Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-12-18
2023-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: Determine the efficacy of oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone in reducing infant's agitation during LUS scan Method: This is a blinded, prospective, parallel group randomized controlled trial comparing the Premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score in infants randomized to receive oral sucrose followed by soother soother vs. soother alone while having LUS scan Study outcomes: The primary outcome of this study is to compare the changes in PIPP scores at 4 time points between infants receiving oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone. The secondary outcomes are 1) total time to complete a standard LUS scan from start of scanning to the end, 2) Association of LUS with adverse events e.g., episodes of desaturation, tachycardia, bradycardia or apnea.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Be Sweet to Babies During Nasolaryngoscopy
NCT06641687
Sucrose Practices for Pain in Neonates
NCT02134873
Sucrose Practices for Pain in Neonates Part B
NCT02725814
Pilot Study of Sucrose to Reduce Pain in Sick Babies
NCT01438008
Sucking and Sucrose as Pain Relief for Infants
NCT00805623
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Method
Design: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PIPP score during LUS in infants who receive oral sucrose plus soother vs. soother alone.
Population: described below
Intervention The study is a 2-arm, randomized controlled trial. Infants will be allocated to one of the 2 groups as described below
Study Procedures:
Infants' face and physiological monitor will be video recorded for 30 seconds before administration of study intervention. Video recording will be paused during the administration of study intervention (24% sucrose + soother or soother alone) to be given while maintaining blinding of type of intervention and group assignment for enrolled infants. Video recording will be restarted after administration of the study intervention and will be continued for 1 minute after finishing the scan and returning the baby to pre-intervention state. In infants assigned to group A, the study solution (24% oral sucrose) will be given by a study investigator or bedside nurse to the anterior portion of the tongue without touching the infant's mouth followed by insertion of a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. Infants assigned to group B will receive a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. PIPP score will be assessed at 4-time points a) 30 seconds prior to administration of study intervention (baseline PIPP score), b) 30 seconds into LUS scan, c) midway of LUS scan, d) 30 seconds after the procedure is completed and soother removed.
Outcome measures: The primary and secondary outcomes as described below
Measures Measurement of procedural pain For all enrolled infants, The investigators will assess stress/pain using PIPP score, a validated tool approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics for pain assessment in both term and preterm neonates. The PIPP score is based on seven parameters: corrected gestational age, behavioral state, changes in maximum heart rate (HR), changes in minimum arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), brow bulging, eye squeezing, and nasolabial furrowing. These indices are individually scored from 0 to 3, and the total score is calculated by summing the scores for these 7 indices. The PIPP score ranges from 0-21 in preterm infants.
Measurement of physiological response Heart rate (HR) and Oxygen saturation (SpO2) data will be videotaped directly from the patient's bedside physiological monitor (Philips-The intellivue MX800). HR and SpO2 will be reviewed by videotape analyzer and will be incorporated into PIPP score. Average HR and SpO2, presence of apnea during the LUS will reviewed and documented to assess for adverse events associated with the study procedure.
Measurement of incidence of adverse events The following adverse events associated with the procedure (LUS scan); tachycardia\> 180 bpm, bradycardia\< 100 bpm, SpO2 \< 80%, or apnea (cessation of breathing for \> 20 second or \< 20 second but associated with hypoxia or bradycardia) will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Randomization, allocation and blinding All enrolled infants will be randomized by computer-generated randomization sequence (block size from 4 to 6 with 1:1 allocation ratio) to 24% sucrose plus soother group or soother alone (control group). The random numbers will be placed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes and will be opened after obtaining informed consent and just before the procedure by one of the study investigators to ensure allocation concealment. These envelopes will be kept in a secure, locked drawer in the principle investigator office and only study investigators will have access to it. Attending physician will be blinded, however, the operator who will perform the LUS will not be possible due to nature of intervention. The PIPP score analyzer (the coder) will be blind to group allocation.
Sample size The sample size is calculated based on the results of a previous study that assessed pain/stress associated with echocardiography in neonates using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. The investigators hypothesize a difference of 2 or more in the mean PIPP score between the control and the intervention group. Assuming standard deviation of 2.5 for both groups, with 5% significance level and 80% power, 26 subjects are required in each group. The investigators are planning to recruit 32 subjects in each group (total 64) to account for 20% loss due to errors in videotaping and missing data.
Consent Parents/legal guardians of infants who meet eligibility criteria will be approached for participation in the study. One of the study investigators (who is not involved in infant's care at the time of the consent) will provide a brief description of the research and state clearly that participation is voluntary and that refusal would not change the care that the infant will receive in the unit. Parents/legal guardians who agree to participate will sign a written consent form.
Statistical Analysis Infant characteristics as well as outcomes will be compared between two groups. Difference will be assessed by Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables, and Student t-test (ANOVA F-test) or Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables. Results will be reported as frequency (percentage), mean (standard deviation) or median (inter quartile range) as appropriate. GEE model will be used to assess the significance between two groups with repeat measures. All analyses will be conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Data collection The following data will be collected; Infants' baseline characteristics; gestational age(GA), Birth weight, sex, current/corrected GA and weight, APGAR score at 5 minutes) will be collected. Data regarding current respiratory support at the time of the study will be collected. Total time needed to complete a scan will abstracted from ultrasound machine. Adverse events during the scan such as tachycardia (\> 180 bpm), bradycardia (\< 100 bpm), Oxygen saturation (\< 80%), or apnea episode will be recorded. All patients' identifiers will be removed. A separate list of study ID and Hospital ID (MSID) will be kept on secure hospital drive with password-protected access available only to study investigators.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Oral sucrose + soother group (group A)
Group A: Infants will receive oral sucrose (24%) followed by a soother 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight \< 1500g, 1500-2500g, and \> 2500g respectively.
24% Sucrose solution
Infants will either receive oral sucrose (24%) 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight \< 1500g, 1500-2500g, and \> 2500g respectively.
Soother alone group (group B)
Group B (control group): infants will receive a soother 2 minutes before LUS scan.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
24% Sucrose solution
Infants will either receive oral sucrose (24%) 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight \< 1500g, 1500-2500g, and \> 2500g respectively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing LUS for clinical or research purpose,
* Hemodynamically stable (not requiring any circulatory support), and
* Written informed parental consent is obtained.
Exclusion Criteria
* On pain medications, or
* receiving nothing per oral because of medical condition e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis are excluded
0 Days
37 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adel Mohamed, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sinai Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Adel Mohamed, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-0220-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.