ERAS in Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Risk Factors for Delayed Recovery
NCT ID: NCT02527967
Last Updated: 2015-08-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
143 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-01-31
2015-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compliance With ERAS and Five Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Treatment
NCT06342687
ERAS in Colorectal Surgery Diminishes the Negative Impact of Sarcopenia on Short Term Outcomes
NCT02618811
"Ultra" Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer
NCT02727153
Effects of Implementing an ERAS Protocol
NCT06010225
Early Discharge After Robotic Colorectal Surgery (eRCS): a Prospective Observational Study
NCT05408182
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Investigators analysed which of the factors: gender; age; BMI; ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) physical status; type of surgery (colonic resection vs. rectal resection with total mesorectal excision, TME); stage of cancer; distance between the hospital and place of residence; operative time; intraoperative blood loss significantly prolong LOS (primary length of stay, excluding readmissions). Moreover, the compliance with ERAS protocol and its influence on LOS was analysed.
For the purposes of further analyses the entire group of patients was divided into 2 subgroups depending on the length of their hospital stay. On admission every patient received the information about the target length of stay of 4 days. Group 1 consisted of patients whose hospital stay was shorter or equal to the target LOS (≤ 4 days). In group 2 were patients whose hospital stay was longer than 4 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 (≤4 days)
Group 1 consisted of patients whose hospital stay was shorter or equal to the target LOS (≤ 4 days).
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 1 (>4 days)
In group 2 were patients whose hospital stay was longer than 4 days.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* laparoscopic resection
* perioperative care according to ERAS principles
Exclusion Criteria
* with complex cancer who required multi-organ resection
* patients treated with endoscopic techniques using the hybrid TaTME technique (Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jagiellonian University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michał Pędziwiatr
Michał Pędziwiatr, MD PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michał Pędziwiatr, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
2nd Department of Surgery, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
2nd Department of General Surgery
Krakow, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0. No abstract available.
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):801-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JagiellonianU-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.