A Randomized Trial of Contact Force in Atrial Flutter Ablation

NCT ID: NCT02917538

Last Updated: 2020-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

156 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A clinical randomized trial to evaluate if CF guided Radio Frequency Ablation (RFA) to a specific of LSI in atrial flutter i superior to standard RFA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a macro-reentry tachycardia in the right atrium \[1,2\]. AFL is seen in 0,4 -1,2% of ECG´s in the hospital\[3\]. Prevalence is higher in patients with structural heart disease, as hypertension, coronary heart disease and cardiomyopathy and also in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease. AFL occurs frequently among patients operated for congenital heart disease.

Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) using radiofrequency (RF) energy is a well-established first line therapy of typical AFL.

The most common arrhythmia requiring treatment is atrial fibrillation (AF). When performing catheter ablation for AF, contact force (CF) applied during radiofrequency energy delivery is a powerful predictor of the electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins and of the clinical response. However, prospective data documenting the superiority of ablation guided by the real time CF monitoring over the standard procedure both for AF and for AFL, are missing. In this regard, showing superiority of ablation guided by the real time CF monitoring over the standard procedure in the simple lesion model of CTIA can serve as a proof of concept for more complex lesion sets, as in AF ablation. The Lesion Size Index (LSI) estimates the size of the lesion created by ablation. It takes account for the nonlinear relationship between the size of the lesion and its three main determinants (CF, power and duration \[4,5\]), and may therefore be an effective mean to precisely dose the amount of the delivered radiofrequency energy. This may prevent both insufficient lesion creation and complications due to excessive energy delivery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate if CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

Hypothesis:

CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard RFCA with respect to creating lasting ablation lesions in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus region.

Purpose:

The present study is designed to determine if CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard RFCA with respect to creating lasting ablation lesions in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus region.

Inclusion criteria:

Patients with typical AFL undergoing first CTIA are included.

Exclusion criteria:

Congenital heart disease AF is the dominant arrhythmia Prior right atrial atriotomy Significant mitral valve disease New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV Secondary AFL (e.g. post-surgery, infections, hyperthyroidism) Age \< 40 years Patient does not want to participate.

Study size:

156 patients.

Study design:

Randomized controlled double-blinded study

Inclusion and randomization:

Consecutive patients referred to Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby for ablation of AFL will be screened. All pts without documented AF will undergo a 5 day ambulatory ECG before the scheduled ablation procedure.

Pts with AF documented either on a 12-lead ECG or during ambulatory ECG will be informed about pulmonary vein isolation, if suitable and in the case of accept will be referred for such.

Pts without documented AF fulfilling the inclusion criteria and pts who are not candidates for or not wanting Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) will be invited to an interview with the daily contact person. They will here be informed about the study both orally and written. The interview will take place in a room specially selected for this interview to ensure there will be no interruptions. At the end of the interview pts will be asked to sign a written consent form. Subsequently patients are randomized (computer-based) to two Groups:

1. In group 1, the ablation will be guided by real time CF monitoring and LSI, with a target LSI of 7,0 with a target range 6,8-7.2 . The aim will be a stable contact, and CF 10-30 g. Intermittent contact will be avoided.
2. In group 2, the operator is blinded to the real-time CF.

Randomization Study data are recorded in a web-based case record form (CRF) with loggin of all data entries. The CRF is also used for randomization using computerized permuted blocks of different sizes. Randomization is stratified according to gender. An external data manager is responsible for the CRF and has programmed the random-number generator used.

Follow-up

4 weeks after ablation, a 5 day ambulatory ECG will be performed. 3 months after ablation an Electro Physiological study (EP) will be performed along with administration of adenosine to check the completeness of Bidirectional Isthmus Block (BDIB). In case of reconduction BDIB will be completed. Recurrent isthmus conduction will be classified as located in the anterior half of the isthmus, the posterior half of the isthmus or both.

The follow-up will be 12 months. Patients will be seen at the outpatient clinic 12 month after the ablation, where a 12-lead ECG will be performed. Before this 12 months' visit, a 5 day ambulatory ECG will be performed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Flutter

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

In the intervention group: The operator will perform the RFA treatment guided by real-time CF parameters.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

RFA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment

Control group

In the control group: The Operator will perform the RFA treatment blinded to the real-time CF parameters.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RFA

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RFA

Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with typical Atrial flutter undergoing first time Cavo Tricuspid Isthmus Ablation

Exclusion Criteria

* Congenital heart disease
* Atrial fibrillation is the dominant arrhythmia
* Prior right atrial atriotomy
* Significant mitral valve disease
* NYHA IV
* Secondary AFL (e.g. post-surgery, infections, hyperthyroidism)
* Age \< 40 years
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mikkel Giehm-Reese, MD

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jens Cosedis Nielsen, MD, DMsci

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CTIA-2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AcQForce Pulsed Field Ablation-CE
NCT05113056 COMPLETED NA