Comparison of Minimal Effective Dose of Sucrose for Pain Relief in Neonates After Minor Procedure

NCT ID: NCT06446323

Last Updated: 2024-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

148 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Type of Study: Randomized Controlled Trial Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two doses of sucrose solution for pain relief in neonates after minor procedures.

Participants' Tasks:

Receive either 0.2 ml or 0.5 ml of sucrose solution. Undergo minor procedures. Pain intensity assessment using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).

Comparison Groups:

Researchers compared the effects of administering 0.2 ml and 0.5 ml doses of sucrose solution on post-procedural pain in neonates.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, from March 2023 to February 2024. It aims to compare the effectiveness of two different doses of sucrose solution (0.2 ml versus 0.5 ml) for pain relief in neonates after minor procedures.

Objective:

To compare the outcome of 0.2 ml versus 0.5 ml sucrose solution for pain relief in neonates after minor procedures.

Study Design:

Randomized Controlled Trial

Study Place and Duration:

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, March 2023 to February 2024.

Participants and Methods:

Total of 148 neonates enrolled who underwent minor procedures and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Randomly divided into two groups:

Group I: Administered 0.2 ml of sucrose solution Group II: Administered 0.5 ml of sucrose solution Pain intensity measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Data analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Procedural Pain Management in Neonates

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In this parallel interventional study, neonates who have undergone minor procedures and are admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit are randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I or Group II. Group I receives a 0.2 ml dose of sucrose solution, while Group II receives a 0.5 ml dose.

The study follows a parallel design, where each group receives a different intervention (different doses of sucrose solution) simultaneously. This design allows for a direct comparison between the two interventions while minimizing potential biases.

After administration of the respective doses, the neonates are monitored for pain intensity using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Data on pain scores are collected and analyzed using statistical methods, such as those performed with SPSS version 25.0.

The primary objective of this parallel interventional study is to determine which dose of sucrose solution (0.2 ml or 0.5 ml) is more effective in reducing post-procedural pain in neonates.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
The investigators responsible for assessing the primary outcome measure, pain intensity using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP), are blinded to the treatment allocation. While neonates and healthcare providers administering the interventions are aware of the treatment groups, the investigators conducting the outcome assessments remain unaware of which dose of sucrose solution each neonate received. This masking of the investigators helps mitigate potential bias in the assessment of pain relief efficacy. However, it is acknowledged that complete masking of all parties involved is not feasible due to the nature of the interventions

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I: Neonates receiving a 0.2 ml dose of sucrose solution

Participants in this arm receive a 0.2 ml dose of sucrose solution. Care providers administer the specified dose of sucrose solution to neonates who have undergone minor procedures and are experiencing post-procedural pain. The dose is administered orally, following standardized protocols. Participants in this group are monitored for pain intensity using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) by investigators who are masked to the treatment allocation. Data on pain scores and any adverse events are recorded and analyzed as part of the study.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.2 ml dose of sucrose

Intervention Type DRUG

Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.

Group II: Neonates receiving a 0.5 ml dose of sucrose solution.

Participants in this arm receive a 0.5 ml dose of sucrose solution. Similar to Arm 1, care providers administer the specified dose orally to neonates following minor procedures. The administration is conducted according to standardized protocols. Pain intensity in this group is also monitored using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) by investigators who remain masked to the treatment allocation. Data collected includes pain scores and any adverse events experienced by participants.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.2 ml dose of sucrose

Intervention Type DRUG

Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.2 ml dose of sucrose

Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

0.5 ml dose of sucrose

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and high dependency unit (HDU) at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi.

Exclusion Criteria

* Neonates with contraindications for sucrose administration, including:

Inability to swallow. Pharmacological muscle relaxation. Heavy sedation. Neonates who are unable to clearly view the infant's face, hindering accurate pain assessment
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rawalpindi Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mehak Fatima

Mehak Fatima

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mehak Fatima

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Pakistan

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Rawalpindi MU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Amphia Premature Infant Pain Study
NCT01276366 COMPLETED NA