Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-22
2021-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Cranio-cervical Flexion on Cervical Proprioception
NCT05074615
Role of Nerve Mobilizations in Decreasing Pain and Disability Among Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy
NCT04896749
Thoracic Thrust With Cervical Non-Thrust Mobilization in Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT07326696
Effect of Proprioceptive Training Using Head Mounted Laser in Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain
NCT06034223
Physiotherapy Techniques in Adult Neck Pain
NCT05308199
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Neck pain can be categorized in many ways i.e. Duration(Acute, Sub acute, Chronic), Intensity, Severity, Type(Mechanical, Neuropathic etc.). Among them duration proves to be the best predictor of outcome. Short duration pain have better prognosis than long standing pain. Mechanical Neck Pain is defined as widespread cervical and/or shoulder pain possessing mechanical properties, such as symptoms aggravated by prolonged or abnormal neck posture, neck mobility and/or by palpation of the neck musculature Mechanical pain originates from the spine or by its supporting structures, such as muscles and ligaments. Pain arising from the facet joints eg, arthritis, diskogenic pain, and myofascial pain can be named as Mechanical pain. It is proposed to be associated with several anatomic structures, predominantly facet joints and uncovertebral(Luschka's joints). The risk factors for mechanical neck pain include abnormal posture, stress, substantial lifting and anxiety. Around 15% females and 10% males suffer from Chronic mechanical neck pain at any one time in life. Clinicians find it challenging to prevent a patient from entering into the chronic phase of their condition.
The most mobile part of the vertebral column is the upper cervical spine. And it is at the expense of its mechanical stability. Neuromuscular control to the mobile cervical spine is provided by the highly developed proprioceptive system. Neck pain can lead to disturbed afferent input from the cervical region that may be a possible cause of symptoms such as dizziness, unsteadiness, and visual disturbances. Signs of altered postural stability, cervical proprioception, and head and eye movement control are also said to be the cause of disturbed afferent input.
By an abundance of mechanoreceptors, the proprioceptive system of the cervical spine is very well developed especially from the muscle spindles in the deep segmental upper cervical muscles. Muscle spindle afferent are more important because they are the first ones to operate in proprioception. As compared to the lower cervical spine, the upper cervical spine has an abundance of muscle spindle receptors and greater contributions to reflex activity and connections to the visual and vestibular systems. It concludes that patients with the cause of upper cervical complaints in neck pain have a greater chance for balance and visual disturbances than those with complaints of lower cervical spine.
The ability to maintain body orientation and posture in relation to the surrounding environment is a key process required for normal functions such as coordinated movements. Sensorimotor control of stable upright posture and head and eye movement depends on afferent information from the vestibular, visual and proprioceptive systems, which all together merge in several areas of the Central Nervous System. Proprioception is important for well-adapted sensorimotor control. Proprioception fulfills roles in feedback sensorimotor control and regulation of muscle stiffness, being specifically important for movement acuity, joint stability, coordination, and balance. For head-eye co-ordination and movement control, cervical proprioception is uniquely important. Musculoskeletal disorders due to pain, effusion, trauma, and fatigue alter the normal proprioceptive mechanism.
Neck pain patients are said to have a poor awareness of their head and neck posture, and a few patients are reported to complain about "whopping head" which might be the cause of altered cervical position sense. The rehabilitation procedures in the field of musculoskeletal diseases aim to improve muscular force, joint mobility, and proprioceptive sensibility. Currently, only strength and mobility are evaluated in cervical spine rehabilitation programs, although a wealth of cephalic and neck receptors suggests a major emphasis on proprioceptive information in postural and dynamic functions of the head-neck system.
A study by J Arami and colleagues (2014) on the "Applicability of proprioceptive and endurance measurement protocols to treat patient with chronic non-specific neck pain" was conducted. Chronic neck pain patients were divided into two groups, one of them received endurance training and the other group received proprioceptive training. This study suggested that endurance exercise was a more efficient method for improving endurance and Proprioceptive training was better in resolving joint position error and Pain. Both protocol appeared to be useful in treating patients with chronic non specific neck pain.
