Clinical Study on Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer (COACT_0301)

NCT ID: NCT00546468

Last Updated: 2012-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

164 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-06-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rationale: For the treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) in the distal portion of the stomach, subtotal gastrectomy and lymph node dissection has been a standard operation. With the increasing tendency toward minimally invasive surgery, there has been an effort to apply minimally invasive techniques to the treatment of EGC. Laparoendoluminal mucosectomy and lesion-lifting gastric wedge resection have been developed for this purpose. However, these methods have the disadvantage of limited indications according to the size, shape and depth of invasion. Kitano et al. performed the first laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection and manual anastomosis with anterior wall lifting method for a patient with EGC. In 1995, Uyama et al. and Nagai et al. performed laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissections using an automatic stapler instead of manual anastomosis for the gastroduodenal anastomosis. It has been possible to maintain an adequate distance from the lesion to the proximal and distal margins of resection, to perform radical lymph node dissection, and to achieve excellent postoperative recovery. However, there is a very limited evidence of superiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy over open surgery. There is only one interim report of randomized clinical trial of comparing laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy. A well-designed clinical study to prove the benefit and safety is definitely needed Objective: to compare Laparoscopy - assisted Distal Gastrectomy (LADG) with Open Distal Gastrectomy (ODG) in terms of survival, recovery, pain, complications, and quality of life (QOL) Hypothesis: LADG is beneficial in QOL, pain, recovery, complications while maintaining equivalent survival with ODG

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Randomization

Randomization is done by person who is not involved in study. So it is done by the person in Center for Clinical Trial in National Cancer Center. The patient is enrolled in the out-patient clinic after getting informed consent of the clinical study from the patient. Surgeon factor is not considered as a randomization factor because this clinical study will be performed intramurally. In Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Surgical techniques and extent of resections are generally standardized and surgical outcomes are same in terms of complication and recovery.
2. Follow-up schedule

Patients are followed up in the outpatient department at four weeks, three months, six months, and twelve months after the operation, and every six months thereafter. On each visit, history was reviewed and physical examination was done. A complete blood count (CBC) and serum chemistry were evaluated also. An esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) was performed at three months after the operation and yearly thereafter. Abdominal computed tomography (ACT) was evaluated annually.
3. Assessment of QOL The European EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire is a 30-item cancer-specific integrated system for assessing the health-related QOL of cancer patients. The questionnaire incorporates five scales of function (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea and vomiting), a global health and QOL scale, and single items for the assessment of additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (e.g., dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation and diarrhea), as well as the perceived financial impact of the disease and treatment. All items were scored on four-point Likert scales, with the exception of two items in the global health QOL scale, which used modified seven-point linear analog scales. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 with a 22-item stomach cancer-specific questionnaire was also used. It incorporates five hypothesized scales-(dysphasia, eating restrictions, pain, reflux and anxiety) and four single items (having a dry mouth, body image, taste, and hair loss) covering disease and treatment-related symptoms and specific emotional consequences of gastric cancer.12 All instruments of the questionnaire were administered preoperatively and postoperatively at seven days, 30 days, 90 days and yearly. Those time points were chosen at usual follow-up schedule for every gastrectomized patients in our institute, to maximize compliance for the questionnaire, and to compare other parameters at the same time.
4. Statistical analyses The EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom subscale and the EORTC QLQ-STO22 subscale scores are reported using a scale from 0 to 100. Statistical analyses of the QOL outcomes evaluated the differences between the LADG and the ODG groups with respect to the overall changes from the preoperative scores (baseline) to those obtained at follow-up. To adjust for possible baseline differences, we included the baseline values in the model. All comparisons between groups were based on 'intent-to-treat' analyses in which patients were analyzed according to their assigned treatment group. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Student's t-test. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures was used to compare the two groups of patients with respect to overall changes in their short term quality of life after the surgery. The SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) program called 'PROC GLM' was used.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy

Laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection.Surgery will be done in similar operative extent with control open distal gastrectomy. Omentectomy will be omitted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

under general endotracheal anesthesia, Five laparoscopic ports are made. Lymph node dissection and ligations of vessels are done in laparoscopic field. A 5-6cm small incision is made transversely in RUQ of the abdomen. Through the incisional window, stomach is taken out and resected. A Billroth I gastroduodenostomy using EEA stapler and GIA is performed. Abdomen is closed after hemostasis.

Open Distal Gastrectomy

Conventional standard D2 open distal gastrectomy without omentectomy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Open distal gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open distal gastrectomy is performed under general endotracheal anesthesia. A long midline incision is made. omentectomy is skipped and D2 lymph node dissection is performed. Anastomosis is done in same manner as LADG. Abdomen is closed after hemostasis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy

under general endotracheal anesthesia, Five laparoscopic ports are made. Lymph node dissection and ligations of vessels are done in laparoscopic field. A 5-6cm small incision is made transversely in RUQ of the abdomen. Through the incisional window, stomach is taken out and resected. A Billroth I gastroduodenostomy using EEA stapler and GIA is performed. Abdomen is closed after hemostasis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open distal gastrectomy

Open distal gastrectomy is performed under general endotracheal anesthesia. A long midline incision is made. omentectomy is skipped and D2 lymph node dissection is performed. Anastomosis is done in same manner as LADG. Abdomen is closed after hemostasis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LADG ODG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach
* Age: 18-80 years
* Performance status: ECOG 0-1
* Informed consent should be signed
* EGD finding of early gastric cancer
* EUS finding of mucosa and submucosa cancer
* The location of the tumor should be antrum, angle, lower body in greater curvature in UGIS
* No evidence of distant metastasis in abdomen CT, and chest PA
* Regional lymph node metastasis confined to perigastric node (N1) in CT and EUS

Exclusion Criteria

* Any comorbidity obviating major surgery
* Contraindication of laparoscopy: severe cardiac disease, abdominal wall hernias, diaphragmatic hernias, uncorrected coagulopathies, portal hypertension, pregnancy
* Previous upper abdominal operation
* Indication of EMR: well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, less than 2 cm in EGC type I and IIa, less than 1cm in EGC type IIb and IIc, no ulceration
* Complicated case needed to get emergency operation
* Any accompanying surgical condition needed to be performed in same time
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Center, Korea

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Young-Woo Kim

Head of Department of Gastric Cancer Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Young-Woo Kim, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):721-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e62e.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18948798 (View on PubMed)

Kim YW, Yoon HM, Yun YH, Nam BH, Eom BW, Baik YH, Lee SE, Lee Y, Kim YA, Park JY, Ryu KW. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a randomized controlled trial (COACT 0301). Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4267-76. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3037-x. Epub 2013 Jun 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23793805 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncc.re.kr

The official web site of National Cancer Center

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

_NCCCTS-052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 COMPLETED NA