"Ultra" Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02727153

Last Updated: 2016-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

765 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (E.R.A.S.) programs are now widely accepted in colonic laparoscopic resections because of faster recovery and less perioperative complications.

Objective. Aim of this study is to assess safety and feasibility of discharging patients operated on by laparoscopic colectomy on Post Operative Day 2 (POD 2), so long as the first flatus has passed and in the absence of complication-related symptoms.

Design \& Settings. Non-inferiority, open-label, single center, prospective, randomized study comparing "Ultra" to Classic E.R.A.S. with discharge on POD 2 and 4 respectively.

Patients. 765 patients with resectable non metastatic colonic cancer were analyzed: 384 patients were assigned to "Ultra" E.R.A.S. and 381 to Classic E.R.A.S.

Main Outcome Measures. Demographics, clinico-pathological, ASA class and morbi-mortality, along with surgical complications, re-operation and readmission rate were recorded and compared. Primary end-point was mortality; secondary end-points were morbidity, re-admission and re-operation rate.

Limitations. It is a single center experience; it is not double-blind, with the intrinsic risk of intentional or unconscious bias; exclusion criteria because of "non compliance" may be considered arbitrary.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

From January 2008 to September 2015, 765 patients were prospectively randomized for early discharge after laparoscopic colectomy according to E.R.A.S. programs: after obtained informed consent, 384 patients were randomly assigned to the "Ultra" E.R.A.S. group and 381 to Classic E.R.A.S. group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colonic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

"Ultra" E.R.A.S.

Discharge patients on Post Operative Day 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

"Ultra" E.R.A.S.

Intervention Type OTHER

Classic E.R.A.S.

Discharge patients on Post Operative Day 4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Classic E.R.A.S.

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

"Ultra" E.R.A.S.

Intervention Type OTHER

Classic E.R.A.S.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Resectable colonic cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* metastatic patients
* T4b tumors
* urgent operations (because of obstruction, perforation or bleeding refractory to conservative treatment)
* huge neoplasms (\>7cm)
* positive cytology in peritoneal lavage or frank carcinosis
* inability to tolerate pneumoperitoneum
* ASA class 4
* severe portal hypertension with hepato-caval gradient \>10mmHg
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AUSL Romagna Rimini

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luca Maria Siani

MD - Ph.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AUSLR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gut Oxygenation and Laparoscopy
NCT01040013 COMPLETED PHASE2