Cervicogenic headache is getting common in young adults along with proprioception deficit in the cervical region. In this study, 30 participants of Cervicogenic headache were included. The control group received stretching exercises. The experimental group in addition to stretching received cervical stabilization exercises. Headache disability index and neck proprioception were evaluated before and after the treatment programs. At the end of 4rth week, Headache disability index scores and neck pain and proprioception error improved more in the experimental group. Hence the study concluded that Cervical stabilization exercises along with stretching are more effective in improving neck proprioception and Headache disability index than stretching alone.
The presence of strong coupling between gaze orientation and muscle neck activity has been well documented in humans. This co-ordination between neck motor functions and eye strongly suggest that eye head coupling based rehabilitation program are more appropriate to improve neck proprioception and this afterwards aid in reducing pain. A comparison was done between two groups of neck pain patients one of them receiving the traditional physiotherapy protocol for chronic neck pain and the experimental group received an eye head coupling based rehabilitation program modified from Revel et al., in addition to the traditional protocol given to the other group. The results showed a significant reduction in scores of Neck Pain and Disability scale in both groups with a greater decrease in the experimental subjects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control Group
It Includes the TENS, Infrared, Isometric and stretching exercises along with the home plan and postural education
conventional physiotherapy
1. TENS for 15 minutes on Constant Mode according to patient comfort.
2. Infrared for 15 minutes.
3. Isometric exercises: Isometric neck flexion, extension, side bending exercises were given. 3 sets of 10 repetitions each were given. And resistance was given for 6-8 seconds for each movement.
4. Stretching exercises: Passive stretching for Sternocleidomastoid, short sub occipital muscles, Trapezius \& Scalene, Pectoralis Major was given. 3 sets of 10 reps were given and each stretch was maintained for 10 seconds.
5. Home Plan: self stretches and isometrics.
6. Postural Education: posture correction in daily life activities in sitting, walking, lying.
Experimental Group
It Includes the TENS, Infrared, Isometric and stretching exercises along with the home plan and postural education. It also include the cervical proprioceptive training
Cervical proprioceptive training
1. TENS for 15 minutes on Constant Mode according to patient comfort.
2. Infrared for 15 minutes.
3. Isometric exercises: Isometric neck flexion, extension, side bending exercises were given. 3 sets of 10 repetitions each were given. And resistance was given for 6-8 seconds for each movement.
4. Stretching exercises: Passive stretching for Sternocleidomastoid, short sub occipital muscles, Trapezius \& Scalene, Pectoralis Major was given. 3 sets of 10 reps were given and each stretch was maintained for 10 seconds.
5. Home Plan: self stretches and isometrics.
6. Postural Education: posture correction in daily life activities in sitting, walking, lying.
7. The patients wearing a cap with a laser pointer attached to it were seated three feet away from the target A, B and C. Start Chart A with a 3 cm, chart B 2cm and chart C 1cm narrow pathway were presented to the patients. The time taken by the patient to complete the pathway without any error was noted.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
conventional physiotherapy
1. TENS for 15 minutes on Constant Mode according to patient comfort.
2. Infrared for 15 minutes.
3. Isometric exercises: Isometric neck flexion, extension, side bending exercises were given. 3 sets of 10 repetitions each were given. And resistance was given for 6-8 seconds for each movement.
4. Stretching exercises: Passive stretching for Sternocleidomastoid, short sub occipital muscles, Trapezius \& Scalene, Pectoralis Major was given. 3 sets of 10 reps were given and each stretch was maintained for 10 seconds.
