Comparison of Minimal Effective Dose of Sucrose for Pain Relief in Neonates After Minor Procedure
NCT ID: NCT06446323
Last Updated: 2024-06-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-01
2024-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants' Tasks:
Receive either 0.2 ml or 0.5 ml of sucrose solution. Undergo minor procedures. Pain intensity assessment using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).
Comparison Groups:
Researchers compared the effects of administering 0.2 ml and 0.5 ml doses of sucrose solution on post-procedural pain in neonates.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analgesic Effect of Oral 25% Glucose Versus Oral 24% Sucrose for Pain Relief During Heel Lance in Preterm Neonates
NCT01931020
Sucrose Practices for Pain in Neonates
NCT02134873
Role of Repeated Painful Procedures in Preterm Neonates on Short Term Neurobehavioural Outcome
NCT01190995
The Role of Time Interval Elimination on Pain Control of Preterm Infants by Sucrose Administration
NCT05465694
Role of Oral Sucrose in Reducing the Pain to Orogastric Tube Insertion in Preterm Neonates
NCT00949104
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective:
To compare the outcome of 0.2 ml versus 0.5 ml sucrose solution for pain relief in neonates after minor procedures.
Study Design:
Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Place and Duration:
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, March 2023 to February 2024.
Participants and Methods:
Total of 148 neonates enrolled who underwent minor procedures and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.
Randomly divided into two groups:
Group I: Administered 0.2 ml of sucrose solution Group II: Administered 0.5 ml of sucrose solution Pain intensity measured using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Data analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The study follows a parallel design, where each group receives a different intervention (different doses of sucrose solution) simultaneously. This design allows for a direct comparison between the two interventions while minimizing potential biases.
After administration of the respective doses, the neonates are monitored for pain intensity using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Data on pain scores are collected and analyzed using statistical methods, such as those performed with SPSS version 25.0.
The primary objective of this parallel interventional study is to determine which dose of sucrose solution (0.2 ml or 0.5 ml) is more effective in reducing post-procedural pain in neonates.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I: Neonates receiving a 0.2 ml dose of sucrose solution
Participants in this arm receive a 0.2 ml dose of sucrose solution. Care providers administer the specified dose of sucrose solution to neonates who have undergone minor procedures and are experiencing post-procedural pain. The dose is administered orally, following standardized protocols. Participants in this group are monitored for pain intensity using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) by investigators who are masked to the treatment allocation. Data on pain scores and any adverse events are recorded and analyzed as part of the study.
0.2 ml dose of sucrose
Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.
Group II: Neonates receiving a 0.5 ml dose of sucrose solution.
Participants in this arm receive a 0.5 ml dose of sucrose solution. Similar to Arm 1, care providers administer the specified dose orally to neonates following minor procedures. The administration is conducted according to standardized protocols. Pain intensity in this group is also monitored using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) by investigators who remain masked to the treatment allocation. Data collected includes pain scores and any adverse events experienced by participants.
0.2 ml dose of sucrose
Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
0.2 ml dose of sucrose
Both interventions aim to provide pain relief to neonates following minor procedures by administering sucrose solution orally. The study evaluates the efficacy of each dose (0.2 ml vs. 0.5 ml) in reducing post-procedural pain intensity, as measured by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP). Additionally, any adverse events associated with the administration of sucrose solution are documented and analyzed as part of the study.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Inability to swallow. Pharmacological muscle relaxation. Heavy sedation. Neonates who are unable to clearly view the infant's face, hindering accurate pain assessment
1 Day
30 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rawalpindi Medical College
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehak Fatima
Mehak Fatima
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mehak Fatima
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Rawalpindi MU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.