Global Controlled Trial on Effects of an Online Self-Help Program for of Ambitious Altruists on Their Mental Health, Wellbeing, and Productivity: Comparing Versions With IFS vs. CBT, Buddy- vs. Group-, Standard- vs. Minimum-Guidance Intensity.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-10

Study Completion Date

2024-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare different versions of a 16-week online self-help program in terms of their effect on self-assessed mental health, well-being, and productivity. The versions differ in their intensity (standard, low) and type (buddy, group) of guidance, the applied psychotherapeutic approaches taught (IFS, CBT). We expect to recruit a sample of \~150 ambitious altruists and have them self-select into the four program versions. Participants take part in surveys before, at weeks 8, 12, and 16 to self-assess their productivity, mental health burden, quality of life, and other risk and protection factors. Weekly screenings will provide data on objective and subjective success components such as participant engagement, working alliance, and treatment adherence, which will be correlated with primary and secondary outcomes.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Evaluation of Chatbot for Mental Well-being

NCT05694507

Mental Well-being Mental Health Literacy

COMPLETED NA

Testing the Effectiveness of AI Chatbots to Improve Public Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Depression

NCT06858371

Depression Literacy Depression Disorders Stigma of Mental Illness

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of Online Mental Well-being Intervention for Working Adults

NCT05395312

Mental Well-being Mental Health Issue Mental Health Wellness 1

COMPLETED NA

The Effectiveness of Engagement-based Personalization of a Digital Mental Health Intervention

NCT05300906

Well-being

COMPLETED NA

Randomized Controlled Trial on Precision Mental Health

NCT05825040

Mental Well-being Mental Health Issue Mental Health Wellness 1 +1 more

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim:

This study aims to compare different versions of an online self-help program in terms of their effect on self-assessed mental health, well-being, and productivity. The goal is to find out if a version might be more effective or similarly effective but less costly than the original one.

Control groups:

The original program version is an 8-week course with weekly guided group sessions of 2 hours: Third Wave CBT methods are taught by a workbook and practised in between the sessions. The pre-post results, on 42 ambitious altruists, showed significant moderate effects on all scales after week 12. In this study, we aim to compare the effects of the original version with 1. one using a buddy instead of the group format, 2. one using less guidance (3 instead of 9 group sessions), and 3. one using Internal Family Systems instead of Third Wave CBT. Instead of 8 weeks, we spaced out the same amount of sessions for the program after week 6, so that the last follow-up session will take place for everyone at week 16 now.

Sample:

We expect to deliver the program to \~150 participants, and each version to at least 25 of those. Ambitious altruists will be recruited via posts on Facebook and Slack online groups and personal contact to organizations associated with Effective Altruism. People will self-select into the different program versions. We exclude those in acute crisis, those with very low self-assessed social competence, and those who report not being ambitiously altruistic. We match groups and buddies based on availability and on, who we believe will bond better, i.e., similar age and career stage.

Measurements. Participants take part in Google form surveys before, at weeks 8, 12, and 16. These measure productivity (WPAI:GH), mental health burden (symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity, and OCD by BSI, depressiveness and anxiety by GAD7 \& PHQ8), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF, MHC-SF, ONS-4 LS), and other relevant factors (loneliness by UCLA-3, self-esteem by Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, connection/will to do good by IWAH). An independent researcher, likely from Maastricht University, will likely check our data, calculate the results, and publish a paper about it to reduce potential biases. Also, participants' engagement will be assessed, i.e., no-shows, and dropouts, and participants attend a weekly screening in weeks 1-8, 12, and 16 to rate different success components, e.g. session engagement, working alliance, and treatment adherence. Those measures will be correlated with the primary and secondary outcomes at one point to see what influences outcomes and how strongly.

We applied to get an official letter of exemption from an ethics review due to these reasons:

* The study is only part of the already existing programs, nothing is changed in the operations affecting the participants due to the evaluation/study run
* Measurements are part of routine progress tracking
* The data is being used for publication purposes but does not introduce new risks
* The interventions as well as the data collection are 100% non-invasive and include a signed participant consent.
* The sampling excludes potentially vulnerable individuals, i.e., those in a current crisis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Treatment Adherence and Compliance Anxiety Depression Mental Health Issue Quality of Life Well-Being, Psychological Social Functioning Cognitive Dysfunction Interpersonal Relations Self Esteem Loneliness Functioning, Psychosocial Functioning, Social

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CBT Group Standard Guidance

* 9 group sessions, at week 0-6, 8, 12, 18
* groups of 4-6 peers and a trained facilitator
* participants work through the tailored Third Wave CBT workbook by Rethink Wellbeing, one chapter each week
* in between sessions, people practice the new skills learned in the workbook and are supported in an online community, guided by a trained psychologist and psychotherapist

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR