Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Colonic Resection

NCT ID: NCT00894725

Last Updated: 2009-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

268 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-02-29

Study Completion Date

2008-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main goal of this study is to clarify if laparoscopy (LPS) could become the standard approach in patients undergoing left colonic resection.

268 patient candidates to left colonic resection were randomly assigned to LPS (n=134) or open (n=134) approach. Postoperative care protocol was the same in both groups. Trained members of the surgical staff who were not involved in the study registered 30-day postoperative morbidity. Cost-benefit analysis was based on hospital costs. Long-term morbidity, quality of life, and 5-year survival have also been evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study design was explained to the potential participants who were asked to sign a written informed consent before randomization.

Eligible patients were randomly allocated to LPS or open surgery. Randomization list was computer generated. Assignments were made by means of sealed sequenced masked envelopes which were opened, before the induction of anesthesia, by a nurse unaware of the trial design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer Benign Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LPS

laparoscopic left colonic resection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laparoscopic left colonic resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic colonic resection

Open

open left colonic resection

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

open left colonic resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

conventional open colonic resection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopic left colonic resection

laparoscopic colonic resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

open left colonic resection

conventional open colonic resection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \> 18 years
* suitability to elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* cancer infiltrating adjacent organs assessed by computed tomography
* cardiovascular dysfunction (New York Heart Association class \> 3)
* respiratory dysfunction (arterial pO2 \< 70 mmHg)
* hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C)
* ongoing infection
* plasma neutrophil level \< 2.0x109/L
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

San Raffaele Vita-Salute University

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco Braga, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

San Raffaele Vita-Salute University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Raffaele Hospital, Surgical Department

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Braga M, Frasson M, Zuliani W, Vignali A, Pecorelli N, Di Carlo V. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20602506 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

hmsxLPS09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
NCT01040013 COMPLETED PHASE2