Length of Hospital Stay, Nursing Hours and Recovery After Laparoscopic Versus Open Colon Resection Without Fast Track
NCT ID: NCT01127425
Last Updated: 2010-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-07-31
2008-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fast Track in Open Colonic Surgery - A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT00556790
Implementation of Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer
NCT01326065
Comparison of Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Colorectal Cancer: … A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00155727
Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery Compared With Open Surgery in Treating Patients With Colon Cancer
NCT00002575
Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
NCT01341366
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
OBJEKTIVE: To compare laparoscopic and open colonic resection concerning nursing hours, length of hospital stay and recovery.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: triple blinded study (Patient, nursing staff and data collector) including 2 x 12 patients needing sigmoid resection due to cancer. Nursing hours, length of hospital stay and recovery (postoperative pain, questionnaire, actigraph ect.)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Intervention: Surgery: laparoscopic sigmoid resection without fast track postoperative care
laparoscopic sigmoid resection
sigmoid resection by laparoscopic surgery
2
Intervention: Surgery: conventional (open) sigmoid resection without fast track postoperative care
laparoscopic colonic resection
Conventional surgery compared to laparoscopic sigmoid resection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
laparoscopic colonic resection
Conventional surgery compared to laparoscopic sigmoid resection
laparoscopic sigmoid resection
sigmoid resection by laparoscopic surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* sigmoid neoplasms localized 20 cm from anus
* age 40-90
Exclusion Criteria
* stoma
* severe postoperative complications (anastomosis leak, intraabdominal abscess, reoperation, stay at intensive care unit, heart attack, pulmonary embolism)
* no informed consent
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Britta Kaltoft, doctor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Gentofte
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital of Gentofte, gastroenterologic surgery
Hellerup, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA-20060067
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.