The REDEEM Pilot Study: A Feasibility RCT of Early ECMO in Severe Acute Respiratory Infection, Including COVID-19, WHO

NCT ID: NCT04708457

Last Updated: 2023-10-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who are critically ill in intensive care with moderate to severe acute respiratory infection often require mechanical ventilation. Prolonged ventilation increases the risk of lung damage and other side effects as a result of long term use of sedation medications. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy (ECMO), is a relatively new technology that uses a pump to remove blood from the body and return it back to the body after adding oxygen and removing carbon dioxide. ECMO can be used on patients who require mechanical ventilation and can function without the need for ongoing mechanical ventilation, thus reducing risk of side effects. Participants will be randomised into either the early ECMO therapy group or will continue standard treatment involving mechanical ventilation.

This pilot study aims to determine if a phase 3 Randomised Control Trial (RCT) is feasible for the use of early ECMO therapy to treat patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI). The success of the study will be determined by the successful recruitment of adult patients, that there is a difference between ECMO utilisation between groups and that there are no safety issues.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prolonged mechanical ventilation is standard care for SARI and is associated with long term functional complications: Current guidelines recommend that mechanical ventilation, including protective lung strategies such as low tidal volumes, low peak pressures and titrated peak end expiratory pressure (PEEP), should form the mainstay of treatment for severe respiratory failure. While these strategies have been shown to reduce mortality, the application of invasive mechanical ventilation in the setting of SARIs may in fact propagate ongoing lung injury. Ventilator induced lung injury (VILI) results from the high pressures, over distension, and shear injury used by the ventilator to maintain gas exchange. Invasive ventilation can lead to secondary bacterial infection from poor clearance of sputum by sedated patients. And "air hunger" - the rapid and deep injurious breathing pattern by patients with severe lung injury - can lead to patient self-induced lung injury (P-SILI). Taken together, these factors can lead to a vicious cycle - the VILI Vortex - where lung damage leads to shrinkage of the functional lung unit, reduced compliance, higher transpulmonary pressures, worsening inflammation, further shrinkage, and ultimately even more severe lung damage and gas exchange failure.

Current strategies to facilitate mechanical ventilation include prolonged heavy sedation to assist patient-ventilator synchronization, and neuromuscular blockade (to prevent any spontaneous respiratory effort), often for weeks at a time. These interventions, plus the underlying lung damage, contribute to significant long term complications, including immobility and ICU myopathy, delirium, respiratory muscle weakness and tracheostomy, leading to significant delays in ICU and hospital discharge, rehabilitation, and return to home. Survivors of prolonged mechanical ventilation have been shown to have high rates of functional disability, immobility, psychological injury, and reduced health related quality of life - and these outcomes can persist for up to 5 years.

Thus, conventional treatment with mechanical ventilation, deep sedation, and/or neuromuscular paralysis is likely to adversely impact long term functional outcomes in patients with SARI. There is a clear unmet need for novel strategies that facilitate safe lung ventilation, while also limiting the intensity and duration of these interventions and complications.

ECMO is an external machine that oxygenates the blood in addition to a mechanical ventilator. Venous cannulae drain blood out of the body and return it back after an oxygenator adds oxygen and removes carbon dioxide. Venovenous (VV) ECMO supports patients with respiratory failure, by providing the body with sufficient oxygen and by removing all the carbon dioxide (CO2) in the blood (causing a respiratory alkalosis), which reduces the drive to breathe and permits "lung rest". Resting the lungs avoids VILI, reduces pulmonary and systemic inflammation, and reduces extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction. Traditionally, ECMO was employed very late in the course of the disease as a "rescue therapy", when patients already had severely damaged lungs, due to fears of complications such as bleeding that would worsen the patients multi organ failure. However advances in modern ECMO technology mean it is associated with a lower complication rate (\<10% cannula site bleeding) and its use has doubled over the last five years. ECMO now offers the ideal platform to prevent ventilator-induced lung damage in patients that are less severely unwell, and earlier in the disease process, while also reducing the need for heavy sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade. It facilitates safe de-sedation without VILI as well as extubation, and physiotherapy-which is difficult to carry out adequately when a patient is sedated and ventilated. All these factors have been associated with improved long term health outcomes for patients.

This study aims to determine if a large RCT looking at use of early ECMO to treat patients with SARI is feasible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mechanical Ventilation Complication Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Covid19

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early ECMO

Early ECMO therapy for patients who have SARI and have been mechanically ventilated for 5-7 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

VV-ECMO

Intervention Type OTHER

Early use of VV-ECMO in SARI patients.

Standard Care

Patients with SARI who are already mechanically ventilated will continue to receive the standard intensive care therapies, including ECMO if required.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

VV-ECMO

Early use of VV-ECMO in SARI patients.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Laboratory confirmed severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) pneumonitis such as Coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) or influenza, AND
2. ≥5 days of mechanical ventilation, AND
3. Moderate to severe respiratory failure as shown by either the ratio of partial pressure of oxygen and the fracture of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO2 Rati)o \<150 for \>6 hours OR the potential of hydrogen (pH) \<7.30 with carbon dioxide (CO2) \>50mmHg for 6 hours, AND
4. Are unable to pass a spontaneous breathing trial.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥70 year old
2. Extubation likely in next 24-48 hours
3. Duration of mechanical ventilation ≥7days
4. ≥2 non-pulmonary organ failures (as scored by the sequential oxygen failure assessment (SOFA) score)
5. Need for immediate VV ECMO (as per EOLIA (research study) criteria\*)
6. Requirement for VA ECMO
7. Clinical frailty or ≥2 major comorbidities
8. The physician deems the study is not in the patient's interest

* EOLIA criteria (P:F \<50 for 3 hours, P:F\<80 for 6 hours, pH\<7.25 with carbon dioxide partial pressure (PCO2) \>60 for \>6 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Alfred

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aidan Burrell, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Alfred

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Alfred Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Charite Universitatmedizin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANZIC-RC/AB V3.1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.