Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01309256
Last Updated: 2013-06-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1650 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-03-31
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956
Development of a Versatile Intra-operative On-screen Audiovisual Mentoring System Using TileproTM Program for Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT01319084
Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03396354
Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT01441336
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
R-robot group
retrospective robot group
No interventions assigned to this group
P-robot group
prospective robot group
No interventions assigned to this group
P-laparoscopic group
prospective laparoscopic group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients receiving laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery without preoperative evidence of serosal invasion and distant lymph node metastasis as determined by preoperative CT-scan, upper endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound.
* Patients who have received comprehensive explanation about the planned study, understand and accept all the terms of the study and willingly give consent to participate in all the required elements of the study
\- Any patients who underwent robotic gastrectomy in Korea
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are illiterate
* Patients who are pregnant
* Patients \< 20 years old
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance Hospital
Seoul, Seoul, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):927-32. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73.
Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2009 Jun;23(6):1204-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Kim MC, Heo GU, Jung GJ. Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: surgical techniques and clinical merits. Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):610-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0618-9. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Song J, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim MC, Ryu SW, Kim W, Song KY, Kim HH, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Recurrence following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1,417 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1777-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0932-4. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
Lee HJ, Kim HH, Kim MC, Ryu SY, Kim W, Song KY, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group. The impact of a high body mass index on laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0419-1. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, Lee HJ, Cho GS, Han SU, Hyung WJ; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Oct;15(10):2692-700. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0075-z. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
Kim MS, Kim WJ, Hyung WJ, Kim HI, Han SU, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Park S. Comprehensive Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery: Discovery From a Multicenter Prospective Trial of Robotic Gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):949-956. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003583.
Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, Kim YW, Lee HJ, Ryu KW, Park JM, An JY, Kim MC, Park S, Song KY, Oh SJ, Kong SH, Suh BJ, Yang DH, Ha TK, Kim YN, Hyung WJ. Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):103-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2010-0659
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.