Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on Craniovertebral Angle and Proprioception in Forward Head Posture

NCT ID: NCT06699888

Last Updated: 2025-04-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2025-04-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this research is to find out the effect of Cervicothoracic Junction Manipulation on neck Proprioception in individuals with Forward Head Posture. A Randomized controlled trials done at Barki Advance Physiotherapy Center. The sample size was 36. The subjects were divided in two groups, 18 subjects in control group and 16 in experimental (Cervicothoracic Manipulation) group. Study duration is of 6 months after the ethical approval. Sampling technique applied was non probability connivance sampling technique. Only 18-45 years individuals with forward head posture, craniovertebral angle less than 53° degrees and Joint position error, an average of \>4.5◦ error in rotation or extension direction were included. Tools used in the study are Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) and Joint Position Error Test (JPE).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

FHP is greatly linked with multiple musculoskeletal conditions like head and neck dysfunction, myofascial trigger points, temporomandibular dysfunction, poor cervical mobility and functional disability of the cervical and thoracic spines. It also observed in asymptomatic individuals. Muscle spindles, especially in cervical detect muscle length changes and contribute to proprioception. Changes in neck muscles can disrupt proprioceptive function in the cervical spine. Proprioception is vital for joint function, providing stability during activities and informing posture and movement. Decreased balance and positioning errors are common in individuals with neck discomfort, emphasizing the importance of restoring proprioceptive function, particularly in Forward Head Posture (FHP) patients, for maintaining normal neck posture. Abnormalities in the head posture are absolutely harmful for the Head and neck posture. A study investigated the CV angle and joint position error in the cervical region and found a negative correlation between head posture and proprioceptive function, indicating that chronic abnormal head posture (FHP) negatively affects proprioception, body stability, and neck pain. Spinal manipulation uses high velocity and low amplitude thrusts to realign restricted vertebrae, removing restriction in facet joints, and producing mechanical, physiological, and biological effects.

Literature suggest that manipulation has beneficial effects in improving the pain and postural control in spine. The cervicothoracic (CT) junction is the transitional segment between the mobile lordotic cervical and less mobile kyphotic thoracic spines and hence a potential region for stiffness. The cervicothoracic junction, a potential stiffness region, can cause neck, headache, and upper limb pain. Improving its range of motion could reduce the need for compensatory movement, reducing cervical spine tension. According to recent systematic review, cervicothoracic junction level manual therapy in subjects with FHP better improved the muscle recruitment ability than upper-cervical level manual therapy during motor tasks. Upper thoracic spine manipulation has been shown to be more beneficial than thoracic mobilization, cervical mobilization, and standard care for FHP during performing motor task. In 2023 study conducted by Ibrahim et al. find out that FHP influenced Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Processing in asymptomatic young adults and they reported 1-degree increase in the CVA measurement (indicating better posture) significantly decreased the amplitudes of all the potentials and resulted in a faster, more efficient nerve conduction time

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Forward Head Posture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cervicothoracic Manipulation group

the subject will receive cervicothoracic manipulation and Chin tuck, Strengthening Shoulder Retractors, Stretching SCM, Pectoralis Stretch

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cervicothoracic manipulation group

Intervention Type OTHER

The participant lay prone with the head firmly into the head piece Palpation of the upper cervico-thoracic segment observed the side of the restriction.

The participants head was rotated to the contralateral side of the restriction. The practitioner's hand contacted the forehead and the other hand's thumb contacted the spinous process of the restricted side.

A low amplitude, high velocity thrust towards the axilla was applied, on the spinous process in PA direction.

Experimental group also received following exercises Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks

forward head correction exercises group

this group receive Chin tuck, Strengthening Shoulder Retractors, Stretching SCM, Pectoralis Stretch

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

forward head correction exercises traditional group

Intervention Type OTHER

Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cervicothoracic manipulation group

The participant lay prone with the head firmly into the head piece Palpation of the upper cervico-thoracic segment observed the side of the restriction.

The participants head was rotated to the contralateral side of the restriction. The practitioner's hand contacted the forehead and the other hand's thumb contacted the spinous process of the restricted side.

A low amplitude, high velocity thrust towards the axilla was applied, on the spinous process in PA direction.

Experimental group also received following exercises Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks

Intervention Type OTHER

forward head correction exercises traditional group

Chin tuck Strengthening Shoulder Retractors. Stretching SCM Pectoralis Stretch 3 × 10 repetitions, 3 times a week for 2 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Both male and female patients with age between 18-45 years
* Participants with asymptomatic Forward head posture
* Participants having no active complain of neck pain and muscle stiffness
* Joint position error, an average of \>4.5◦ error in rotation or extension directions
* For FHP patient, the Craniovertebral angle should be ≤ 53º

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous history of neck and head trauma
* Vestibular pathologies i.e. vertigo, dizziness
* Musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that could affect Proprioception, cognitive impairment
* History of spinal and thoracic surgeries
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aisha Razzaq, PHD*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barki Rehabilitation Center

Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Riphah IU Samiyah Asghar

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effect of Exercises on Forward Head Posture
NCT06927167 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA