Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones

NCT ID: NCT06889051

Last Updated: 2025-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-30

Study Completion Date

2026-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two suction techniques during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for lower calyceal renal stones measuring 1.5-2 cm. The study evaluates Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) versus Antegrade Suction (via percutaneous access) in improving stone-free rates (SFR), reducing operative time, and minimizing complications such as bleeding, ureteral injury, and infection. A total of 120 adult patients will be randomized into two groups, undergoing either flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) or flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with antegrade suction, at Banha University Faculty of Medicine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Nephrolithiasis Urolithiasis Endourology

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing two different suction techniques during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for lower calyceal renal stones. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups:

* Group A (Intervention Group) - flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)
* Group B (Control Group) - flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with Antegrade Suction via percutaneous nephrostomy.

The study will assess stone-free rates (SFR), operative time, and complications.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

This is an open-label trial with no masking, as both the surgeon and patient will be aware of the assigned intervention.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) Group

Patients in this group will undergo retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with the Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS). The FANS facilitates continuous suctioning, improving stone fragment evacuation, reducing intrarenal pressure, and optimizing stone-free rates (SFR).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) is used during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for renal stones (1.5-2 cm). It allows continuous active suctioning, improving stone fragment evacuation, reducing operative time, lowering intrarenal pressure, and optimizing stone-free rates (SFR). The procedure involves inserting the Navigator 10F, 55 cm YIGAOMED FANS over a guidewire, followed by flexible ureteroscopy with PUSEN® 9.2 Fr ureteroscope and laser lithotripsy using Holmium Laser (JenaSurgical® MultiPulse HoPLUS™ 150W).

Antegrade Suction with Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) Group

Patients in this group will undergo retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with antegrade suction, using a percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) access for suctioning from the kidney during the procedure. This method aims to enhance stone fragment clearance and reduce intrarenal pressure without using a ureteral access sheath.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Antegrade Suction via Percutaneous Nephrostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This technique involves antegrade suction from the kidney during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) without the use of a ureteral access sheath. A percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tract is created using an 18G needle, and a 6F renal dilator is placed and fixed to the skin, allowing for direct suctioning from the collecting system. Following this, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is performed using the PUSEN® 9.2 Fr ureteroscope and Holmium Laser (JenaSurgical® MultiPulse HoPLUS™ 150W) for stone fragmentation. This technique aims to improve stone clearance while minimizing ureteral trauma associated with access sheaths.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS)

The Flexible \& Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) is used during retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for renal stones (1.5-2 cm). It allows continuous active suctioning, improving stone fragment evacuation, reducing operative time, lowering intrarenal pressure, and optimizing stone-free rates (SFR). The procedure involves inserting the Navigator 10F, 55 cm YIGAOMED FANS over a guidewire, followed by flexible ureteroscopy with PUSEN® 9.2 Fr ureteroscope and laser lithotripsy using Holmium Laser (JenaSurgical® MultiPulse HoPLUS™ 150W).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Antegrade Suction via Percutaneous Nephrostomy

This technique involves antegrade suction from the kidney during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) without the use of a ureteral access sheath. A percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tract is created using an 18G needle, and a 6F renal dilator is placed and fixed to the skin, allowing for direct suctioning from the collecting system. Following this, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) is performed using the PUSEN® 9.2 Fr ureteroscope and Holmium Laser (JenaSurgical® MultiPulse HoPLUS™ 150W) for stone fragmentation. This technique aims to improve stone clearance while minimizing ureteral trauma associated with access sheaths.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (≥18 years old)
* Patients diagnosed with renal stones (1.5-2 cm) confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)
* Patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) as the primary treatment approach
* Patients with no active urinary tract infection (UTI) at baseline
* Patients who provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with anatomical anomalies (e.g., horseshoe kidney, PUJ obstruction)
* Patients with a single functioning kidney
* Pregnant women
* Patients with a history of urological malignancy
* Patients with active bleeding disorders or those on anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely discontinued
* Patients at high risk for anesthesia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Benha University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tamer Abd El-Wahab Diab

Lecturer of Urology, Faculty of Medicine.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tamer Diab, MD

Role: CONTACT

01003583264 ext. +2

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MD-290-2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA