Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on Craniovertebral Angle and Proprioception in Forward Head Posture
NCT ID: NCT06699888
Last Updated: 2025-04-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2025-04-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conventional Neck Exercise With and Without Scapular Corrective Exercises in Patients With Forward Head Posture
NCT05338814
Postural Correction Exercises Effect on Forward Head Posture
NCT05905094
Effects of Cervical Spine Retraction Exercise With and Without Diaphragmatic Breathing in Forward Head Posture.
NCT06130969
McKenzie Retraction and Bruegger's Exercises Effects on Forward Head Posture
NCT06086834
Effects of Cervical Spine Manipulation
NCT05582733
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Literature suggest that manipulation has beneficial effects in improving the pain and postural control in spine. The cervicothoracic (CT) junction is the transitional segment between the mobile lordotic cervical and less mobile kyphotic thoracic spines and hence a potential region for stiffness. The cervicothoracic junction, a potential stiffness region, can cause neck, headache, and upper limb pain. Improving its range of motion could reduce the need for compensatory movement, reducing cervical spine tension. According to recent systematic review, cervicothoracic junction level manual therapy in subjects with FHP better improved the muscle recruitment ability than upper-cervical level manual therapy during motor tasks. Upper thoracic spine manipulation has been shown to be more beneficial than thoracic mobilization, cervical mobilization, and standard care for FHP during performing motor task. In 2023 study conducted by Ibrahim et al. find out that FHP influenced Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Processing in asymptomatic young adults and they reported 1-degree increase in the CVA measurement (indicating better posture) significantly decreased the amplitudes of all the potentials and resulted in a faster, more efficient nerve conduction time
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cervicothoracic Manipulation group
the subject will receive cervicothoracic manipulation and Chin tuck, Strengthening Shoulder Retractors, Stretching SCM, Pectoralis Stretch
cervicothoracic manipulation group
The participant lay prone with the head firmly into the head piece Palpation of the upper cervico-thoracic segment observed the side of the restriction.
The participants head was rotated to the contralateral side of the restriction. The practitioner's hand contacted the forehead and the other hand's thumb contacted the spinous process of the restricted side.
A low amplitude, high velocity thrust towards the axilla was applied, on the spinous process in PA direction.
Experimental group also received following exercises Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks
forward head correction exercises group
this group receive Chin tuck, Strengthening Shoulder Retractors, Stretching SCM, Pectoralis Stretch
forward head correction exercises traditional group
Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cervicothoracic manipulation group
The participant lay prone with the head firmly into the head piece Palpation of the upper cervico-thoracic segment observed the side of the restriction.
The participants head was rotated to the contralateral side of the restriction. The practitioner's hand contacted the forehead and the other hand's thumb contacted the spinous process of the restricted side.
A low amplitude, high velocity thrust towards the axilla was applied, on the spinous process in PA direction.
Experimental group also received following exercises Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks
forward head correction exercises traditional group
Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants with asymptomatic Forward head posture
* Participants having no active complain of neck pain and muscle stiffness
* Joint position error, an average of \>4.5◦ error in rotation or extension directions
* For FHP patient, the Craniovertebral angle should be ≤ 53º
Exclusion Criteria
* Vestibular pathologies i.e. vertigo, dizziness
* Musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that could affect Proprioception, cognitive impairment
* History of spinal and thoracic surgeries
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aisha Razzaq, PHD*
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Barki Rehabilitation Center
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Riphah IU Samiyah Asghar
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.