Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-12-16
2022-12-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy in High-risk Patients With Gastric Cancer: a Nationwide, Multicentre Cohort Study
NCT06603272
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT01309256
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043
Development of a Versatile Intra-operative On-screen Audiovisual Mentoring System Using TileproTM Program for Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT01319084
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SP group
patients group underwent gastrectomy using da vinci SP
da vinc SP gastrectomy
radical subtotal gastrectomy performed by da vinci SP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
da vinc SP gastrectomy
radical subtotal gastrectomy performed by da vinci SP
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Between 20-80
* ASA score (American society of anesthesiology) class: I - III
* Signed to informed consent after through explanation about the study
Exclusion Criteria
* EMR/ESD canddiate
* complicated gastric cancer (obstruction or perforation)
* Active other primary tumor
* Vulerable subject (illiterate, pregnant)
20 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yonsei University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
Lee JH, Kim KM, Cheong JH, Noh SH. Current management and future strategies of gastric cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2012 Mar;53(2):248-57. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.248.
Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8.
Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.
Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):39-52. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.
Kim YM, Baek SE, Lim JS, Hyung WJ. Clinical application of image-enhanced minimally invasive robotic surgery for gastric cancer: a prospective observational study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):304-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2094-0. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
Cruz CJ, Huynh F, Kang I, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Initial experiences of robotic SP cholecystectomy: a comparative analysis with robotic Si single-site cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Jan;100(1):1-7. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.1.1. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
Kang SK, Jang WS, Kim SW, Kim SH, Han SW, Lee YS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP(R) system: initial experience with a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):576-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
Gomes MTV, Machado AMN, Podgaec S, Barison GAS. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):476-480. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4134.
Tokunaga M, Sugisawa N, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(3):542-7. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0293-3. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Lee S, Kim JK, Kim YN, Jang DS, Kim YM, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4002-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Ryu KW, Kim YW, Lee JH. Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1554-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8887.
Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
Tokunaga M, Kondo J, Tanizawa Y, Bando E, Kawamura T, Terashima M. Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Oct;16(10):1854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1981-8. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Bae JM, Kim S, Lee JH. Comparison of Reduced Port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(8):2567-72. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Park SH, Kim YN, Hwang J, Kim KY, Cho M, Kim YM, Hyung WJ, Kim HI. Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial using the da Vinci Single Port(SP) robotic system. Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 30;13(1):18578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45655-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4-2021-0881
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.