Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Versus Without Bursectomy

NCT ID: NCT03117283

Last Updated: 2017-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-28

Study Completion Date

2022-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bursectomy is widely performed in open surgery for advanced gastric cancer in East Asia. However laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with complete bursectomy is difficult and rare performed. Herein, we conduct a single-centre randomized controlled trial to explore the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach for achieving complete bursectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although, the clinical value of bursectomy in addition to D2 lymphadenectomy in radical gastrectomy for curable gastric cancer is controversial. Data analysis of the nationwide registry of gastric cancer in Japanese revealed that 10.7% of patients with subserosal and serosal positive cancer developed peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy. Some trials, although, indicated a biologically reasonable but statistically non-significant advantage to bursectomy. But for patients with posterior gastric wall trans-serosal disease, such micrometastases can constitute the seeds of later recurrence. The non-bursectomy showed worse overall survival. Early removal of micrometastases and cancer cells deposited might prove beneficial and a possible therapeutic effect. In any case, the authors reasonably concluded that bursectomy should not be abandoned at this time. The hypothesis that it might actually enhance survival should be entertained. In the past decades, Japanese, Korea, Chinese and even Turkey, surgeons have continued to performed bursectomy and lymph nodes dissection as the conventional open procedures for advanced gastric cancer. Lymph nodes dissection and bursectomy is routinely regarded as a standard surgical procedure during radical open gastrectomy for tumors penetrating the serosa of the posterior gastric wall. Complete bursectomy and lymphadenectomy in open radical gastrectomy may represents a formidable challenge to the best of surgeons and its influences on operative morbidity and mortality, but it can be also safely performed in high volume experience centers or by experienced surgeons with mortality rate of \<1% and morbidity rates around 14%.

Generally speaking, bursectomy is incomplete without total gastrectomy. The concept of bursectomy mentioned above is always almost confined to removal of the local anterior membrane of the transverse mesocolon and pancreatic capsule and to open radical gastrectomy. With the generalization and development of laparoscopic technology, laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer as clinical study has extensively performed in Asia.The investigators take the lead in carrying out laparoscopic bursectomy and D2 radical gastrectomy by. Herein, the investigators conduct a single-centre randomized controlled trial to explore the safety and feasibility of totally laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach for achieving complete bursectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Laparoscopic Bursectomy A Left Outside Bursa Omentalis Approach

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LTG with Bursectomy

laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with bursectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with bursectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients with advanced posterior gastric wall cancer including in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with bursectomy group will undergo laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with bursectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach.

LTG without Bursectomy

laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy without bursectomy

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy without bursectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients who are included in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) without bursectomy group will undergo laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy without bursectomy in a conventional manner.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with bursectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach

Patients with advanced posterior gastric wall cancer including in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) with bursectomy group will undergo laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy with bursectomy using a left outside bursa omentalis approach.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy without bursectomy

Patients who are included in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) without bursectomy group will undergo laparoscopic D2 radical total gastrectomy without bursectomy in a conventional manner.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary gastric adenocarcinoma diagnosed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy
* Tumor located in the posterior wall of upper and middle third stomach estimated by endoscopy and CT scan
* Informed consent
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG): 0 ot 1
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: Ⅰto Ⅲ

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or female in suckling period
* Contraindication to general anesthesia (severe cardiac and/or pulmonary disease)
* Severe mental disease
* Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by primary tumor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wei Wang

Wei Wang M.D., PhD.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wei Wang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Wenjun Xiong

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Wei Wang, M.D., PH.D.

Role: CONTACT

+86-13922255515

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wei Wang, M.D.,PH.D.

Role: primary

+86-13922255515

Wenjun Xiong, M.D.

Role: backup

+86-15920553177

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hundahl SA. The potential value of bursectomy in operations for trans-serosal gastric adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):3-4. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0121-6. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22160297 (View on PubMed)

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Registration Committee; Maruyama K, Kaminishi M, Hayashi K, Isobe Y, Honda I, Katai H, Arai K, Kodera Y, Nashimoto A. Gastric cancer treated in 1991 in Japan: data analysis of nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2006;9(2):51-66. doi: 10.1007/s10120-006-0370-y.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16767357 (View on PubMed)

Fujita J, Kurokawa Y, Sugimoto T, Miyashiro I, Iijima S, Kimura Y, Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Mori M, Doki Y. Survival benefit of bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: interim analysis results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):42-8. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0058-9. Epub 2011 May 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21573917 (View on PubMed)

Imamura H, Kurokawa Y, Kawada J, Tsujinaka T, Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Mori M, Doki Y. Influence of bursectomy on operative morbidity and mortality after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):625-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0914-5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21161652 (View on PubMed)

Kayaalp C, Piskin T, Olmez A. Complications of bursectomy after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2012 Jan;36(1):229; author reply 230. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1218-0. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21833663 (View on PubMed)

Hirao M, Kurokawa Y, Fujita J, Imamura H, Fujiwara Y, Kimura Y, Takiguchi S, Mori M, Doki Y; Osaka University Clinical Research Group for Gastroenterological Study. Long-term outcomes after prophylactic bursectomy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: Final analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1099-105. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.024. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25704429 (View on PubMed)

Wang W, Xiong W, Liu Z, Luo L, Zheng Y, Tan P, Diao D, Zou L, Wan J. Clinical significance of No. 10 and 11 lymph nodes posterior to the splenic vessel in D2 radical total gastrectomy: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(32):e4581. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004581.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27512888 (View on PubMed)

Wang W, Liu Z, Xiong W, Zheng Y, Luo L, Diao D, Wan J. Totally laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilum lymph nodes dissection in radical total gastrectomy: an omnibearing method. Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):2030-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4438-9. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26201417 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GDPHCM-GI-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.