Comparison of Weight Bearing Thrust Manipulation With Non Weightbearing Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Forward Head Posture
NCT ID: NCT05762289
Last Updated: 2023-03-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-01
2023-02-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Thoracic Thrust With Cervical Non-Thrust Mobilization in Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT07326696
Thrust Manipulation vs. Non-thrust Mobilizations for Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT02619500
Effects of Thrust Versus Non-Thrust Thoracic Manipulation on Mechanical Neck Pain.
NCT05542875
Comparing the Effects of Neck Stabilization Exercises Verses Dynamic Exercises Among Patients Having Nonspecific Neck Pain With Forward Head Posture
NCT05298631
Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on Craniovertebral Angle and Proprioception in Forward Head Posture
NCT06699888
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
High Velocity Low Amplitude Thrust (HVLAT) is a common technique to unlock cervical joints and muscular pain associated with it and immediately reduce pain. Cavitation sound or pop is often associated with this thrust technique that is result decrease in pressure causes dissolved gasses in the synovial fluid to be released into the joint cavity of due to which , the force-displacement curve shifts and the range of motion of the joint increases.It has been stated that spinal manipulation activates presynaptic inhibition of segmental pain pathways, reflex muscle relaxation, and reflex pain Inhibition. It has been repeatedly proved by literature that thrust manupulation is an effective was of increasing ROM and pain in patients in non weight bearing positions but it can also be given in weight bearing position effects of which are yet not very clear specially in patient population such as forward head posture .The current study was planned to compare the effectiveness of thrust manipulation in weight bearing and non weight bearing postions on pain and range in forward head posture . The hypothesis was that there will be significant difference in the effect of thrust manipulation in different positions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Change in range of motion and within the weight bearing group
. Subjects in Group A or treatment group were seated and given thrust manipulation using belt. Cervical spine was placed in neutral position and belt was stabilized on C4-C5 which is the part that causes most stiffness and pain and lost of range. Patient placed belt in left hand for left sided thrust and caudal force was applied , therapist held other end of the belt and applied stretch in the line of eye ball. The cervical spine of patient was guided in left rotation until resistance was felt and than thrust of high velocity low amplitude was given by therapist . This was done for both sides if the cavitation sound was not heard manipulation was tried for a second time after 10 minutes by repositioning the patient but no more than two times in a day. Therapist performing manipulation was skilled in giving belt thrust manipulation.
Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)
Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.
Control
While Group B received manipulation in supine position by maitland's traditional thrust. Where the neck is slightly flexed by therapist hand on the occipit where therapist is standing behind the head. Neck is guided in right side flexion and opposite rotation and at the end of rang high velocity low amplitude thrust is applied. This was done for both sides if the cavitation sound was not heard manipulation was tried for a second time after 10 minutes by repositioning the patient but no more than two times in a day
Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)
Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thrust Manipulation (in weight bearing and non weight bearing)
Pain and Range of cervical motion was assessed before and after manipulation in both groups.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who had complain of neck pain
* Decrease range of flexion, extension, rotation and side flexion of cervical spine
* Craniovertebral angle below 48 were included
Exclusion Criteria
* recent surgical history , degenerative changes ,
* cervical instability,
* malignancy
* radiculopathy
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yusra Medical and Dental College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maham Nasir
Head Of Physical Therapy Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maham Nasir, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yusra institute of Rehabilitation sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MMRC
Islamabad, , Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
YusraMDC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.