Primary Ureteroscopy for Acute Obstructive Nephropathy Due to Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Non-randomized Feasibility and Safety Trial

NCT ID: NCT07177313

Last Updated: 2025-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ureteroscopy (URS) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for the management of ureteral and renal stones (1). While the procedure is generally safe and effective, patient factors such as renal function, operative time, and ASA classification may influence outcomes (2).

Ureteral stones were found to be associated with deteriorated kidney function in affected patients (3). In cases of elevated urea and creatinine levels, pre-stenting of ureteroscopy was indicated (4). Limited number of studies have directly assessed the primary ureteroscopy without preoperative stenting outcomes in patients with normal versus deteriorated renal function. Understanding the impact of renal function on URS outcomes can help. A single procedure translates to reduced patient burden through fewer hospital visits, less time spent in the operating room, and a quicker return to daily activities, thus improving comfort and convenience. This approach also yields cost savings by eliminating the expenses associated with a second procedure, including hospital stays, anesthesia, and surgical supplies. Moreover, immediate stone removal via primary URS offers faster symptom relief and avoids potential stent-related complications such as pain, infection, and migration. However, the decision to forego staging must be carefully weighed against individual patient risk factors and stone complexity, as those with severe obstruction, infection, or compromised renal function may still benefit from pre-stenting to optimize procedural safety and outcomes.

This study aims to evaluate whether elevated creatinine levels influence stone-free rates, complication rates, and procedural success in patients undergoing primary URS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Obstructive Nephropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Patients presenting with acute obstructive uropathy and uremic renal impairment (defined as serum creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dL)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ureteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients presenting with acute ureteral obstruction who undergo primary ureteroscopy (URS).

Group2

Patients with normal renal function (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m²) undergoing primary URS for ureteral stones.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ureteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

patients presenting with acute ureteral obstruction who undergo primary ureteroscopy (URS).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ureteroscopy

patients presenting with acute ureteral obstruction who undergo primary ureteroscopy (URS).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Adults (\>18 years) with acute unilateral ureteral obstruction confirmed by:
* Non-contrast CT (stone size ≥5mm)
* Hydronephrosis on ultrasound

* Planned for primary URS (no prior stenting/nephrostomy)
* Renal function eligibility:
* Acute deterioration (elevated serum Cr and urea) serum creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dL but less than 5 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria

• Systemic contraindications to URS:

* Uncorrected coagulopathy (INR \>1.5)
* Active UTI/sepsis (requiring drainage-first approach)
* Severe cardiopulmonary compromise (ASA class ≥IV)

* Patients with hypercalcemia.
* hyperkalemia \>6.5 mEq/L
* Metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.1)
* Patients with pulmonary edema.
* Patients with uremic encephalopathy.
* Bilateral obstruction
* Known ureteral stricture distal to stone
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Mostafa Khedr

Residant doctor at Assiut university hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Acute Obstructive Nephropathy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Flexible vs Semi-rigid URS
NCT07247617 RECRUITING NA