Ablation of Typical Right Atrial Flutter

NCT ID: NCT05755074

Last Updated: 2024-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-28

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Typical atrial flutter ablation involving forming a line of block across the cavotricuspid isthmus in the right atrium has become a commonly performed procedure and is considered a class I indicated procedure for patients who wish to pursue maintenance of sinus rhythm. The ablation generally involves 2-3 catheters and is typically performed through the femoral vein(s). After the ablation procedure, the patient is placed on bed rest for 4 hours, and typically discharged home the same day on oral anticoagulation.

Catheter technology has improved over the past several years allowing for more rapid ablation with shorter procedure times. Ultrasound has also become more routinely used when obtaining venous access for the patient.

To date, ablation of typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm has not been reported. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies have been performed through the arm and AV node ablation has also been reported from the cephalic, internal jugular, axillary and subclavian veins. The potential benefits include shorter recovery time, reduced risk of retroperitoneal bleed, and the avoidance of access complications from the groin.

This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of performing typical atrial flutter ablation through the arm.

Specifically, the study will aim to:

1. Compare the recovery time immediately after the procedure using upper extremity access compared to the standard approach.
2. Compare the success rate of patients that undergo ablation of typical atrial flutter through the upper extremity venous system (experimental approach) to the standard approach (i.e., through the femoral vein(s). Success will be defined as ablation that leads to evidence for bidirectional block across the right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus.
3. Establish what the potential complications are from performing typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm. The left arm will be the preferred site for access because of less tortuosity to reach the heart. If one side cannot be accessed the alternate arm will be used, but will be left to the discretion of the operator. The operator will have the discretion to switch to a femoral approach at any time.
4. Compare the complication rates of the experimental approach evaluated by the inability to access the vein, and other complications (e.g., bleeding, vein thrombosis, heart perforation) from accessing the vein in the arm to the complication rates of the standard approach.
5. Compare long term (i.e., 1 month and 1 year) success of the experimental approach vs. the standard approach as assessed by maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, without recurrent typical right atrial flutter with in person visits and phone call or chart evaluations.
6. Compare pain severity of the insertion site between the experimental and standard approaches.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Flutter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ablation through upper extremity

Ablation through arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ablation through left arm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ablation through left arm

Ablation through femoral vein

Ablation through vein

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ablation through femoral vein

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ablation through femoral vein

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ablation through left arm

Ablation through left arm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ablation through femoral vein

Ablation through femoral vein

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Referred to the EP lab for typical right atrial flutter ablation as an outpatient
* Bodyweight of 50Kg (110 lb) or above
* Documented typical atrial flutter by 12 lead EKG or telemetry

Exclusion Criteria

* Bodyweight less than 50 Kg
* Inability to provide consent
* Presence of pacemaker or defibrillator with transvenous leads
* Inpatient admission
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hartford Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aneesh Tolat, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hartford Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Aneesh Tolat, MD

Role: CONTACT

8603716182 ext. 21506

Gregory Panza, PhD

Role: CONTACT

8609725799

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Aneesh Tolat, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HHC20200300

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.