Outcome of URS in Fresh Versus Recurrent Cases of Stone Ureter
NCT ID: NCT06592469
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ESWL vs URS in Management of Upper Third Ureteric Calculi
NCT03559738
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940
to Study the Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Management of Renal Stones
NCT05648877
Role of Nephrolithometric Scoring Systems in Prediction of PCNL Outcomes in Adult
NCT04158570
Ultraslow SWL Versus Slow SWL for Ureteric Stones With High Attenuation Value
NCT03795545
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fresh cases
Outcome of URS in fresh stone ureter
Ureteroscopy
URS is done to each group to reveal outcome of stone free rate in fresh versus recurrent cases of stone ureter
Recurrent cases
Outcome of URS in recurrent cases of stone ureter post ESWL ,URS , open surgery
Ureteroscopy
URS is done to each group to reveal outcome of stone free rate in fresh versus recurrent cases of stone ureter
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ureteroscopy
URS is done to each group to reveal outcome of stone free rate in fresh versus recurrent cases of stone ureter
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Stone 15mm or less.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusing participation.
* Pregnant woman.
* Active urinary tract infection.
* Comorbidities prevent intervention including bleeding tendency or uncorrectable coagulation profile.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amr Moustafa Hussein Soliman
Resident doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fathy Gaber Mahmoud Alanany, Prof of URO
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Mahmoud M. Shalaby, Prof of URO
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Nasreldin Abdeal Mohammed, Ass Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine Assiut University
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Factors predicting duration and success of semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stones in different localizations
Assessment of factors affecting the spontaneous passage of lower ureteric calculus on the basis of lower ureteric calculus diameter, density, and plasma C-reactive protein level. Urology Annal
Stone composition independently predicts stone size in 18,029 spontaneously passed stones
Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Pediatric Urolithiasis
Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives
Semirigid Ureteroscopy: Step by Step
Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period
Complications of 2735 retrograde semirigid ureteroscopy procedures: a single-center experience
Endoscopic features of impacted ureteral stones
Predictive factors for intraoperative complications in semirigid ureteroscopy: analysis of 1235 ballistic ureterolithotripsies
Revisiting the predictive factors for intra-operative complications of rigid ureteroscopy: a 15-year experience
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Outcome of Ureteroscopy
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.