UPURS Trial for Patient-centered Management of Symptomatic Obstructing Stones

NCT ID: NCT05715086

Last Updated: 2025-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-23

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial studying the management of symptomatic ureteral stones. This study will compare upfront ureteroscopy vs observation and delayed intervention for patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Management of symptomatic ureteral stones is variable across the United States due to a lack of clear, patient-centered guidelines. For patients who do not meet criteria for emergent stenting, the decision to recommend upfront definitive treatment (ureteroscopy, ESWL) or medical expulsion therapy is influenced by factors such as practice setting, insurance status, and day of the week. This has resulted in health disparities and delays in care that disproportionately affect vulnerable patient populations.

For patients presenting to the emergency department with a symptomatic ureteral stone investigators will randomize into Group A: Upfront Ureteroscopy or Group B: Delayed intervention and observation. Both arms are considered standard of care for patients presenting with the above diagnosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ureteral Stone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A prospective, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial with two study arms.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A (Upfront ureteroscopy)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ureteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Upfront ureteroscopy

Group B (Observation/delayed ureteroscopy)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ureteroscopy

Upfront ureteroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Presenting to the Emergency Department (ED)
* Adult (\> 18 yo)
* ≥5mm ureteral stone diagnosed on CT scan
* Presence of symptoms (pain, nausea, vomiting, hematuria)

Exclusion Criteria

* Strict indication for stent
* Stone burden not amenable to Ureteroscopy (URS)
* Dirty urine analysis (UA) or positive urine culture (UCx)
* Transplant kidney
* Presence of conduit
* Comorbidities not optimized for surgery
* Strong preference for surgery or observation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Chi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Catherine Arevalo, BA

Role: CONTACT

415-514-0918

Heiko Yang, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tom Chi, MD

Role: primary

Heiko Yang, MD

Role: backup

513-8862172

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

22-37665

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Follow-Up of Ureteral Stones ≤4 mm
NCT07176026 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 UNKNOWN PHASE4