FURS of multiple and large intrarenal stones, including lower pole calculi, has been documented suggesting that FURS is effective for complex intrarenal stone removal . With the multitude of available procedures, selection of the optimal one for management of renal stone is becoming more challenging.
Established models for predicting the outcomes of SWL and PCNL exist . However, a predictive model for predicting the outcome of URS is still in development , particularly for FURS treatment of renal stones. Four scores have been developed for FURS. Two of these have been compared and validated in different cohorts: the Resolu Unsal Stone Score (RUSS) and modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) score , the other two scores, the S.T.O.N.E score described by Molina et al. and Ito's nomogram.
Many studies have demonstrated that stone volume is the most significant factor predictive of stone-free status (SF) after FURS. The investigators speculate that stone volume combined with other variables might improve prediction of SF after FURS. The aim of the present study is to evaluate various preoperative parameters as predictors of FURS outcome based on the Ito's nomogram
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
abdominopelvic computerized tomography (CT) without contrast
scan combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles around your body and uses computer processing to create cross-sectional images (slices) of the bones, blood vessels and soft tissues inside your body. CT scan images provide more-detailed information than plain X-rays do.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Radiolucent stone resistant to SWL and oral chemical dissolution treatment (≤2cm)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Staghorn stone (stone involving the renal pelvis and more than two calyces).
3. Patient preference of other treatment modality
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Menoufia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
islam mohamed abou bakr mansour
Teaching Assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Abdelgaber Selim, ASS-PROF
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
menofia universtiy
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Sarica K, Turk C, Wolf JS Jr; EAU/AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2418-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107. No abstract available.
Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, Buck C, Conort P, Gallucci M; Working Party on Lithiasis, European Association of Urology. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):362-71. doi: 10.1159/000049803.
El-Nahas AR, Ibrahim HM, Youssef RF, Sheir KZ. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm. BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
Cohen J, Cohen S, Grasso M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3 Pt B):E127-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11352.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, Kuo R, Preminger GM, Nadler RB, Macaluso J, Monga M, Kumar U, Dushinski J, Albala DM, Wolf JS Jr, Assimos D, Fabrizio M, Munch LC, Nakada SY, Auge B, Honey J, Ogan K, Pattaras J, McDougall EM, Averch TD, Turk T, Pietrow P, Watkins S. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol. 2008 May;179(5 Suppl):S69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.140.
Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, Ugurlu M, Tekinarslan E, Kezer C, Aslan R, Muslumanoglu AY. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1384-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10691.x. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):981-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.083. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujii T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol. 2012 Mar;19(3):264-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02931.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, Ray AA, Honey RJ, Pace KT. A clinical nomogram to predict the successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.109.
Kanao K, Nakashima J, Nakagawa K, Asakura H, Miyajima A, Oya M, Ohigashi T, Murai M. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2006 Oct;176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.06.089.
Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, Turna B, de la Rosette JJ; CROES PCNL Study Group. A nephrolithometric nomogram to predict treatment success of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.047. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Imamura Y, Kawamura K, Sazuka T, Sakamoto S, Imamoto T, Nihei N, Suzuki H, Okano T, Nozumi K, Ichikawa T. Development of a nomogram for predicting the stone-free rate after transurethral ureterolithotripsy using semi-rigid ureteroscope. Int J Urol. 2013 Jun;20(6):616-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03229.x. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
Resorlu B, Unsal A, Gulec H, Oztuna D. A new scoring system for predicting stone-free rate after retrograde intrarenal surgery: the "resorlu-unsal stone score". Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):512-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.072. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
Jung JW, Lee BK, Park YH, Lee S, Jeong SJ, Lee SE, Jeong CW. Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urolithiasis. 2014 Aug;42(4):335-40. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0650-7. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
Molina WR, Kim FJ, Spendlove J, Pompeo AS, Sillau S, Sehrt DE. The S.T.O.N.E. Score: a new assessment tool to predict stone free rates in ureteroscopy from pre-operative radiological features. Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):23-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.04.
Ito H, Sakamaki K, Kawahara T, Terao H, Yasuda K, Kuroda S, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J. Development and internal validation of a nomogram for predicting stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones. BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):446-51. doi: 10.1111/bju.12775. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J. Utility and limitation of cumulative stone diameter in predicting urinary stone burden at flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 4;8(6):e65060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065060. Print 2013.
Ito H, Kawahara T, Terao H, Ogawa T, Yao M, Kubota Y, Matsuzaki J. The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):524-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FURS outcome prediciton
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.