Effectiveness of ERAS on Postoperative Recovery After Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy

NCT ID: NCT06984952

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-13

Study Completion Date

2029-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter study is designed to evaluate the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the rate of meeting discharge criteria in patients undergoing minimally-invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer. We hypothesize that implementation of our ERAS protocol will significantly increase the proportion of patients who meet standardized discharge criteria following minimally-invasive gastrectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive gastrectomy were randomly allocated to receive either the ERAS protocol (n = 154) or the conventional protocol (n = 154). The conventional group received the current standard perioperative care at our institution, whereas the ERAS group received a newly developed ERAS protocol, which included preoperative carbohydrate loading, reduced perioperative fasting duration, and multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who met standardized discharge criteria at 9:00 AM on postoperative day 4. Secondary outcomes included the EQ-5D-5L index assessed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postoperatively; pain intensity at rest and during coughing measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale at 2, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively; gastrointestinal dysfunction assessed using the I-FEED score at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively; the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 hours after surgery; the incidence of major postoperative complications classified by the Clavien-Dindo grading system during hospitalization; and postoperative length of hospital stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A prospective randomized open-labeled, multicenter study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ERAS group

Perioperative care for minimally-invasive gastrectomy is managed according to ERAS protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ERAS protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The ERAS protocol includes pre-admission patient education through audiovisual materials; reduction of perioperative fasting duration with preoperative carbohydrate loading and early postoperative oral intake; multimodal prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting; early removal of surgical drains and intravenous lines; early mobilization; and multimodal analgesia aimed at minimizing postoperative opioid use. The detailed protocol used in this study has been published previously \[https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e27\].

Conventional group

Perioperative care for minimally-invasive gastrectomy is managed according to our current perioperative practice

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERAS protocol

The ERAS protocol includes pre-admission patient education through audiovisual materials; reduction of perioperative fasting duration with preoperative carbohydrate loading and early postoperative oral intake; multimodal prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting; early removal of surgical drains and intravenous lines; early mobilization; and multimodal analgesia aimed at minimizing postoperative opioid use. The detailed protocol used in this study has been published previously \[https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e27\].

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged ≥19 years scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic or robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I to III
* Ability to provide written informed consent, demonstrate understanding of the study protocol, and complete patient-reported outcome measures appropriately

Exclusion Criteria

* Requirement for resection of organs other than the stomach during surgery (except for cholecystectomy)
* History of upper abdominal surgery (except for cholecystectomy)
* Known hypersensitivity to fentanyl, ropivacaine, acetaminophen, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
* Determined by the investigator or study personnel to be otherwise unsuitable for participation in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Boramae Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Severance Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chungnam National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Center, Korea

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Catholic University of Korea

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ajou University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Pusan National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seoul National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hojin Lee, MD, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Do Joong Park, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seoul National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pusan National University Hospital

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Chungnam National University Hospital

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

National Cancer Center

Goyang, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Seoul National University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Severance hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center,

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Ajou University School of Medicine

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hojin Lee, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

82-2-2072-2467

Do Joong Park, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chang In Choi, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-51-240-7000

Seung Wan Ryu, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-1577-6622

Sang-Il Lee, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-1599-7123

Hong Man Yoon Yoon, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+82-31-920-1931

Yun-Suhk Suh Suh, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-1588-3369

Hojin Lee, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-2-2072-0039 ext. 82-2-2072-0039

Do Joong Park, MD, PhD

Role: backup

82-2-2072-2318 ext. 82-2-2072-2318

Han Hong Lee, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+82-2-2258-1511

Hyoung-Il Kim, MD, PhD

Role: primary

+82-2-2228-1004

Dong-Seok Han, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-1577-0075

Hoon Hur, MD, PhD

Role: primary

82-31-219-4311

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lee HJ, Kim J, Koo BW, Suh YS, Lee JM, Han DS, Hong SH, Lee HH, Yoo YC, Kim HI, Rho JY, Yoon HM, Kim HY, Hur H, Kim HJ, Choi CI, Hong B, Lee SI, Park K, Ryu SW, Park DJ. Survey of Perioperative Practices in Gastric Cancer Surgery for Establishing an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Across 10 Tertiary Hospitals in South Korea. J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jul;25(3):424-436. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40631472 (View on PubMed)

Lee HJ, Kim J, Yoon SH, Kong SH, Kim WH, Park DJ, Lee HJ, Yang HK. Effectiveness of ERAS program on postoperative recovery after gastric cancer surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3306-3313. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002328.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40072360 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2501-115-1609

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.