A Randomized Trial of Contact Force in Atrial Flutter Ablation
NCT ID: NCT02917538
Last Updated: 2020-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
156 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-01
2020-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Randomised Prospective Trial Comparing Contact Force and Non-contact Force Guided Catheter Ablation for Cavotricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter
NCT02825498
Radio Frequency Ablation for Atrial Flutter With Magnetic Resonance Guidance and Tracking
NCT02380937
Catheter Ablation as the First Line Therapy for Typical Atrial Flutter
NCT00213408
Fluoroscopic, Contact Force and Local Impedance With Ultra-high Density Mapping Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Comparison for cavoTricuspid Isthmus dependenT Atrial fluttER: the FLUTTER Study
NCT04434599
Clinical Evaluation of Therapy™ Cool Path™ Duo Cardiac Ablation System for the Treatment of Typical Atrial Flutter (AFL)
NCT00984204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) using radiofrequency (RF) energy is a well-established first line therapy of typical AFL.
The most common arrhythmia requiring treatment is atrial fibrillation (AF). When performing catheter ablation for AF, contact force (CF) applied during radiofrequency energy delivery is a powerful predictor of the electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins and of the clinical response. However, prospective data documenting the superiority of ablation guided by the real time CF monitoring over the standard procedure both for AF and for AFL, are missing. In this regard, showing superiority of ablation guided by the real time CF monitoring over the standard procedure in the simple lesion model of CTIA can serve as a proof of concept for more complex lesion sets, as in AF ablation. The Lesion Size Index (LSI) estimates the size of the lesion created by ablation. It takes account for the nonlinear relationship between the size of the lesion and its three main determinants (CF, power and duration \[4,5\]), and may therefore be an effective mean to precisely dose the amount of the delivered radiofrequency energy. This may prevent both insufficient lesion creation and complications due to excessive energy delivery. The aim of the present study is to evaluate if CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).
Hypothesis:
CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard RFCA with respect to creating lasting ablation lesions in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus region.
Purpose:
The present study is designed to determine if CF guided ablation targeting a specific value of LSI is superior to standard RFCA with respect to creating lasting ablation lesions in the cavo-tricuspid isthmus region.
Inclusion criteria:
Patients with typical AFL undergoing first CTIA are included.
Exclusion criteria:
Congenital heart disease AF is the dominant arrhythmia Prior right atrial atriotomy Significant mitral valve disease New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV Secondary AFL (e.g. post-surgery, infections, hyperthyroidism) Age \< 40 years Patient does not want to participate.
Study size:
156 patients.
Study design:
Randomized controlled double-blinded study
Inclusion and randomization:
Consecutive patients referred to Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby for ablation of AFL will be screened. All pts without documented AF will undergo a 5 day ambulatory ECG before the scheduled ablation procedure.
Pts with AF documented either on a 12-lead ECG or during ambulatory ECG will be informed about pulmonary vein isolation, if suitable and in the case of accept will be referred for such.
Pts without documented AF fulfilling the inclusion criteria and pts who are not candidates for or not wanting Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) will be invited to an interview with the daily contact person. They will here be informed about the study both orally and written. The interview will take place in a room specially selected for this interview to ensure there will be no interruptions. At the end of the interview pts will be asked to sign a written consent form. Subsequently patients are randomized (computer-based) to two Groups:
1. In group 1, the ablation will be guided by real time CF monitoring and LSI, with a target LSI of 7,0 with a target range 6,8-7.2 . The aim will be a stable contact, and CF 10-30 g. Intermittent contact will be avoided.
2. In group 2, the operator is blinded to the real-time CF.
Randomization Study data are recorded in a web-based case record form (CRF) with loggin of all data entries. The CRF is also used for randomization using computerized permuted blocks of different sizes. Randomization is stratified according to gender. An external data manager is responsible for the CRF and has programmed the random-number generator used.
Follow-up
4 weeks after ablation, a 5 day ambulatory ECG will be performed. 3 months after ablation an Electro Physiological study (EP) will be performed along with administration of adenosine to check the completeness of Bidirectional Isthmus Block (BDIB). In case of reconduction BDIB will be completed. Recurrent isthmus conduction will be classified as located in the anterior half of the isthmus, the posterior half of the isthmus or both.
The follow-up will be 12 months. Patients will be seen at the outpatient clinic 12 month after the ablation, where a 12-lead ECG will be performed. Before this 12 months' visit, a 5 day ambulatory ECG will be performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group
In the intervention group: The operator will perform the RFA treatment guided by real-time CF parameters.
RFA
Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment
Control group
In the control group: The Operator will perform the RFA treatment blinded to the real-time CF parameters.
RFA
Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RFA
Both groups will receive radiofrequency ablation treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Atrial fibrillation is the dominant arrhythmia
* Prior right atrial atriotomy
* Significant mitral valve disease
* NYHA IV
* Secondary AFL (e.g. post-surgery, infections, hyperthyroidism)
* Age \< 40 years
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mikkel Giehm-Reese, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jens Cosedis Nielsen, MD, DMsci
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby
Aarhus, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTIA-2016
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.