The "SPARCOL" Study

NCT ID: NCT05734300

Last Updated: 2023-07-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-01

Study Completion Date

2027-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Mortality following elective colorectal cancer surgery range between 2.5-6% and increase for the elderly and frail patient regardless of T-stage. Around 80% of the patients who present with a colon cancer and is in a condition where surgery is possible will be offered resection of the tumor. A part of the colon is always removed together with the lymph nodes in order to ensure that cancer cells are not left behind. The risk of lymph node metastasis is dependent on several histopathological characteristics of the tumor. The overall risk of lymph node metastases is less than 20 % in patients with early colon cancer. This indicates that the majority of patients with early colon cancer have no benefit of additional resection besides local tumor excision. The alternative to resecting a larger part of the bowel is to make more focused surgery only resecting a small part of the bowel part through a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques. This new organ sparing approach is called Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS). The investigators aimed to examinate the hypothesis that organ preserving approach (CELS) provides superior quality of recovery in elderly frail patients with small colon cancers when compared with standard surgery in RCT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Frailty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CELS

The Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) is a hybrid procedure that enables large local excisions of the colon without segmental resection while under general anaesthesia. In our study, CELS refers only to endoscopic assisted laparoscopic resection.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The main surgical advantage in this procedure is the ability to view the colon intra- and extraluminal simultaneously. The laparoscopic approach enables manipulation and mobilization of the colon, while the endoscopic view secures that the resection is complete and not overlapping the ileac valve or creating stenosis.

Compared to the traditional oncological colon resection, the CELS resection is a minimally invasive procedure - organ sparing procedure leading to a reduced surgical stress response.

Standard Surgery

Standard surgical resection of colonic cancer following standard oncologic principles while under general anaesthesia.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this study standard resection of the colon will be performed according to complete mesocolic excision (CME) principles.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Combined Endoscopic Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS)

The main surgical advantage in this procedure is the ability to view the colon intra- and extraluminal simultaneously. The laparoscopic approach enables manipulation and mobilization of the colon, while the endoscopic view secures that the resection is complete and not overlapping the ileac valve or creating stenosis.

Compared to the traditional oncological colon resection, the CELS resection is a minimally invasive procedure - organ sparing procedure leading to a reduced surgical stress response.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard resection

In this study standard resection of the colon will be performed according to complete mesocolic excision (CME) principles.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and Female participants providing written informed consent aged 75 years and older
* PS score ≥1 and /or ASA score ≥3
* Macroscopically or pathological colonic adenocarcinoma
* Clinical TNM classification T1/T2 N0 M0
* Eligible and suitable for CELS resection according to MDT
* Tumor must be located in colon, and not involving the ileac valve or taking up more than 50% of the lumen in an air-distended bowel wall

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to give informed consent
* Histological high-risk features in biopsy material from tumor (mucin, signet cells, de- differentiation)
* Suspected other malignancy than adenocarcinoma (e.g. neuroendocrine tumors)
* Preoperative chemo/radiotherapy
* Creation of stoma perioperative
* Non-Danish speakers
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zealand University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev

Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Hospital Soenderjylland

Aabenraa, , Denmark

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Zealand University Hospital

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ilze Ose, MD

Role: CONTACT

27293399 ext. 0045

Ismail Gögenur, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

26336426 ext. 0045

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mads Falk Klein

Role: primary

38681543 ext. 0045

Henrik Loft Jacobsen

Role: backup

Ilze Ose, Prof.

Role: primary

27293399 ext. 0045

Ismail Gögenur

Role: backup

26336426 ext. 0045

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EMN 2022-04791

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.