Red Blood Cell Transfusion in ECMO - A Feasibility Trial

NCT ID: NCT05814094

Last Updated: 2025-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-20

Study Completion Date

2025-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is an invasive and resource intense treatment used to support critically ill patients who have suffered severe cardiac arrest, cardiac failure or respiratory failure (including severe cases of COVID-19). ECMO acts as a mechanical circulatory support temporarily replacing the function of the heart or lungs by oxygenating blood and removing carbon dioxide, allowing time for these organs to recover. Many critically ill patients, including those on ECMO, have an increased risk of bleeding and reduced production/increased destruction of red blood cells (RBCs). This can lead to anaemia (haemoglobin levels \<120 g/l), a condition where the body lacks enough healthy RBCs to carry enough oxygen to the body's tissues. Therefore, patients on ECMO frequently require RBC transfusion, with clinicians having to decide if administering an RBC transfusion (with its associated risks) is higher than tolerating complications of anaemia.

ROSETTA is a feasibility study that aims to determine the safety and feasibility of randomizing patients on ECMO to a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy (maintain Hb concentration above 70g/L) or to a more liberal transfusion strategy (maintain Hb concentration above 90g/L). Feasibility is defined as the ability to achieve a mean separation of at least 10g/L between the average lowest daily haemoglobin values in the two study groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A recent Cochrane analysis recommended a transfusion strategy that minimises the use of RBC transfusions in critically ill patients (by tolerating anaemia to avoid the adverse effects of an RBC transfusion). However, the analysis acknowledges that the degree of anaemia which can be tolerated by such patients is unknown, especially in patients suffering from conditions that limit oxygen delivery to the organs (like cardiac disease). As a result, the Australian Blood Authority's guidelines recommend an RBC transfusion to a patient at an Hb concentration of less than 70 g/L, while a transfusion at a Hb between 70 and 90 g/L should be based on the need to relieve clinical signs and symptoms of anaemia. However, this range is broad, and many studies in the general critically ill cohort have shown lower transfusion triggers are non-inferior to higher transfusion triggers.

No studies have been completed directly evaluating transfusion triggers in the ECMO patient cohort. ECMO patients differ to the general critically ill cohort as they have different physiological requirements, are at higher-risk for poor outcomes, and have an increased requirement for transfusions. Hb is a key driver of oxygen delivery (DO2), and critically ill ECMO patients are more commonly exposed to low DO2 due to low cardiac output and borderline oxygenation. Therefore, studies must be done to evaluate the optimal transfusion trigger/s (as determined by Hb concentration) that optimise mortality and long-term outcomes of ECMO patients.

Should the ROSSETTA Pilot results indicate adequate separation of at least 10g/L between the two study groups, and that patient safety has not been adversely affected by the trial methods, feasibility will be deemed confirmed and the protocol not in need of modification prior to full trial commencement. At this point the ROSETTA Pilot will be transitioned into the Red Blood Cell Transfusion Domain, within RECOMMEND Platform Trial. The Primary and Secondary outcomes of the trial at large, will be answered during this stage.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Loss Anemia Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Complication Disability Physical Cognitive Ability, General Functional Status

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Restrictive Transfusion Trigger Group

if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Red Blood Cell Transfusion

Intervention Type OTHER

Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused within 12 hours of the result becoming available. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L. A transfusion above the restrictive threshold of 70g/L is discouraged.

Liberal Transfusion Trigger Group

if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused. Additional units can be prescribed to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Red Blood Cell Transfusion

Intervention Type OTHER

Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused in order to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L within 12 hours of the result becoming available. A decision not to transfuse below the threshold of 90g/L is discouraged.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion

Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 70g/L, one unit of RBC will be transfused within 12 hours of the result becoming available. Additional units can be prescribed if required to raise the Hb concentration to above 70g/L. A transfusion above the restrictive threshold of 70g/L is discouraged.

Intervention Type OTHER

Red Blood Cell Transfusion

Following randomisation, if a patient's Hb concentration reads ≤ 90g/L, one or more units of RBC will be transfused in order to raise the Hb concentration to greater than 90g/L within 12 hours of the result becoming available. A decision not to transfuse below the threshold of 90g/L is discouraged.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients receiving ECMO
* Age: 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindication to RBC transfusion (including known patient preference)
* Limitations of care put in place either through patient wishes or the treating medical teams
* ECMO treatment for more than 12 hours. The start of ECMO is defined as the time of initiation of extracorporeal blood flow unless ECMO was initiated during a surgical intervention in which case the start is defined as the arrival time into the initial ICU.
* The treating physician anticipates that ECMO treatment will cease before the end of tomorrow
* Where the treating physician deems the study is not in the patient's best interest
* Where the treating physician has concern regarding patient ability to tolerate restrictive or liberal transfusion trigger thresholds
* Patients actively listed for a solid organ transplant
* Patients who are suspected or confirmed to be pregnant
* Previous ECMO treatment during the same hospital admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hergen Buscher, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney

Zoe McQuilten, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Carol Hodgson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Alistair Nichol, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Aidan Burrell, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Mark Dennis, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Timothy Southwood, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Alisa Higgins, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Sally Newman, Nursing

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney

Thao Le, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Monash University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

St Vincent's Health Sydney

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Curtis Hopkins, B.BioMed, MPH, MHA

Role: CONTACT

+61 3 9903 0343

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Heidi Buhr

Role: primary

+61 2 9515 6007

Hergen Buscher, A/Prof

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANZIC-RC/HB001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.