POWER AUDIT, Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol After Gastric Surgery (POWER 4 + 3)
NCT ID: NCT06790238
Last Updated: 2025-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
350 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-09-01
2025-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is proposed to review the medical records of oncology patients included in POWER 4 (as already foreseen in that study), with the aim of performing a 3-year follow-up.
To create comparable treatment and control groups, the Propensity Index method will be used. To study each variable, multivariate regression will be used. Kaplan-Meier will be used for survival and the log-rank test for comparisons. Significance will be considered if p \<0.05 (two tails).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Gastric Surgery for Cancer
NCT03865810
POWER AUDIT, Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
NCT06369194
Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
NCT03012802
Prehabilitation in Oncological Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery (PROGRESS)
NCT06404489
Long-term Enlarged Survival After an Enhanced Recovery Protocol (LESAS).
NCT04305314
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Only routine clinical data will be included and, when not available, the field will be left blank, e.g., patients lost to follow-up. Regional groups may supplement their basic data set with a very limited number of additional variables.
Data collection The data will be collected from CRFs collected in POWER4. The list of pseudo-anomized patients delivered at the time will be provided with the new variables to be completed by the centers.
Variables Overall mortality: The number and percentage of deaths occurred since the intervention until the end of the follow-up period.
Overall survival: patients alive from surgery to the last control. Disease-free survival: number of patients alive and without cancer recurrence from the intervention period until the end of follow-up.
Disease recurrence: detected by CT or FCC, from the day of the intervention until the end of the follow-up.
Date until start of adjuvant treatment: date between date of discharge and start of adjuvant treatment
Satistica analyse All regional and institutional level data will be anonymised prior to publication.
Continuous variables will be described as mean and standard deviation, if normally distributed, or median and inter-quartile range, if not normally distributed.
Comparisons of continuous variables will be performed using one-way ANOVA or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate.
Categorical variables will be described as proportions and will be compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Single-level and hierarchical multi-level logistic regression models will be constructed to identify factors independently associated with these outcomes and to adjust for differences in confounding factors.
Factors will be entered into the models based on their univariate relation to outcome (p\<0.05), biological plausibility and low rate of missing data. A stepwise approach will be used to enter new terms.
Results of logistic regression will be reported as adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. The models will be assessed through the use of sensitivity analyses to explore possible interacting factors and examine any effect on the results. A single final analysis is planned at the end of the study.
Survival analyzes will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival comparisons the log-rank test will be used. The effects will be considered significant if p \<0.05.
Monitoring and audit The data collection documents will be audited to ensure that study activities are carried out in accordance with the protocol, good clinical practice and applicable regulatory requirements. In the participating hospitals, local study documents can be selected for local auditing. The quality of the data will be audited.
Limitations of the study Those of a prospective non-randomized study. Difficulty in recruiting patients for potential structural or multidisciplinary team problems. Inappropriate number of patients due loss of follow-up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
gastric surgery and ERAS protocol
Patients under gastric surgery in an ERAS protocol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grupo Español de Rehabilitación Multimodal
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario Mancha Centro
Alcázar de San Juan, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Cruces
Barakaldo, , Spain
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Basurto
Bilbao, , Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Fuenlabrada, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara
Guadalajara, , Spain
Hospital Comarcal de Inca
Inca, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti Lugo
Lugo, , Spain
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario de Móstoles
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital de Mérida
Mérida, , Spain
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense
Ourense, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, , Spain
Complejo Asistencial universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Hospital Sant Joan Despi Moises Broggi
Sant Joan Despí, , Spain
HU Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, , Spain
Hospital Nº Sº Virgen del Prado
Talavera de la Reina, , Spain
Hospital Universitario Araba
Vitoria-Gasteiz (Álava), , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
POWER 4 + 3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.