Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-28
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Catheter technology has improved over the past several years allowing for more rapid ablation with shorter procedure times. Ultrasound has also become more routinely used when obtaining venous access for the patient.
To date, ablation of typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm has not been reported. Diagnostic electrophysiology studies have been performed through the arm and AV node ablation has also been reported from the cephalic, internal jugular, axillary and subclavian veins. The potential benefits include shorter recovery time, reduced risk of retroperitoneal bleed, and the avoidance of access complications from the groin.
This study aims to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of performing typical atrial flutter ablation through the arm.
Specifically, the study will aim to:
1. Compare the recovery time immediately after the procedure using upper extremity access compared to the standard approach.
2. Compare the success rate of patients that undergo ablation of typical atrial flutter through the upper extremity venous system (experimental approach) to the standard approach (i.e., through the femoral vein(s). Success will be defined as ablation that leads to evidence for bidirectional block across the right atrial cavotricuspid isthmus.
3. Establish what the potential complications are from performing typical atrial flutter through the left or right arm. The left arm will be the preferred site for access because of less tortuosity to reach the heart. If one side cannot be accessed the alternate arm will be used, but will be left to the discretion of the operator. The operator will have the discretion to switch to a femoral approach at any time.
4. Compare the complication rates of the experimental approach evaluated by the inability to access the vein, and other complications (e.g., bleeding, vein thrombosis, heart perforation) from accessing the vein in the arm to the complication rates of the standard approach.
5. Compare long term (i.e., 1 month and 1 year) success of the experimental approach vs. the standard approach as assessed by maintenance of normal sinus rhythm, without recurrent typical right atrial flutter with in person visits and phone call or chart evaluations.
6. Compare pain severity of the insertion site between the experimental and standard approaches.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Typical Flutter Ablation:A Comparison of 4 mm Versus 2 mm Irrigated cathéters
NCT00750711
Catheter Ablation as the First Line Therapy for Typical Atrial Flutter
NCT00213408
Remote Magnetic Navigation For Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation
NCT00560872
Therapy of Atrial Flutter by Afib Ablation
NCT02051621
High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Typical Atrial Flutter
NCT05777850
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ablation through upper extremity
Ablation through arm
Ablation through left arm
Ablation through left arm
Ablation through femoral vein
Ablation through vein
Ablation through femoral vein
Ablation through femoral vein
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ablation through left arm
Ablation through left arm
Ablation through femoral vein
Ablation through femoral vein
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Bodyweight of 50Kg (110 lb) or above
* Documented typical atrial flutter by 12 lead EKG or telemetry
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to provide consent
* Presence of pacemaker or defibrillator with transvenous leads
* Inpatient admission
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hartford Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aneesh Tolat, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hartford Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Aneesh Tolat, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HHC20200300
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.