5. Home Plan: self stretches and isometrics.
6. Postural Education: posture correction in daily life activities in sitting, walking, lying.
Cervical proprioceptive training
1. TENS for 15 minutes on Constant Mode according to patient comfort.
2. Infrared for 15 minutes.
3. Isometric exercises: Isometric neck flexion, extension, side bending exercises were given. 3 sets of 10 repetitions each were given. And resistance was given for 6-8 seconds for each movement.
4. Stretching exercises: Passive stretching for Sternocleidomastoid, short sub occipital muscles, Trapezius \& Scalene, Pectoralis Major was given. 3 sets of 10 reps were given and each stretch was maintained for 10 seconds.
5. Home Plan: self stretches and isometrics.
6. Postural Education: posture correction in daily life activities in sitting, walking, lying.
7. The patients wearing a cap with a laser pointer attached to it were seated three feet away from the target A, B and C. Start Chart A with a 3 cm, chart B 2cm and chart C 1cm narrow pathway were presented to the patients. The time taken by the patient to complete the pathway without any error was noted.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Limitation of cervical ROM
3. Age 18-55
4. Men and Women
Exclusion Criteria
2. Vertebral artery insufficiency test positive Neck pain due to:
3. Inflammatory conditions - infections, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica.
4. Metabolic - osteoporosis, osteomalacia, Paget's disease, gout.
5. Neoplastic - metastases, myeloma, intrathecal tumours.
6. Referred pain as a result of - angina pectoris, aortic aneurysm, pancoast tumour, diaphragmatic pathology, pharyngial pathology
7. Neck injury due to trauma
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mir Arif Hussain
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mir Arif Hussain
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Iqra Raja, MS-OMPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad.
Islamabad, Capital, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vernon H, Humphreys K, Hagino C. Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;30(3):215-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.01.014.
Falla D. Unravelling the complexity of muscle impairment in chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2004 Aug;9(3):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.05.003.
May S, Gardiner E, Young S, Klaber-Moffett J. Predictor Variables for a Positive Long-Term Functional Outcome in Patients with Acute and Chronic Neck and Back Pain Treated with a McKenzie Approach: A Secondary Analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(3):155-60. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2008.16.3.155.
Royuela A, Kovacs FM, Campillo C, Casamitjana M, Muriel A, Abraira V. Predicting outcomes of neuroreflexotherapy in patients with subacute or chronic neck or low back pain. Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1588-600. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.039. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Peterson C, Bolton J, Humphreys BK. Predictors of outcome in neck pain patients undergoing chiropractic care: comparison of acute and chronic patients. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Aug 24;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-27.
Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Palomeque-del-Cerro L, Rodriguez-Blanco C, Gomez-Conesa A, Miangolarra-Page JC. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.007.
Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R. The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Feb;90(2):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.017.
Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):364-77. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2834.
Kristjansson E, Leivseth G, Brinckmann P, Frobin W. Increased sagittal plane segmental motion in the lower cervical spine in women with chronic whiplash-associated disorders, grades I-II: a case-control study using a new measurement protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2215-21. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000089525.59684.49.
Rolli Salathe C, Elfering A. A Health- and Resource-Oriented Perspective on NSLBP. ISRN Pain. 2013 Sep 11;2013:640690. doi: 10.1155/2013/640690. eCollection 2013.
Hush JM, Michaleff Z, Maher CG, Refshauge K. Individual, physical and psychological risk factors for neck pain in Australian office workers: a 1-year longitudinal study. Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1532-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1011-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
Descarreaux M, Mayrand N, Raymond J. Neuromuscular control of the head in an isometric force reproduction task: comparison of whiplash subjects and healthy controls. Spine J. 2007 Nov-Dec;7(6):647-53. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
Clark NC, Roijezon U, Treleaven J. Proprioception in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Part 2: Clinical assessment and intervention. Man Ther. 2015 Jun;20(3):378-87. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
Newcomer KL, Laskowski ER, Yu B, Johnson JC, An KN. Differences in repositioning error among patients with low back pain compared with control subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 1;25(19):2488-93. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00011.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Iqra Raja 00176
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.