Efficacy of Internet-delivered Strengths Use Intervention
NCT ID: NCT05779501
Last Updated: 2023-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
167 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-15
2023-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Online Multi-component Psychological Intervention for Depression, Anxiety and Well-being in 7 Countries
NCT05443139
Brief Interventions for Coping with Distress
NCT05779761
The Effectiveness of Engagement-based Personalization of a Digital Mental Health Intervention
NCT05300906
Digital Rewards and Retention in a M-health App
NCT06883773
Efficacy of Best Possible Self Intervention Over Time
NCT02321605
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
The experimental arm will receive the online strengths use intervention program over a period of 4 weeks, through an LMS software solution.
Internet-delivered strengths use intervention
The online strengths use intervention program follows the theorized five stages of strengths use interventions: (1) preparation and commitment, (2) identification, (3) integration, (4) action, and (5) evaluation. To increase participant engagement and motivation, gamification components are embedded in several stages.
The intervention was previously tested through a feasibility and acceptability trial (NCT05474807).
The entire intervention will be delivered online via an LMS software solution.
Waiting-list control group
The waiting-list control arm will receive the same intervention immediately after the intervention group finishes and will have filled in the post-test outcomes measures.
Waiting-list
The waiting-list arm will serve as the control group, filling in only the outcome measure at the same time as the intervention group participants.
After the intervention group finishes participating in the intervention, the waiting-list participants will benefit from the same internet-delivered strengths use program.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Internet-delivered strengths use intervention
The online strengths use intervention program follows the theorized five stages of strengths use interventions: (1) preparation and commitment, (2) identification, (3) integration, (4) action, and (5) evaluation. To increase participant engagement and motivation, gamification components are embedded in several stages.
The intervention was previously tested through a feasibility and acceptability trial (NCT05474807).
The entire intervention will be delivered online via an LMS software solution.
Waiting-list
The waiting-list arm will serve as the control group, filling in only the outcome measure at the same time as the intervention group participants.
After the intervention group finishes participating in the intervention, the waiting-list participants will benefit from the same internet-delivered strengths use program.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Controlled variables:
* Participants levels of work engagement and work experience will be controlled for by stratified randomization. For each of the two factors we will created three strata (low level: lowest - 33rd percentile; moderate level: 34th - 66th percentile; high level: 67th percentile - highest), and the randomization will be applied for each stratum.
18 Years
39 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
West University of Timisoara
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
West University of Timisoara
Timișoara, Timiș County, Romania
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Camman, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire(University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan).
Luthans, F. L., Avolio, B. J., & Avey, J. A. (2007). Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PsyCap) [Database record]. APAPsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06483-000
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: Across-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli WB, Desart S, De Witte H. Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)-Development, Validity, and Reliability. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249495.
Tulbure BT, Rusu A, Sava FA, Salagean N, Farchione TJ. A Web-Based Transdiagnostic Intervention for Affective and Mood Disorders: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2018 May 24;5(2):e36. doi: 10.2196/mental.8901.
Van Woerkom, M., Mostert, K., Els, C., Bakker, A. B., De Beer, L., & Rothmann Jr, S. (2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960-975. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1193010
Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol Bull. 1984 Nov;96(3):465-90. No abstract available.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Miglianico, M., Dubreuil, P., Miquelon, P., Bakker, A. B., & Martin-Krumm, C. (2020). Strength use in the workplace: aliterature review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 737-764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00095-w
De Witte, H. (1992). Tussen optimisten en teruggetrokkenen. Een empirisch onderzoek naar het psychosociaal profiel vanlangdurig werklozen en deelnemers aan de Weer-Werkactie in Vlaanderen [Between optimists and withdrawns. An empiricalinvestigation of the psychosocial profile of longterm unemployed and participants of the Back-to-Work Program in Flanders].Leuven, Belgium: HIVA
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MEGSIS S3 RCT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.