Systemic Stress Prevention Via Application SysLife© for Companies

NCT ID: NCT05828693

Last Updated: 2024-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-29

Study Completion Date

2024-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of systemic stress prevention via SysLife© application in a prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), with participants' subjective stress experience as the primary endpoint.

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Systemic prevention serves the prophylaxis of disease and/or illness, and/or damage to health. For social subsystems such as professional teams, there however still is a lack of effective preventive or health-promoting interventions. With the Prevention Act introduced in 2015 (Social Security Code, Germany: § 20 para. 1 SGB V), prevention now has to address the social context of people's everyday life as well ("setting/life-world approach"). Positive changes in terms of reduced stress perception or acute exposition to stress factors are supposed to be accompanied by improved systemic, psychological and physical well-being. This RCT will investigate the efficacy of the systemic stress prevention program SysLife© application.

Methods: This prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT compares an experimental group (n = 19) receiving SysLife© application with a control group (n = 19) with subsequent intervention, i.e. the SysLife@ application 4 months after the experimental group. The primary endpoint is the participants' subjective stress experience.

The data collection encompasses 5 measurement points: t1, i.e. baseline for the experimental group; t2: 2-month follow-up; t3: 4-month follow-up for the experimental group and baseline for the control group; t4: 6-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group; t5: 8-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group).

This allows for the calculation of trends considering the potential efficacy of the SysLife© application in the RCT design on the one hand (n = 19, 2-study arm approach), and in a cumulative study (n = 38, 1-study arm approach).

Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?

Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.

Questionnaires: Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI); Trier Stress Inventory (TICS); Experience in Social Systems (EXIS), Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Further items: demographic data, use of additional health care interventions, user behavior and effect of the SysLife© application.

Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT comparing SysLife© application with a waiting group. For study purposes, it is a challenge to implement SysLife© application in organizational contexts such as teams: systemic prevention is an innovative health-promoting approach which is not (yet) covered by the German health insurance companies; the SysLife© application is an innovative program in digital health management with high flexibility how to approach it while being standardized in its structure; though companies are increasingly interested in health-promoting interventions for their employees, they are sparing considering the investment of time and financial resources in occupational health care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress, Psychological Stress, Systemic Application

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SysLife©

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.

Waiting group with subsequent intervention

Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.

Group Type OTHER

SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SysLife©

Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design

Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Minimum age: 18 years
* Interest in active use of the SysLife© application
* Knowledge of German at native language level or the ability to use German language independently (at least B-level)
* Only persons capable of giving consent will be included in the study
* Written consent to participate after information about the study

Exclusion Criteria

* No written consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sysba solutions GmbH

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Murtfeldt Kunststoffe GmbH & Co. KG

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Witten/Herdecke

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christina Hunger-Schoppe

Chair for clinical psychology and psychotherapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christina Hunger-Schoppe, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Witten/Herdecke

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Witten/Herdecke University

Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hunger C, Bornhauser A, Link L, Geigges J, Voss A, Weinhold J, Schweitzer J. The Experience in Personal Social Systems Questionnaire (EXIS.pers): Development and Psychometric Properties. Fam Process. 2017 Mar;56(1):154-170. doi: 10.1111/famp.12205. Epub 2016 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26858173 (View on PubMed)

Barth, I., Immel, N. & Hunger-Schoppe, C. (2023). Systemische Prävention. [in print, Publisher: Kohlhammer]

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Satow, L. (2012). Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI). available under: http://www.drsatow.de/tests/stress-und-coping-inventar/

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Schulz, P., Schlotz, W. & Becker, P. (2004). Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Grosse M, Grawe K. BERN INVENTORY OF TREATMENT GOALS: PART 1. Development and First Application of a Taxonomy of Treatment Goal Themes. Psychother Res. 2002 Mar 1;12(1):79-99. doi: 10.1080/713869618.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22471333 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SysLife©

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Strategies for Responding to Stress
NCT03289156 COMPLETED NA