Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02292914

Last Updated: 2019-08-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-10

Study Completion Date

2020-07-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The robot-assisted surgery allows three-dimensional view, detailed access of small structures, depth perception and articulated movements with wide latitude. Thinking about the inclusion of this branch of surgical outcome ICESP encouraged the training of their doctors and other health professionals , and has three tutors in the area of robot- assisted laparoscopic surgery , and various medical clinical staff , already trained , and already perform the procedure in other centers . The da Vinci ® Surgical System ( only existing in the World market) , consisting of one or two consoles for the surgeon and a tutor if necessary was adopted. Ergonomically designed, a stand next to the patient , with four interactive robotic arms , one of them , a vision system for high performance and the other three for exclusive EndoWrist ® instruments . Driven by the latest robotic technology , computer programs , frictionless transmission of manual controls , movements in scale and filtered made by the surgeon in the da Vinci ® System console are translated into precise movements of the instruments EndoWrist ® For surgeons , the da Vinci ® System offers superior 3D viewing with larger surgical precision ergonomic comfort and dexterity . For hospitals , the da Vinci ® Surgical System enables clinical and economic benefits of minimally invasive surgery are applied to a broader base of patients cirúrgicos.The main objective is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of robotic surgery in the surgical treatment of cancer in operations below, as their specialties : Digestive , Urology , Gynecology , Head and Neck and Thorax . This is a prospective study lasting 36 months , where 1120 patients with surgical diseases in programming for the following operations will be studied : transthoracic esophagectomy ; subtotal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy ; partial pancreatectomy ; resection of the rectum ; prostatectomy ; cystectomy ; partial nephrectomy ; hysterectomy with or without pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy ; resection of malignant tumors of the mouth and orofaringolaringe and lung lobectomy . Patients will come from the outpatient services of the Institute of Cancer of São Paulo - ICESP

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective study lasting 36 months. This project includes 10 subprojects in five different specialties:

Specialty: Surgery of the Digestive System Subproject 1: trans-thoracic esophagectomy Subproject 2: subtotal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy Subproject 3: partial pancreatectomy Subproject 4: resection of the rectum Specialty: Urology Surgery Subproject 5: cystectomy Subproject 6: Prostatectomy Subproject 7: Partial Nephrectomy Specialty: Gynecological Surgery Activity 8: Hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy and paraaortic Specialty: Head and Neck Surgery Activity 9: resection of malignant tumors of the mouth and orofaringolaringe Specialty: Thoracic Surgery Subproject 10: pulmonary lobectomies

Each subproject will have a study design, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria and specific methodologies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Cancer Gastric Cancer Pancreatic Cancer Rectal Cancer Bladder Cancer Prostate Cancer Renal Cancer Uterus Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robot-Assisted Surgery

patients undergoing robot assisted surgery for the treatment of cancer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robot-assisted surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robot-assisted esophagectomy; Robot-assisted subtotal gastrectomy; Robot-assisted pancreatectomy;Robot-assisted rectal resection; Robot-assisted radical cistectomy;Robot-assisted prostatectomy;Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy; Robot-assisted hysterectomy;Robot-assisted Resection of malignant tumors of the mouth and orofaringolaringe; Robot-assisted lung lobectomy

Conventional Surgery

patients undergoing conventional surgery for the treatment of cancer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy; Open rectal resection and rectal laparoscopy resection; Open radical cistectomy; Open prostatectomy; Open Partial Nephrectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Laparoscopic lung lobectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robot-assisted surgery

Robot-assisted esophagectomy; Robot-assisted subtotal gastrectomy; Robot-assisted pancreatectomy;Robot-assisted rectal resection; Robot-assisted radical cistectomy;Robot-assisted prostatectomy;Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy; Robot-assisted hysterectomy;Robot-assisted Resection of malignant tumors of the mouth and orofaringolaringe; Robot-assisted lung lobectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Surgery

Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy; Open rectal resection and rectal laparoscopy resection; Open radical cistectomy; Open prostatectomy; Open Partial Nephrectomy; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Laparoscopic lung lobectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients eligible for robotic-assisted surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant patients
* Patients with decompensated systemic diseases
* Patients who were unfit for general anesthesia
* Patients without an indication for surgical treatment of cancer
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ivan Cecconello, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculdade de Medicina da USP

Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculdade de Medicina da USP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto do Câncer de São Paulo - ICESP

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ivan Cecconello, MD

Role: CONTACT

Ulysses Ribeiro-Junior, MD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ivan Cecconello, MD

Role: primary

Silvia Kobayashi, MD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abdalla RZ, Nahas WC, Cecconello I, Ribeiro U Jr. Prospective study of a structured robotic surgery training program in a public cancer hospital in Brazil. J Robot Surg. 2025 Oct 16;19(1):695. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02881-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41099765 (View on PubMed)

Nahas WC, Rodrigues GJ, Rodrigues Goncalves FA, Sawczyn GV, Barros GG, Cardili L, Guglielmetti GB, Fazoli AJC, Cordeiro MD, Cassao VDA, Chade DC, Neves De Oliveira LC, Murta CB, Pontes Junior J, Trindade EM, Bastos DA, Sarkis AS, Mitre AI, Trinh QD, Coelho RF. Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2024 Jul;212(1):32-40. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003967. Epub 2024 May 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38723593 (View on PubMed)

Ribeiro U Jr, Dias AR, Ramos MFKP, Yagi OK, Oliveira RJ, Pereira MA, Abdalla RZ, Zilberstein B, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Short-Term Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy Compared to Open Gastrectomy for Patients with Gastric Cancer: a Randomized Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec;26(12):2477-2485. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05448-0. Epub 2022 Sep 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36127557 (View on PubMed)

Terra RM, Araujo PHXN, Lauricella LL, Campos JRM, Trindade JRM, Pego-Fernandes PM. A Brazilian randomized study: Robotic-Assisted vs. Video-assisted lung lobectomy Outcomes (BRAVO trial). J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Jul 8;48(4):e20210464. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210464. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35830078 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NP433/13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 COMPLETED NA