Flexible Ureteroscopy With and Without Ureteral Access Sheath in Treatment of Large Renal Stones
NCT ID: NCT06122129
Last Updated: 2024-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
84 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-08
2024-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940
Optimal Drainage After Flexible Ureterorenoscopy; Prospective Assessment of Perioperative Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life Through a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04643145
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942
Outcomes of Using FANS With FURS in TTT of Lower Calyceal Stones.
NCT07238803
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Many authors have used flexible ureteroscope (FURS) with laser fragmentation as proved treating modality with high efficacy. Although percutaneous extraction of large renal stones is still the first option, it has higher and more severer complications than flexible ureteroscopy.
FURS has developed into a standard diagnostic and treatment modality for upper urinary stone disease, transitional cell carcinoma and ureteral strictures. Indeed, more recently FURS is becoming a minimally invasive competitor to percutaneous nephrolithotomy for larger kidney stones as well as an accepted modality for localized treatment of small upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma.
The use of ureteral access sheath (UAS) is widely recognized as a technique utilized to keep the intrarenal pressure low when performing FURS for larger and more complex stones, although some authors advocate its use for most renal stones. UASs are now produced with varying characteristics including various lengths, diameters, materials, dilator tip designs, radiopaque markers, and stiffness. However, it also rises surgical costs and may injure the ureteral wall.
Most common reasons cited by urologists for using a UAS are to facilitate repeated entrance into the ureter and collecting system (as a time-saver), lower intrarenal pressure and protection of ureteroscope and ureter when extracting stone fragments. UAS has encouraged urologists in the fragmentation of large stones; it facilitates multiple entries and stone extraction during FURS.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath
Stones will be treated by flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath
Flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath
The flexible ureteroscope either directly or via an access sheath, depending on the size of the ureter, a 9.5/11.5 Fr or a 12 Fr access sheath will be used.
Flexible ureteroscope without ureteral access sheath
Stones will be treated by flexible ureteroscope without ureteral access sheath
Flexible ureteroscope without ureteral access sheath
Ureteroscopy will be carried out without a ureteral access sheath
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath
The flexible ureteroscope either directly or via an access sheath, depending on the size of the ureter, a 9.5/11.5 Fr or a 12 Fr access sheath will be used.
Flexible ureteroscope without ureteral access sheath
Ureteroscopy will be carried out without a ureteral access sheath
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Both sexes.
* Patients with upper ureter and renal stones scheduled for flexible ureteroscope.
Exclusion Criteria
* Larger stones (11 cm) where the routine use of an access sheath will be felt appropriate to aid multiple passes of the scope.
* Known ureteric strictures.
* Concomitant ureteric stones.
* Patients with narrow ureter where ureteral access sheath was anticipated to be difficult.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New Valley University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Waheed Fawzy Abdelrasol
Lecturer of Urology, faculty of medicine, New Vally University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
New Valley University
New Valley, New Valley Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
0739-20233
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.