Systemic Stress Prevention Via Application SysLife© for Companies
NCT ID: NCT05828693
Last Updated: 2024-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
49 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-29
2024-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?
Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Asynchronous Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction to Reduce Burnout in Licensed Clinical Social Workers
NCT05472935
Mindfulness for Reducing Work-Related Stress
NCT07082491
Digital Interventions to Understand and Mitigate Stress Response
NCT05923398
Stress Coping Strategy on Perceived Stress Levels and Performance During a Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT01826318
Self Help Intervention to Decrease Stress
NCT01242865
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: This prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT compares an experimental group (n = 19) receiving SysLife© application with a control group (n = 19) with subsequent intervention, i.e. the SysLife@ application 4 months after the experimental group. The primary endpoint is the participants' subjective stress experience.
The data collection encompasses 5 measurement points: t1, i.e. baseline for the experimental group; t2: 2-month follow-up; t3: 4-month follow-up for the experimental group and baseline for the control group; t4: 6-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group; t5: 8-month follow-up for the experimental group and 2-month follow-up for the control group).
This allows for the calculation of trends considering the potential efficacy of the SysLife© application in the RCT design on the one hand (n = 19, 2-study arm approach), and in a cumulative study (n = 38, 1-study arm approach).
Research Question: Which implementations are necessary, based on the experience from this pilot RCT, to ensure the quality of a subsequent confirmatory RCT?
Hypothesis: We expect improvement of participants' subjective stress experience, goal achievement, systemic functioning in private and organisational social systems while using the SysLife© application.
Questionnaires: Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI); Trier Stress Inventory (TICS); Experience in Social Systems (EXIS), Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). Further items: demographic data, use of additional health care interventions, user behavior and effect of the SysLife© application.
Discussion: To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first prospective, interventive, balanced, monocentric, explanatory pilot RCT comparing SysLife© application with a waiting group. For study purposes, it is a challenge to implement SysLife© application in organizational contexts such as teams: systemic prevention is an innovative health-promoting approach which is not (yet) covered by the German health insurance companies; the SysLife© application is an innovative program in digital health management with high flexibility how to approach it while being standardized in its structure; though companies are increasingly interested in health-promoting interventions for their employees, they are sparing considering the investment of time and financial resources in occupational health care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.
SysLife©
Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.
Waiting group with subsequent intervention
Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.
SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design
Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SysLife©
Use of the SysLife© application, with 2-, 4-, 6- and 8-month follow-up.
SysLife©, as intervention after closing the RCT-design
Use of the SysLife© application after 4-month waiting period, with 2- and 4-month follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Interest in active use of the SysLife© application
* Knowledge of German at native language level or the ability to use German language independently (at least B-level)
* Only persons capable of giving consent will be included in the study
* Written consent to participate after information about the study
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sysba solutions GmbH
UNKNOWN
Murtfeldt Kunststoffe GmbH & Co. KG
UNKNOWN
University of Witten/Herdecke
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Christina Hunger-Schoppe
Chair for clinical psychology and psychotherapy
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christina Hunger-Schoppe, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Witten/Herdecke
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Witten/Herdecke University
Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hunger C, Bornhauser A, Link L, Geigges J, Voss A, Weinhold J, Schweitzer J. The Experience in Personal Social Systems Questionnaire (EXIS.pers): Development and Psychometric Properties. Fam Process. 2017 Mar;56(1):154-170. doi: 10.1111/famp.12205. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
Barth, I., Immel, N. & Hunger-Schoppe, C. (2023). Systemische Prävention. [in print, Publisher: Kohlhammer]
Satow, L. (2012). Stress and Coping Inventory (SCI). available under: http://www.drsatow.de/tests/stress-und-coping-inventar/
Schulz, P., Schlotz, W. & Becker, P. (2004). Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Grosse M, Grawe K. BERN INVENTORY OF TREATMENT GOALS: PART 1. Development and First Application of a Taxonomy of Treatment Goal Themes. Psychother Res. 2002 Mar 1;12(1):79-99. doi: 10.1080/713869618.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SysLife©
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.