Comparison of Weight Bearing Thrust Manipulation With Non Weightbearing Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Forward Head Posture

NCT ID: NCT05762289

Last Updated: 2023-03-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-01

Study Completion Date

2023-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial was performed in MMRC (Majestic medicine rehabilitation Sciences) Islamabad in February 2023 and consisted of patients having neck pain and forward head posture. 30 Patients were divided into two groups of 15 each by sealed envelope method . Treatment group was given weight bearing thrust manipulation in sitting and control was given non weight bearing thrust manipulation in supine lying. Pain was calculated through NPRS and Cervical ranges were calculated by Inclinometer before and immediately after treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cervical Spine is most integral part of human spine as it sits between highly stable thoracic and highly movable occipital bodies. It help the head movement of flexion , rotation which are constantly required for performing basic activities of daily life. It is a link between head and rest of the body and due to its need in mobility it is often put under greater stress , muscular imbalance, reduced disc spaces and common site for many spinous syndromes. One of the most common disability that occurs on cervical spine is forward headv posture usually associated with upper crossed syndrome and is known as text neck also due to strain put on spine due to high usage of screen devices. Sedentary lifestyle and postural imbalances and effect of gravity are usually the major causes of muscular and bony imbalances that result in forward head posture. Prolonged state of stress on muscles usually result in pain in neck specially during movement.

High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust (HVLAT) is a common technique to unlock cervical joints and muscular pain associated with it and immediately reduce pain. Cavitation sound or pop is often associated with this thrust technique that is result decrease in pressure causes dissolved gasses in the synovial fluid to be released into the joint cavity of due to which , the force-displacement curve shifts and the range of motion of the joint increases.It has been stated that spinal manipulation activates presynaptic inhibition of segmental pain pathways, reflex muscle relaxation, and reflex pain Inhibition. It has been repeatedly proved by literature that thrust manupulation is an effective was of increasing ROM and pain in patients in non weight bearing positions but it can also be given in weight bearing position effects of which are yet not very clear specially in patient population such as forward head posture .The current study was planned to compare the effectiveness of thrust manipulation in weight bearing and non weight bearing postions on pain and range in forward head posture . The hypothesis was that there will be significant difference in the effect of thrust manipulation in different positions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Patients were randomized using sealed envelope method where all the participants selected their envelopes which were opaque and placed in a container . All the patients who were willing after informing all the risk and procedures were then selected in two groups Group A (treatment group) or weight bearing group and Group B (Control group)non weight bearing group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Change in range of motion and within the weight bearing group

. Subjects in Group A or treatment group were seated and given thrust manipulation using belt. Cervical spine was placed in neutral position and belt was stabilized on C4-C5 which is the part that causes most stiffness and pain and lost of range. Patient placed belt in left hand for left sided thrust and caudal force was applied , therapist held other end of the belt and applied stretch in the line of eye ball. The cervical spine of patient was guided in left rotation until resistance was felt and than thrust of high velocity low amplitude was given by therapist . This was done for both sides if the cavitation sound was not heard manipulation was tried for a second time after 10 minutes by repositioning the patient but no more than two times in a day. Therapist performing manipulation was skilled in giving belt thrust manipulation.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.

Control

While Group B received manipulation in supine position by maitland's traditional thrust. Where the neck is slightly flexed by therapist hand on the occipit where therapist is standing behind the head. Neck is guided in right side flexion and opposite rotation and at the end of rang high velocity low amplitude thrust is applied. This was done for both sides if the cavitation sound was not heard manipulation was tried for a second time after 10 minutes by repositioning the patient but no more than two times in a day

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)

Intervention Type OTHER

Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)

Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Forward head posture
* Patients who had complain of neck pain
* Decrease range of flexion, extension, rotation and side flexion of cervical spine
* Craniovertebral angle below 48 were included

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with structural or anatomical deformity,
* recent surgical history , degenerative changes ,
* cervical instability,
* malignancy
* radiculopathy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Yusra Medical and Dental College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maham Nasir

Head Of Physical Therapy Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maham Nasir, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yusra institute of Rehabilitation sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MMRC

Islamabad, , Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YusraMDC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.